Skip to content

Understanding What is Red Dye Number 3? A Guide to a Healthier Nutrition Diet

4 min read

In January 2025, the FDA finally banned Red Dye No. 3 from food and ingested drugs in the United States, a move that followed decades of inaction on a known health concern. For many consumers, this raises the important question: what is red dye number 3 and what does its elimination mean for their nutritional choices?

Quick Summary

Red Dye No. 3, a petroleum-derived synthetic color additive, has been removed from the list of FDA-approved ingredients for food and drugs based on animal studies linking it to cancer. The ban pushes manufacturers toward natural alternatives, encouraging a move away from ultra-processed foods.

Key Points

  • Petroleum-Based Dye: Red Dye No. 3, also known as erythrosine, is a synthetic color additive derived from petroleum, used for a vibrant red hue.

  • Animal Carcinogen: Animal studies from the 1980s linked high doses of Red Dye No. 3 to thyroid cancer in male rats, prompting its ban in cosmetics in 1990.

  • Recent FDA Ban: The FDA officially banned Red Dye No. 3 for use in food, beverages, and ingested drugs in January 2025, with compliance deadlines in 2027 and 2028.

  • Health Risks: Health concerns associated with the dye include potential links to thyroid dysfunction and neurobehavioral issues, though evidence on human effects varies.

  • How to Identify: Until the ban is fully effective, consumers can identify the dye on labels as "FD&C Red No. 3" or "erythrosine".

  • Cleaner Alternatives: Manufacturers are transitioning to natural alternatives like beet juice, purple sweet potato extract, and carmine.

  • Encourages Clean Eating: Avoiding products with Red Dye No. 3 often means choosing less processed foods, aligning with a cleaner eating nutrition diet.

In This Article

What is Red Dye Number 3?

Red Dye No. 3, also known as Erythrosine or FD&C Red No. 3, is a synthetic color additive derived from petroleum. Its primary function has been to provide a bright cherry-red color to various products, including food, ingested drugs, and cosmetics since the early 20th century. The use of this dye is purely for aesthetic appeal in items like candy, cakes, and other processed foods.

The Controversial History of Red No. 3

Concerns about the health risks of Red Dye No. 3 have been present for many years. A significant development occurred in the 1980s when animal studies showed that high levels of the dye could cause thyroid tumors in male rats. This finding invoked the Delaney Clause, which requires the FDA to prohibit food or color additives that cause cancer in humans or animals.

Following these studies, in 1990, the FDA prohibited Red No. 3 in cosmetics and externally applied drugs. However, the ban did not extend to food and ingested drugs at that time, leading to a situation where a known animal carcinogen remained in food for over 30 years. During this period, regions like the European Union, Australia, and Japan implemented stricter regulations, with Europe largely banning the dye for food use in 1994.

Health Concerns Associated with Red Dye No. 3

Besides the link to cancer in animal studies, other potential health issues have been associated with Red Dye No. 3:

  • Thyroid Dysfunction: Some research indicates the dye might interfere with the thyroid gland's iodine absorption, potentially affecting hormone balance. Animal studies observed enlarged, tumorous thyroid glands and hormone irregularities after exposure.
  • Neurobehavioral Effects: There are increasing concerns about the effects of synthetic dyes on children's behavior. While some studies, like those from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, have connected artificial food dyes to hyperactivity, the evidence specifically for Red No. 3 in humans is not yet definitive.
  • Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: Rodent studies have suggested that Red No. 3 could increase oxidative stress and cause neuroinflammation, damaging tissues and disrupting neural communication.

Where was Red Dye No. 3 found?

Prior to the recent ban, Red Dye No. 3 was commonly used in various processed products. These included items such as maraschino cherries, baked goods like cakes and frostings, candies including candy corn, frozen desserts and ice pops, fruit cocktails and flavored milks, some vegetarian meat products and bacon bits, and ingested medications and supplements like gummy vitamins.

The FDA Ban: A New Era for Food Safety

In January 2025, the FDA announced it would revoke the authorization for Red No. 3 in food, beverages, and ingested drugs. This action followed pressure from consumer groups and scientific review, finally addressing the regulatory gap that existed for over 30 years since the cosmetic ban.

