Skip to content

Is Tuna Steak Better Than Salmon? A Nutritional Showdown

5 min read

According to nutritionists, salmon contains significantly more beneficial omega-3 fatty acids than yellowfin tuna. However, determining if tuna steak is better than salmon depends on various factors beyond this single metric, including overall nutritional content, specific health goals, taste preferences, and mercury levels.

Quick Summary

A comparison reveals salmon is rich in heart-healthy omega-3 fats and Vitamin D, while leaner tuna offers more protein with fewer calories. The best choice hinges on personal dietary priorities, taste, cooking style, and mercury sensitivity, especially for certain populations.

Key Points

  • Omega-3 Winner: Salmon is substantially richer in heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids compared to tuna.

  • Lean Protein Power: Tuna provides a higher protein and lower fat content per serving, making it the leaner choice.

  • Mercury Caution: Salmon is a low-mercury seafood, whereas larger tuna species like Bluefin contain higher levels.

  • Taste and Texture: Salmon has a rich, flaky texture and buttery flavor, while tuna is firm, meaty, and milder.

  • Health Goals Matter: The 'better' fish depends on your diet; choose salmon for omega-3s or tuna for lean protein.

  • Cooking Technique: Tuna requires a delicate, high-heat sear to prevent drying out, unlike the more versatile salmon.

In This Article

The Core Nutritional Differences

At a glance, both tuna and salmon are excellent sources of high-quality protein and are packed with vitamins and minerals. However, their primary difference lies in their fat content and, consequently, their macronutrient profiles. Salmon is a fatty fish, while tuna is considerably leaner. This distinction has a domino effect on their calories and key nutrients, making the 'better' choice subjective to your specific health objectives.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Salmon's Clear Advantage

For those prioritizing heart and brain health, salmon is the unequivocal winner. It is loaded with omega-3 fatty acids, particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). These essential fats are linked to lowering blood pressure, reducing inflammation, and improving cholesterol levels. For example, a 3-ounce serving of wild sockeye salmon offers about 1.5 grams of omega-3s, while the same portion of yellowfin tuna contains roughly 0.1 grams. Salmon is also a standout source of Vitamin D, which is crucial for bone health and immune function.

Protein and Calorie Density: Tuna's Lean Muscle

If maximizing protein intake while minimizing fat and calories is your goal, tuna takes the lead. Its muscular, dense flesh translates to a higher protein concentration. A 3-ounce serving of yellowfin tuna provides about 25 grams of protein with only 0.5 grams of fat, compared to wild sockeye salmon’s 22 grams of protein and 6 grams of fat. Tuna is a "protein superstar" for low-calorie diets, also offering substantial amounts of selenium and niacin.

Taste, Texture, and Culinary Applications

Flavor and Texture Profile

  • Salmon: Known for its rich, buttery, and sometimes slightly sweet flavor. Its higher fat content gives it a moist, flaky, and tender texture that can practically melt in your mouth.
  • Tuna: Has a milder, savory, and meatier taste, which makes it a good entry point for those new to seafood. Its texture is much firmer and denser than salmon due to its leanness, feeling more like a steak when cooked.

Cooking Methods

  • Salmon's Versatility: The high fat content in salmon makes it forgiving and versatile. It can be baked, grilled, pan-seared, or roasted without drying out easily. The fat also helps it stand up to bold seasonings and sauces.
  • Tuna's Delicate Nature: Because tuna is so lean, overcooking it can result in a dry, tough texture. It is often best served seared on the outside, leaving the center rare or medium-rare to maintain its moisture. It is also famously served raw in sushi, sashimi, and poke bowls.

Mercury and Sustainability

Mercury Levels

Mercury is a legitimate concern when consuming fish, especially for pregnant women and young children. Here, salmon presents a safer option.

  • Salmon: Considered a "best choice" by the FDA due to its low mercury levels, making it safe for regular consumption.
  • Tuna: Mercury levels vary by species. Larger species like Bluefin and Bigeye have higher mercury content, while canned light tuna (typically skipjack) is on the "best choice" list. Albacore tuna is a "good choice" and should be limited to one serving per week.

