Skip to content

What is the difference between AG1 and Zena Greens?

4 min read

Greens powders can be a valuable addition to a diet, but transparency varies greatly between brands. This guide explores what is the difference between AG1 and Zena Greens, focusing on their unique formulations, ingredient sourcing, cost, and certifications to help you make an informed decision for your health goals.

Quick Summary

AG1 provides a comprehensive, vitamin-rich formula with high probiotic transparency, while Zena Greens emphasizes its USDA Organic ingredients and is a more budget-friendly alternative. Key contrasts exist in certifications, specific ingredients like adaptogens or hydration blends, and overall cost.

Key Points

  • Cost Difference: AG1 is significantly more expensive than Zena Greens, making Zena a more budget-friendly choice.

  • Ingredient Transparency: AG1 discloses its probiotic count (10B CFU) and vitamin breakdown, while Zena does not provide this specific information for its proprietary blends.

  • Certifications: AG1 is NSF Certified for Sport, a key consideration for athletes, while Zena Greens is USDA Organic, appealing to those who prioritize organic sourcing.

  • Formula Focus: Zena Greens includes a specific hydration blend with coconut water powder, a feature AG1 does not emphasize.

  • Convenience Options: Both offer convenient on-the-go packaging, with AG1 providing travel packs and Zena Greens offering individual stick packs.

  • Allergen Concerns: Zena Greens warns that it is manufactured in a facility processing common allergens, a crucial detail for those with sensitivities.

In This Article

Ingredient Profiles: A Tale of Two Formulations

Both AG1 (formerly Athletic Greens) and Zena Greens pack a substantial number of ingredients into their daily serving, but their philosophical approach to formulation differs. AG1 is renowned for its all-in-one blend, featuring approximately 75 high-quality ingredients sourced from whole foods. These are organized into several proprietary blends, covering areas like a superfood complex, a dairy-free probiotic complex, and a blend of adaptogens and mushrooms. A key piece of transparency that AG1 provides is the CFU count for its probiotics, a notable 10 billion CFU per serving. However, like Zena, it relies on proprietary blends where specific ingredient quantities are not disclosed, meaning it's unclear if some components are present in effective doses.

In contrast, Zena Greens boasts over 70 organic superfoods, including greens, fruits, vegetables, and a unique hydration blend featuring coconut water powder. It also contains several strains of probiotics and digestive enzymes. A significant distinction is Zena's inclusion of a small amount of plant-based protein, a feature not typically found in AG1. A major drawback, however, is that Zena does not disclose the amount of probiotics in CFUs, nor does it list the specific vitamin and mineral content beyond general blend descriptions. This lack of quantitative information makes it difficult for consumers to assess the true potency of the product.

Proprietary Blends and Transparency

While both companies utilize proprietary blends, the level of ingredient disclosure varies. AG1 provides a detailed list of vitamins and minerals, often exceeding daily value recommendations for many essential micronutrients. Zena is less transparent about its micronutrient breakdown, focusing instead on its expansive list of organic ingredients.

Certifications, Quality, and Manufacturing Standards

Quality and safety are paramount when choosing a supplement, and both brands address this in different ways.

  • AG1: Is NSF Certified for Sport, a significant credential for athletes, ensuring the product is free of banned substances. It is manufactured in a GMP-certified facility and undergoes third-party testing.
  • Zena Greens: Carries the USDA Organic certification, appealing to consumers who prioritize organic sourcing. It also states that its products are third-party tested. However, it is manufactured in a facility that processes common allergens like tree nuts, peanuts, soy, and wheat, which is a critical consideration for those with sensitivities.

Taste, Flavor Options, and Sweeteners

Taste is a highly subjective but important factor for a daily supplement. AG1 has a default earthy flavor with hints of pineapple and vanilla, which is either well-tolerated or disliked by users. Newer, distinct flavors like Berry, Citrus, and Tropical have been introduced. Zena Greens comes in multiple fruity flavors, including Mixed Berry, Mango, and Green Apple, which many find more palatable and refreshing. Both products are sweetened with stevia, and some users find the resulting taste too sweet or artificial. Texture can be an issue for both, with reports of grittiness if not mixed thoroughly.

