Skip to content

Is Tuna Better Than Chicken for Protein?

6 min read

According to nutritional data, a serving of cooked chicken breast typically contains slightly more protein per gram than canned tuna, but the full picture involves much more than just protein quantity. Choosing between tuna and chicken depends heavily on your specific dietary goals, nutritional needs, and health considerations.

Quick Summary

A nutritional breakdown compares tuna and chicken for protein and overall health benefits. The comparison covers calories, fat, omega-3s, and micronutrients like selenium and zinc to help users make an informed choice for their diet and fitness objectives.

Key Points

  • Protein Content: Chicken breast offers slightly more protein per gram than canned tuna, but both are excellent high-quality protein sources.

  • Omega-3s vs. Minerals: Tuna provides heart-healthy omega-3s, vitamin D, and selenium, while chicken offers higher amounts of zinc and B5.

  • Calorie and Fat: Canned tuna in water is slightly lower in calories and fat than cooked chicken breast, making it a good option for calorie-conscious diets.

  • Mercury Consideration: Tuna carries a risk of mercury, especially higher-mercury varieties like bigeye. Chicken is mercury-free, making it a safer consistent protein source.

  • Convenience and Cost: Canned tuna is exceptionally convenient and affordable, while chicken offers greater versatility in cooking methods.

  • Muscle Recovery: Tuna's anti-inflammatory omega-3s may offer a slight edge for post-workout muscle recovery, though both support muscle growth effectively.

  • Balanced Diet: The optimal approach is to incorporate both chicken and tuna into your diet to reap the unique nutritional benefits of each.

In This Article

Tuna vs. Chicken: A Head-to-Head Nutritional Showdown

For many health-conscious individuals, particularly those focused on fitness, building muscle, or weight loss, the battle between chicken and tuna as the superior protein source is a long-standing debate. While both are celebrated as lean, high-protein options, a closer look at their complete nutritional profiles reveals key differences that can sway your decision. Your choice may depend on more than just the protein count, including factors like fat content, micronutrients, and even preparation style.

The Macronutrient Matrix: Protein, Calories, and Fat

At a glance, both tuna and chicken offer a substantial dose of protein with relatively few calories. However, a slight difference can be important for those meticulously tracking their intake. Cooked, skinless chicken breast often contains a bit more protein per serving size than canned tuna. For example, a 3-ounce (85g) serving of cooked chicken breast may contain 26–27 grams of protein, while the same amount of canned light tuna provides 20–22 grams.

Calorie and fat content also vary. The chicken breast serving typically has around 140 calories and 3 grams of fat, whereas canned tuna in water clocks in with about 100 calories and negligible fat. These differences mean that for someone prioritizing the absolute highest protein-to-calorie ratio, canned tuna might be a slightly better option, provided the sodium content is managed. For those who prefer a higher total protein intake without focusing on a specific calorie limit, chicken may be more appealing.

A Deeper Dive into Vitamins and Minerals

Beyond the basic macronutrients, tuna and chicken differ significantly in their micronutrient offerings. This is where the decision becomes more nuanced, as each provides unique benefits.

Tuna's Advantages:

  • Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Oily fish like tuna are celebrated for their omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA and DHA, which are crucial for heart and brain health. These fatty acids also possess anti-inflammatory properties that can aid muscle recovery after strenuous exercise.
  • Vitamin D: Tuna is a fantastic natural source of vitamin D, with one 4-ounce serving providing about 50 IU, whereas chicken contains almost none.
  • Selenium and B12: Tuna also contains higher levels of selenium and vitamin B12 compared to chicken, which are important for nerve function and blood cell formation.

Chicken's Advantages:

  • Zinc: Chicken is a better source of zinc, a mineral vital for immune function and wound healing.
  • Niacin and Phosphorus: It is also richer in vitamin B5 and certain types of phosphorus, supporting energy metabolism and bone health.

