Skip to content

What is the Difference Between MAM and SAM?

4 min read

Globally, an estimated 33 million children under five suffer from Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM), while 19 million are affected by Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM). The distinction between these two forms is not just a matter of degree; it critically impacts the diagnosis, management, and ultimate prognosis for affected individuals.

Quick Summary

Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) and Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) are distinct forms of acute malnutrition defined by different anthropometric measurements and clinical signs. Their key differences determine the level of urgency, type of therapeutic care, and location of treatment required for recovery.

Key Points

  • Severity Level: MAM is moderate, while SAM is the most severe and life-threatening form of acute malnutrition.

  • Diagnostic Criteria: MAM and SAM are distinguished by specific anthropometric measurements (WHZ and MUAC) and the presence of bilateral pitting oedema.

  • Treatment Type: MAM is managed with supplementary feeding (RUSF), whereas SAM requires therapeutic feeding (RUTF) and sometimes inpatient medical care.

  • Risk of Mortality: The risk of death is significantly higher for children with SAM compared to those with MAM.

  • Management Setting: MAM can often be treated on an outpatient, community-based level, while complicated SAM cases require facility-based inpatient treatment.

  • Resource Allocation: The distinction helps health programs allocate specialized resources appropriately, focusing intensive care on those with SAM.

In This Article

Understanding Acute Malnutrition

Acute malnutrition, often referred to as wasting, is a rapid weight loss or failure to gain weight, primarily caused by insufficient food intake and/or frequent infectious diseases. It is a critical public health issue that disproportionately affects children under five years old, especially in low- and middle-income countries. To effectively address this issue, health organizations classify acute malnutrition into two main categories: Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) and Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM), each with specific diagnostic and treatment protocols developed by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM)

MAM represents a less severe stage of acute malnutrition, but it is not a condition to be taken lightly. It can easily progress into the more dangerous SAM if left unaddressed. Children with MAM are at a significantly higher risk of mortality and can experience slower physical and cognitive development compared to well-nourished children.

Diagnostic Criteria for MAM

Diagnosis is primarily based on anthropometric measurements, specifically for children aged 6 to 59 months:

  • Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ): A WHZ between -3 and -2 standard deviations below the median WHO child growth standards.
  • Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC): A MUAC between 115 mm and <125 mm.
  • Nutritional Oedema: The absence of bilateral pitting oedema is a key differentiator from SAM.

Treatment for MAM

Treatment for MAM is often less intensive and can typically be managed in outpatient, community-based settings through supplementary feeding programs. It involves providing specific nutritional support to supplement the child's home diet and prevent further deterioration.

  • Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF): These are specifically formulated, energy-dense pastes designed to provide high-quality protein, energy, and micronutrients to children with MAM.
  • Fortified Blended Flours (FBF): Another form of supplementary food, often used in food-insecure contexts, though RUSF has been shown to be superior in promoting recovery.
  • Nutrition Counseling: Education and support for caregivers on optimal infant and young child feeding practices are crucial components of management.

Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM)

SAM is the most life-threatening form of acute malnutrition and requires urgent, specialized medical attention. It is associated with a drastically higher risk of mortality due to complications like infections, organ failure, and poor appetite.

Diagnostic Criteria for SAM

Diagnosis for SAM involves more critical anthropometric and clinical indicators:

  • Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ): A WHZ of less than -3 standard deviations below the median WHO child growth standards.
  • Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC): A MUAC of less than 115 mm.
  • Bilateral Pitting Oedema: The presence of this type of swelling on both feet is a direct clinical sign of SAM, regardless of the WHZ or MUAC.

Treatment for SAM

Treatment for SAM is highly specialized and depends on the presence of complications. Uncomplicated cases may be managed in outpatient therapeutic programs (OTP), while complicated cases require inpatient care.

  • Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF): A high-energy, nutrient-dense paste used for outpatient treatment of uncomplicated SAM. It has been shown to significantly increase recovery rates.
  • Inpatient Care: For cases with complications like severe infections, dehydration, or poor appetite, initial stabilization and treatment take place in a specialized facility, often following the WHO's 10-step protocol.
  • Antibiotics and Supportive Care: Treating underlying infections and providing supportive care are critical to managing SAM and reducing mortality risk.

MAM vs. SAM: A Comparison Table

Feature Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM)
Severity Less severe, lower risk of complications Highly severe, extremely high risk of death
Diagnostic Criteria WHZ between -3 and -2 SD; MUAC between 115 mm and <125 mm WHZ < -3 SD; MUAC < 115 mm; or presence of bilateral pitting oedema
Clinical Signs May present with moderate wasting; no oedema Severe wasting and/or bilateral pitting oedema
Treatment Setting Primarily community-based or supplementary feeding programs Community-based for uncomplicated cases; inpatient for complicated cases
Key Food Product Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF) Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF)
Duration of Treatment Typically shorter-term, until recovery is achieved Usually longer-term and more intensive, with higher relapse risk
Risk of Death Increased risk compared to well-nourished children, but lower than SAM Approximately 10 times higher risk of death compared to well-nourished children

Why The Distinction Matters

Distinguishing between MAM and SAM is fundamentally important for directing appropriate medical and nutritional interventions. The resources and level of care required differ significantly, from the less-intensive supplementary feeding for MAM to the urgent, highly specialized therapeutic feeding and medical care for SAM. Early and accurate classification helps ensure that scarce resources are allocated effectively, and critically, that children receive the right treatment at the right time. Proper management of MAM is also a critical preventative strategy, as it can help stop a child from deteriorating into a state of SAM. As the World Health Organization continues to refine guidelines for acute malnutrition, a clear understanding of the difference between MAM and SAM is vital for healthcare providers, policymakers, and aid workers to improve child survival and developmental outcomes. [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK361900/]

Conclusion

The difference between MAM and SAM is a critical distinction that dictates the severity of a child's nutritional state and the appropriate course of treatment. While MAM signifies a moderate level of wasting that can often be reversed with supplementary feeding and nutritional education, SAM is a medical emergency demanding intensive, specialized care, often including hospitalization. By using standardized anthropometric criteria and clinical signs, health workers can accurately diagnose the condition and implement life-saving interventions. Recognizing the different needs and risks associated with each condition is essential for effective global health strategies aimed at reducing child mortality and improving long-term health outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary diagnostic differences include specific cut-off points for Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) and Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC). The presence of bilateral pitting oedema is a key clinical sign that exclusively indicates SAM.

Health workers typically measure a child's weight and height to calculate the WHZ and measure the Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC). They also physically check for bilateral pitting oedema, a tell-tale sign of SAM.

RUSF stands for Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food, used to treat Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM). RUTF stands for Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food, a higher-energy product for treating Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM).

Yes, MAM is a less severe condition than SAM. However, MAM still carries a higher risk of mortality and developmental issues compared to a healthy child, and it can progress to SAM without intervention.

A child with SAM and complications like severe infection or poor appetite requires inpatient treatment in a specialized facility. This is different from uncomplicated SAM, which can sometimes be managed in the community.

Yes, a child with MAM can deteriorate into SAM if their condition is not properly managed or if their nutritional intake and health status continue to worsen.

Bilateral pitting oedema is a type of swelling that occurs on both feet. When pressed, the indentation remains for a few seconds. Its presence in a child indicates Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM).

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.