Skip to content

The Three Types of Feeding Methods Explained

3 min read

According to the American College of Gastroenterology, enteral nutrition is generally preferred over parenteral when the gastrointestinal tract is functional, and oral feeding is always the first choice. This guide explains what are the three types of feeding methods, detailing the distinct differences between oral, enteral, and parenteral approaches to delivering nutrition.

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the three primary feeding methods used in medicine: oral, enteral, and parenteral. It examines the use cases for each method, from conventional eating to specialized intravenous delivery, to address malnutrition or insufficient caloric intake.

Key Points

  • Oral Nutrition Support: This method uses the mouth for nutrient intake, often through supplemental shakes or fortified foods, when a patient can eat but needs additional calories.

  • Enteral Nutrition: When the GI tract works but oral intake is unsafe or insufficient, enteral feeding delivers liquid formula directly to the stomach or small intestine via a tube.

  • Parenteral Nutrition: For patients with a non-functional or inaccessible GI tract, this method delivers a complete nutrient solution intravenously, bypassing the digestive system entirely.

  • Prioritizing Methods: Oral feeding is always preferred, followed by enteral, with parenteral nutrition reserved for when the GI tract cannot be used.

  • Risks and Benefits: Each method carries different risks, including infection with invasive procedures, and must be selected based on the patient’s specific medical condition.

  • Multidisciplinary Care: Successful nutritional management requires a team of healthcare professionals, including dietitians, nurses, and doctors, to ensure the right approach is used.

  • Transitional Steps: Patients on enteral or parenteral support are gradually transitioned back to oral feeding as their condition improves and their digestive system recovers functionality.

In This Article

Understanding the Three Primary Feeding Methods

Nutritional support is a crucial aspect of patient care, particularly for those who are unable to meet their dietary needs through normal consumption. In clinical settings, the three types of feeding methods—oral, enteral, and parenteral—serve distinct purposes and are selected based on a patient's specific health condition and the functionality of their gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Oral feeding, which is the most natural method, is always prioritized. When this is not possible or sufficient, other methods are used to deliver essential nutrients, vitamins, and minerals. This article explores these three fundamental methods, their applications, and key considerations for each.

Oral Nutrition Support (ONS)

Oral nutrition support involves providing nutrients through the mouth, often using liquid supplements when regular food intake is insufficient. This method is suitable for patients who can eat but require additional nutrition due to illness, recovery, or risk of malnutrition. It can also be used during the transition back to a full diet after other feeding methods.

Enteral Nutrition (Tube Feeding)

Enteral nutrition delivers liquid nutrition directly into the GI tract via a tube when oral intake is not possible but the gut is functional. Tubes can be placed through the nose into the stomach or small intestine, or surgically through the abdominal wall. Delivery methods include bolus feeding (mimicking meals), continuous feeding (slow drip over hours), or cyclic feeding (over a set period, like overnight).

Parenteral Nutrition (Intravenous Feeding)

Parenteral nutrition involves providing nutrients directly into the bloodstream intravenously, bypassing the GI tract entirely. This method is used when the GI tract is non-functional or inaccessible, such as with severe bowel obstruction or conditions requiring bowel rest. The solution, called total parenteral nutrition (TPN), contains a mix of carbohydrates, proteins, fats, electrolytes, vitamins, and minerals. It is indicated for non-functional GI tracts, pre-operative preparation of malnourished patients, or prolonged bowel rest.

Comparison of the Three Feeding Methods

Selecting the appropriate feeding method requires understanding the differences based on the patient's condition and GI function.

Feature Oral Nutrition Support Enteral Nutrition Parenteral Nutrition
Route Mouth Tube into GI tract Intravenous (vein)
GI Tract Function Partially or fully functional Functional Non-functional or inaccessible
Primary Use Case Supplementing an inadequate oral diet When oral intake is insufficient or unsafe, but the gut works When the GI tract cannot be used
Delivery Method Drinking or sipping Bolus, continuous, or cyclic infusion Continuous IV infusion
Cost Least expensive Moderately expensive Most expensive
Infection Risk Low Low to moderate (site care needed) Higher (due to venous access)
Monitoring Minimal, regular weight checks Routine checks for tube patency, tolerance, and insertion site Intensive lab work for electrolyte balance and organ function
Complications Mild intolerance, taste fatigue Aspiration, tube blockage, diarrhea Infection, blood clots, liver complications

The Importance of a Multidisciplinary Approach

Managing feeding methods requires a healthcare team, including dietitians to assess needs and recommend formulas, and nurses and doctors to manage administration and monitor for complications.

A Final Note on Patient-Centered Care

Ethical considerations and patient autonomy are crucial in nutrition support decisions, especially for vulnerable patients. The goal is to align interventions with the patient's wishes and enhance their quality of life.

Conclusion

The three feeding methods—oral, enteral, and parenteral—provide essential nutritional support tailored to a patient's ability to use their GI tract. Oral is the preferred method, followed by enteral when the gut is functional but oral intake is not possible, and parenteral when the GI tract is non-functional. Proper selection and management by a clinical nutrition team are vital for safe and effective care.

Source for Further Reading: BAPEN: Understanding the difference between enteral and parenteral nutrition

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary difference lies in the delivery route: enteral feeding uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract via a tube, while parenteral feeding delivers nutrients directly into the bloodstream intravenously, bypassing the GI tract.

A patient may need enteral nutrition if they cannot safely chew or swallow food (e.g., after a stroke or with certain cancers) but their GI tract is still functioning properly.

TPN is a complete nutrient solution administered intravenously when a patient cannot use their digestive system at all. It provides all essential calories, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals.

Key risks include infection related to the catheter site, blood clots, and metabolic complications like hyperglycemia and liver problems.

The healthcare team decides based on the patient's ability to swallow, the function and accessibility of their GI tract, and their overall nutritional needs. Oral intake is always the first choice, followed by enteral, then parenteral.

Common types include nasogastric tubes (NGTs), which go through the nose into the stomach, and gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes), which are surgically placed directly into the stomach for longer-term feeding.

Yes, it is a common practice to transition a patient from parenteral to enteral feeding, and eventually to oral intake, as their GI function recovers. The transition is done gradually under medical supervision.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.