Comparison Table: Tuna vs. Chicken (per 3 oz / 85g serving)*

Nutrient Tuna (Canned in Water) Chicken Breast (Cooked, Skinless)
Protein 20-22g 26-27g
Calories ~100 ~140
Total Fat <1g 3g
Omega-3s High (EPA & DHA) Low/Negligible
Vitamin D Present (~50 IU per 4oz) Minimal/Absent
Selenium High Lower
Zinc Lower Higher
Vitamin B12 High Lower

*Note: Nutritional values can vary based on species, cut, preparation, and canning process.

The Mercury Concern: A Consideration for Tuna

One of the main health considerations for regular tuna consumption is its potential mercury content. Because tuna is a larger, predatory fish, it can accumulate more mercury than smaller fish. For most healthy adults, occasional tuna consumption is not a concern, and the health benefits often outweigh the risks. However, certain populations, such as pregnant or breastfeeding individuals and small children, are advised to limit their intake and choose low-mercury options like canned light tuna. Chicken carries no such risk related to mercury.

Practical Factors: Convenience, Cost, and Versatility

Beyond nutrition, practical considerations influence the choice. Canned tuna is an affordable, shelf-stable, and incredibly convenient source of protein for a quick meal or snack. It requires no cooking and can be eaten straight from the can. Chicken, particularly fresh chicken breast, requires cooking but offers immense versatility in dishes. While often more expensive than canned tuna, fresh or frozen chicken is a staple in many households and can be prepared in countless ways.

Conclusion: No Single Winner

So, is tuna better than chicken for protein? The answer depends on your priorities. For maximum protein with the lowest calories, especially in a convenient, affordable format, canned tuna is a strong contender. Its bonus of omega-3s and vitamin D makes it a heart-healthy choice. However, for those seeking the absolute highest protein count per gram and avoiding mercury concerns, chicken is the safer and often more versatile choice. Ultimately, a balanced diet incorporating both provides the most comprehensive array of nutrients. Both are excellent sources of high-quality protein, and incorporating them alternately can offer the best of both worlds. The key is moderation and tailoring your choice to your specific health and fitness objectives.

If you're an athlete or someone heavily focused on muscle recovery, the anti-inflammatory benefits of tuna's omega-3s might give it a slight edge on certain training days. For everyday, consistent high-protein intake with zero mercury risk, chicken is a reliable champion. As with any diet decision, consulting a registered dietitian can provide personalized guidance tailored to your health profile.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is canned tuna as nutritious as fresh tuna?

While there are slight differences, canned tuna provides a comparable amount of high-quality protein to fresh tuna. The main nutritional differences are often dependent on how it's packed (oil vs. water) and can include variations in omega-3 and sodium levels.

Which is better for weight loss, tuna or chicken?

Both are excellent for weight loss due to their high protein content, which promotes satiety. However, canned tuna packed in water is often slightly lower in calories and fat than cooked chicken breast, which might be a small advantage for those strictly counting calories.

How does sodium content differ between canned tuna and chicken?

Canned tuna is typically much higher in sodium than fresh chicken breast. When buying canned tuna, it is best to opt for a low-sodium version or rinse it before use to mitigate the high salt content.

Do tuna and chicken offer different essential amino acids?

As complete protein sources, both tuna and chicken provide all the essential amino acids your body needs. However, tuna may contain slightly different concentrations and also provides additional beneficial compounds like omega-3 fatty acids not found in significant amounts in chicken.

How often can I safely eat tuna to minimize mercury risk?

For most healthy adults, eating a few servings of light tuna per week is considered safe. Higher-mercury varieties like bigeye tuna should be limited. Always check local health advisories, and those in sensitive populations should consult a doctor.

Is one better than the other for building muscle mass?

Both are effective for building muscle due to their high-quality protein. Chicken breast has a slightly higher protein content per serving, while tuna provides omega-3s that can help reduce muscle inflammation and improve recovery.

What are some low-calorie, high-protein recipes for tuna and chicken?

For tuna, you can make a low-fat tuna salad by using Greek yogurt instead of mayonnaise, or toss it with salad greens and a vinaigrette. For chicken, grilled or baked chicken breast with roasted vegetables or a fresh salad is a great option.