The ban includes a timeline for manufacturers to comply:

  • Food and Beverages: Manufacturers have until January 2027 to remove the dye from their products.
  • Ingested Drugs: Companies have until January 2028 to reformulate medications.

This decision signifies a movement toward safer food additives and is considered a success by public health advocates like the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), who called it a resolution to a "decades-long regulatory failure".

The Clean Eating Movement and Red Dye Alternatives

The FDA's ban supports the principles of clean eating, which focuses on consuming whole, minimally processed foods free from artificial additives. Consumers now have a clear reason to avoid products that previously contained Red No. 3 and look for alternatives.

Manufacturers are increasingly using natural colorings. These alternatives include beet juice, which provides red hues; purple sweet potato and red cabbage extracts for various red and purple shades; carmine, a red dye from cochineal insects (not vegan-friendly); and paprika oleoresin, which gives an orangey-red color.

Comparison of Red Dye No. 3 vs. Natural Alternatives

Feature Red Dye No. 3 (Erythrosine) Natural Alternatives (Beet Juice, Carmine, etc.)
Origin Synthetic, petroleum-based Plant-based (beet juice) or insect-derived (carmine)
Health Concerns Linked to thyroid cancer in animal studies; potential neurobehavioral effects Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status; minimal health concerns
Regulatory Status (US) Banned for food use (Jan 2025), ban effective 2027/2028 Permitted for use by the FDA as safe food additives
Regulatory Status (EU) Restricted or banned in most food applications since 1994 Widely approved for use
Taste Impact No flavor added May impart subtle flavor notes depending on the source

Navigating a Post-Red Dye No. 3 World

With Red Dye No. 3 being phased out, it's a good time to adopt cleaner eating habits. Consider these steps:

  1. Read Labels Carefully: Until the ban is fully implemented, check ingredient lists for "FD&C Red No. 3," "FD&C Red 3," or "erythrosine."
  2. Choose Whole Foods: Prioritize a diet based on whole, unprocessed ingredients like fruits and vegetables.
  3. Support Clean Brands: Opt for companies already using natural colorings to encourage broader adoption of safer practices.
  4. DIY Cooking and Baking: Prepare your own food to control ingredients and use natural colorings from sources like beets.

Conclusion

The upcoming removal of Red Dye No. 3 from the U.S. food supply marks a notable achievement for public health and underscores the benefits of a cleaner nutrition diet. The history of this synthetic additive, its link to cancer in animals, and the eventual FDA ban highlight the importance of being aware of ingredients in processed foods. By understanding the risks and choosing products with natural colorings, consumers can contribute positively to their health and encourage the food industry towards safer, more open practices. For further details on the ban and the advocacy efforts, resources from organizations like the CSPI are available.

Frequently Asked Questions

While animal studies showed Red Dye No. 3 caused cancer, leading to its ban in cosmetics in 1990, the FDA initially delayed action on food and ingested drugs due to internal processes and industry pressure. This created a decades-long regulatory paradox until consumer advocacy and state-level bans prompted a federal response in January 2025.

No, Red Dye No. 3 and Red Dye No. 40 are distinct synthetic dyes. Red Dye No. 40, also known as Allura Red, is still widely used in many food products, although some studies have raised separate concerns about its health effects.

You can check the ingredient list on a product's label for names like "FD&C Red No. 3," "FD&C Red 3," or "erythrosine." All color additives are legally required to be listed by name.

Common natural alternatives used by manufacturers include beet juice, carmine (from insects), and extracts from sources like purple sweet potato, paprika, and red cabbage.

No, manufacturers have until January 2027 to reformulate food and beverage products and until January 2028 for ingested drugs. Products containing the dye will remain on shelves until these deadlines.

Yes, young children may be more vulnerable to food dyes due to their smaller body weight. Some studies have suggested a potential link between synthetic dyes and hyperactivity in sensitive children, though research is ongoing.

Yes, since Red Dye No. 3 is primarily found in ultra-processed, sugary foods, intentionally avoiding it often means shifting towards a diet richer in whole foods, which is beneficial for overall health.

No, since Red Dye No. 3 is only used for coloring, not flavor, its removal will not alter a product's taste. The primary change will be in the visual appearance, with some foods possibly becoming paler.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.