Environmental Impact

Sustainability is complex and depends on the specific species and catch methods. Wild-caught Alaskan salmon is often cited as a sustainable choice. Bluefin tuna aquaculture has been criticized for its high environmental impact and overexploitation concerns, though management and sustainability efforts are evolving.

Comparison Table

Feature Tuna Steak (e.g., Yellowfin) Salmon Steak (e.g., Sockeye)
Fat Content Very low (lean fish) Higher (fatty fish)
Omega-3s Very low High
Protein Higher per ounce Slightly lower per ounce
Calories Lower per ounce Higher per ounce
Key Vitamins B6, B12, Niacin D, B12, Folate
Key Minerals Selenium, Zinc, Iron Calcium, Potassium
Taste Mild, savory, and meaty Rich, buttery, and delicate
Texture Firm, dense, steak-like Moist, flaky, tender
Cooking Best seared rare/medium-rare Versatile (grilling, baking, etc.)
Mercury Generally higher, varies by species Low

Conclusion: Which Fish is 'Better' for You?

There is no single winner in the debate of whether tuna steak is better than salmon; the answer depends entirely on your personal preferences and health goals. If your main objective is to maximize intake of anti-inflammatory omega-3s for heart and brain health, salmon is the superior choice. Its richer, flakier texture also appeals to those who enjoy a more classic fish taste. On the other hand, if you are seeking a lean, high-protein source with fewer calories, tuna is the better option. It offers a firmer, meatier texture and a milder flavor, while also being rich in other essential nutrients. Concerns over mercury, particularly for pregnant individuals and children, also make salmon a safer, more consistently low-risk option. Ultimately, incorporating a variety of seafood, as recommended by the American Heart Association, is the best strategy to gain a broad spectrum of nutritional benefits. By considering factors like fat content, nutritional profile, taste, and mercury risk, you can make the most informed decision for your next meal.

Tips for Enjoying Both Seafoods

  • Embrace Variety: Alternate between tuna and salmon to reap the unique nutritional benefits of each while managing mercury exposure from larger tuna species.
  • Perfect Your Sear: When cooking tuna steaks, a quick, high-heat sear on each side will prevent it from drying out. A rare to medium-rare center is key.
  • Bake for Flakiness: For salmon, baking at a moderate temperature helps preserve its moist, flaky texture. Add a simple lemon and dill topping for a classic preparation.
  • Mind the Canned Fish: Canned light tuna is a low-mercury, high-protein choice, while canned salmon offers more omega-3s and sometimes calcium (if bones are included).
  • Use Bold Flavors with Salmon: Salmon's robust flavor pairs well with stronger sauces and marinades, like teriyaki or mustard-dill, that might overwhelm tuna's milder taste.
  • Consider Mercury Context: Pay attention to the type of tuna. Smaller, canned light varieties are safer for frequent consumption than larger, fresh bluefin tuna.

The Final Verdict

Your personal health objectives and taste will dictate which of these two nutritious fish is the ideal choice. Salmon is the omega-3 powerhouse, while tuna is the lean protein champion. Both can be a part of a healthy, balanced diet.

Visit the Healthline page on tuna vs salmon for further nutritional details.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, salmon is consistently a fattier fish than tuna, and this is the primary reason for its higher omega-3 and calorie content per serving.

While both are excellent protein sources, tuna generally contains more protein per ounce than salmon due to its leaner, more muscular composition.

Salmon is a low-mercury fish and is considered a 'best choice' by health organizations. Large tuna species like Bluefin have higher levels, though canned light tuna is much lower.

The best way to cook a tuna steak is with a quick, high-heat sear, leaving the inside rare to medium-rare. This prevents the lean fish from becoming dry and tough.

Canned salmon typically provides more omega-3s and calcium (if bones are included), while canned light tuna offers a leaner protein option with lower mercury levels.

Yes, dietitians recommend eating a variety of fish to get a wide range of nutrients. Alternating between salmon and low-mercury tuna varieties is a good strategy for a balanced diet.

Not always. While wild-caught fish often have specific benefits, like higher omega-3s in some wild salmon, farmed fish can sometimes have a lower environmental impact and different nutritional profiles depending on the farming method.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.