Key Takeaways

  • Protein Quantity vs. Quality: While chicken breast often has a slightly higher protein count per gram, both provide high-quality, complete protein essential for muscle repair and growth.
  • Tuna's Unique Nutrients: Tuna stands out for its high levels of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids, along with selenium and vitamin D, offering benefits beyond simple protein delivery.
  • Chicken's Micronutrient Profile: Chicken is a better source of certain micronutrients like zinc and B5, which support immune function and metabolism.
  • Mercury is a Factor for Tuna: The potential for mercury accumulation in tuna is a notable health consideration, particularly for vulnerable populations, necessitating moderation and choosing lower-mercury varieties.
  • Consider Convenience and Cost: Canned tuna offers unmatched convenience and affordability, while chicken's versatility and low-fat profile make it a reliable staple for consistent high-protein intake.

Citations

American Tuna. (2024, August 29). Tuna vs Chicken: A Protein Powerhouse Comparison. Retrieved from https://americantuna.com/blogs/news/tuna-vs-chicken-a-protein-powerhouse-comparison Chicken of the Sea. (n.d.). Tuna vs. Chicken: Nutrition Showdown. Retrieved from https://chickenofthesea.com/blog/tuna-vs-chicken-nutrition-showdown/ Food Struct. (n.d.). Tuna vs. Chicken meat — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison. Retrieved from https://foodstruct.com/nutrition-comparison/tuna-vs-chicken-meat Klarity Health. (2023, March 22). Dive Into the Debate: Is Fish Healthier Than Chicken. Retrieved from https://my.klarity.health/is-fish-healthier-than-chicken/ Medical News Today. (2025, January 29). Tuna: Risks and how often to eat it. Retrieved from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/306246 John West. (n.d.). Fresh vs canned tuna - Is there a difference in protein content?. Retrieved from https://www.john-west.co.uk/educate-me/fresh-vs-canned-tuna-is-there-a-difference-in-protein-content/ Healthline. (2020, November 6). Is Canned Tuna Healthy? Nutrition, Benefits, and Downsides. Retrieved from https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/is-canned-tuna-healthy Oceanbox Seafood. (2024, March 23). Top 7 Seafood Choices to Enhance Muscle Growth & Performance. Retrieved from https://oceanbox.com/blogs/news/seafood-choices-to-enhance-muscle Times of India. (2020, September 17). Fish vs chicken: What helps you lose weight faster and why?. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/diet/fish-vs-chicken-what-helps-you-lose-weight-faster-and-why/articleshow/78148854.cms

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, canned tuna provides a comparable amount of high-quality protein to fresh tuna. However, fresh tuna can have a slightly higher omega-3 content, and canned tuna may have higher sodium, especially if not rinsed.

Both are excellent for weight loss due to their high protein content, which promotes satiety. Canned tuna packed in water is often slightly lower in calories and fat than cooked chicken breast, which might be an advantage for those strictly counting calories.

Canned tuna is typically much higher in sodium than fresh chicken breast. It is advisable to choose low-sodium canned tuna options or rinse the tuna to reduce the salt content.

As complete protein sources, both tuna and chicken provide all the essential amino acids your body needs for muscle repair and growth. However, tuna provides additional beneficial compounds like omega-3 fatty acids not found in significant amounts in chicken.

For most healthy adults, consuming a few servings of light tuna per week is considered safe. To minimize risk, opt for canned light tuna and limit higher-mercury varieties. Sensitive populations should consult a doctor.

Both are effective for building muscle due to their high-quality protein. Chicken breast has a slightly higher protein content per serving, while tuna provides omega-3s that can help reduce muscle inflammation and improve recovery. For overall muscle growth, both are great choices.

For tuna, use Greek yogurt instead of mayonnaise to make a low-fat tuna salad, or toss it into a green salad with a light vinaigrette. For chicken, grilled or baked chicken breast with roasted vegetables is a simple, effective option.

Canned tuna is typically more affordable than fresh chicken breast, making it a budget-friendly option for increasing protein intake. However, prices can vary based on brand and market conditions.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.