Cost and Affordability

For many, the price difference is the most significant factor. AG1 is a premium-priced product, with a 30-serving supply costing around $79-$99, depending on subscription status. This makes it one of the most expensive greens powders on the market. Zena Greens is positioned as a budget-friendly alternative, with a 30-serving tub costing significantly less, often in the $22-$34 range. This price point can be very appealing, especially for those new to greens powders or on a tighter budget.

Convenience and Accessibility

AG1 is available in a large pouch for home use and convenient travel packs for on-the-go consumption. Zena Greens is available in tubs and also offers individual stick packs, which are highly praised for their portability. Both offer subscription services and are available online. AG1 has a wider international shipping presence, whereas Zena primarily ships within the United States.

Comparison Table

Feature AG1 Zena Greens
Ingredient Count ~75-80 ingredients 70+ organic ingredients
Key Ingredient Focus Comprehensive vitamins, minerals, adaptogens, probiotics Organic greens, fruits, vegetables, hydration blend, plant protein
Probiotic Count 10 billion CFU disclosed Undisclosed CFU count
Key Certifications NSF Certified for Sport, GMP USDA Organic, Third-Party Tested
Cost (30-Servings) $79-$99 (Premium) $22-$34 (Budget-friendly)
Flavor Options Original (Earthy), Berry, Citrus, Tropical Mixed Berry, Mango, Green Apple
Convenience Pouch and travel packs Tubs and individual stick packs
Manufacturing Warning Contains soy-derived lecithin Processed in a facility with allergens (soy, wheat, nuts)

Conclusion: Which Greens Powder Is Right For You?

Choosing between AG1 and Zena Greens depends on your priorities and budget. If you are an athlete or demand a highly-vetted product with NSF certification and detailed probiotic information, AG1, despite its higher cost, is the more transparent and suitable choice. It serves as a robust all-in-one nutritional supplement designed for high performance.

However, if your primary goal is a budget-friendly, USDA Organic supplement and you prioritize hydration support, Zena Greens is a compelling option. Its fruity flavors and individual stick packs offer great convenience. The trade-off is less transparency on specific nutrient potencies and probiotic counts. Ultimately, neither product is a substitute for a whole-foods diet, but either can effectively help fill potential nutrient gaps. For more information on greens powders, consider consulting reliable nutritional resources.

How to Choose

To decide, assess your needs based on:

  1. Budget: If cost is a major factor, Zena Greens offers better value.
  2. Ingredient Priorities: If you want organic and hydration-focused benefits, choose Zena. If a broad spectrum of vitamins/minerals and adaptogens is key, AG1 is better.
  3. Transparency: AG1 provides more detail on probiotics, which may be important for gut health focus.
  4. Certifications: Competitive athletes should lean towards AG1 for its NSF certification. Those prioritizing organic ingredients should choose Zena.

Ultimately, a greens powder should complement a balanced, whole-food diet, not replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

AG1 discloses its probiotic content at 10 billion CFU, providing greater transparency regarding its gut-health benefits. Zena Greens includes probiotics and prebiotics but does not specify the CFU count, making it harder to evaluate its specific potency.

Zena Greens is considerably more affordable than AG1. A monthly supply of Zena is priced significantly lower than AG1, making it a more budget-friendly option for daily nutrition.

Neither AG1 nor Zena Greens contain added sugars or artificial sweeteners. Both use stevia for sweetness, with some users finding the taste of both products excessively sweet or having an aftertaste.

AG1 is NSF Certified for Sport, which means it is rigorously tested for banned substances and is widely trusted by athletes. Zena Greens is not listed as having this certification, making AG1 the more dependable choice for competitive athletes.

Zena Greens explicitly includes an "Organic Hydration Blend" with coconut water powder, positioning itself as a supplement designed to support hydration. While AG1 contains electrolytes, it does not feature a dedicated hydration blend.

No, neither AG1 nor Zena Greens should be used as a replacement for whole fruits and vegetables. They can help fill potential nutritional gaps, but they do not provide the same fiber, hydration, and overall benefits of a balanced whole-food diet.

Flavor preference is subjective. Zena offers multiple fruity options (Mixed Berry, Mango, Green Apple), while AG1 has an earthy, pineapple/vanilla base flavor. Both can have a gritty or chalky texture, and some find the stevia-based sweetness unpleasant.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.