Skip to content

What is the difference between the food pyramid and the Eatwell guide?

4 min read

First introduced in Sweden in 1974, the food pyramid revolutionized dietary advice by using a simple visual to illustrate a balanced diet. However, modern nutrition science and evolving dietary patterns led to the creation of more up-to-date models, such as the UK's Eatwell Guide, which offers a practical, plate-based approach for healthy eating.

Quick Summary

The food pyramid and Eatwell Guide are visual tools for healthy eating, but they differ significantly in their visual representation, food group proportions, specific dietary messages, and historical context. The plate-based Eatwell Guide provides a modern, evidence-based approach, emphasizing fruits, vegetables, and hydration, while the older pyramid model often prioritized carbohydrates, leading to outdated dietary advice.

Key Points

  • Visual Representation: The Food Pyramid uses a tiered triangle to show food proportions, while the Eatwell Guide uses a segmented plate for better visualization.

  • Carbohydrate Emphasis: Older food pyramids placed a heavy emphasis on carbohydrates, often failing to differentiate between refined and wholegrain options.

  • Modern Evidence-Base: The Eatwell Guide was developed based on updated nutritional science, including recommendations from the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition.

  • Fats, Salts & Sugars: The Eatwell Guide explicitly places high fat, salt, and sugar foods outside the main diagram, unlike the older pyramid's top tier.

  • Practicality: The plate-based visual of the Eatwell Guide is often considered more practical and intuitive for planning meals compared to the hierarchical food pyramid.

  • Hydration: The Eatwell Guide includes specific advice on drinking fluids, a component largely absent from the visual representation of older food pyramids.

  • Evolution of Dietary Advice: The replacement of the food pyramid by models like the Eatwell Guide reflects a shift away from high-carb, low-fat diets toward a more balanced, whole-foods approach.

In This Article

The Food Pyramid's Legacy: A Historical Perspective

The food pyramid, a representation of optimal serving sizes, gained international prominence with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) model in 1992. This model, with its broad base of grains (bread, cereal, rice, and pasta) and smaller top tiers for fats, oils, and sweets, was designed to guide Americans toward healthier eating. The visual suggested a hierarchy of consumption, with the most-eaten foods at the bottom.

However, this historical model faced significant criticism over time. Critics pointed out its heavy emphasis on carbohydrates, without distinguishing between whole grains and refined, processed versions. A slice of nutritionally sparse white bread was equated to a serving of brown rice, a comparison now widely considered inaccurate. The original pyramid also lacked guidance on healthier fat choices and specific hydration advice. The visual's recommendations, some argued, were influenced by industry lobbying rather than pure nutritional science, contributing to an over-reliance on carbohydrates and subsequent metabolic health issues. The USDA eventually recognized these flaws, replacing the pyramid first with the striped MyPyramid in 2005 and later with the plate-based MyPlate in 2011, signaling a shift in dietary thinking.

The Eatwell Guide: A Modern, Plate-Based Approach

In the UK, the national food guide has also evolved, moving from the 'Balance of Good Health' (1994) to the 'eatwell plate' (2007) and, finally, the current Eatwell Guide in 2016. This evolution reflects an updated, evidence-based understanding of nutrition, incorporating advice from the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN). The Eatwell Guide visually represents how different food groups should proportionally contribute to a healthy, balanced diet over the course of a day or week, not necessarily every single meal.

The guide uses a plate divided into five segments to illustrate the proportion of each food group. This plate-based imagery is often seen as more intuitive and practical for planning meals compared to the tiered pyramid. A key feature of the Eatwell Guide is the placement of foods high in fat, salt, and sugar outside the main plate image, emphasizing that they are not a necessary part of a healthy diet and should be consumed infrequently and in small amounts.

Eatwell Guide Food Groups

  • Fruits and Vegetables: This is the largest segment, recommending at least five portions a day and emphasizing variety.
  • Starchy Carbohydrates: Occupying a significant portion, this segment highlights wholegrain versions of potatoes, bread, rice, and pasta for their higher fiber content.
  • Proteins: This group includes beans, pulses, fish, eggs, meat, and other proteins, with specific advice to eat two portions of fish per week, one of which should be oily.
  • Dairy and Alternatives: Recommends consuming some dairy, suggesting lower-fat and lower-sugar options.
  • Oils and Spreads: Advised for consumption in small amounts, favoring unsaturated options.

A Detailed Comparison: Food Pyramid vs. Eatwell Guide

To better understand the distinct philosophies behind these two nutritional models, let's examine their core differences in a comparative table.

Feature Historical Food Pyramid (e.g., USDA 1992) Eatwell Guide (UK, 2016)
Visual Model A tiered, triangular pyramid A segmented plate divided into food groups
Primary Message Emphasized a hierarchical structure, with the base (grains) consumed most Promotes balanced proportions of food groups over a day or week
Carbohydrates Placed at the wide base, suggesting high quantity, often without distinguishing whole vs. refined Recommends high-fiber, wholegrain options and gives equal visual weight to fruits/vegetables
Fats & Sugars Placed at the small top, to be eaten sparingly, but often grouped together High fat, salt, and sugar items are excluded from the main plate image, stressing they are not a diet necessity
Hydration Generally not included in the main visual or guidance Explicitly includes a hydration message (6-8 glasses of fluid)
Specific Advice Less specific guidance on food types within groups (e.g., all grains treated equally) Specific recommendations for fish, lower-fat dairy, and whole grains
Modern Context Obsolete in the US, replaced by plate-based models due to criticism A modern, evidence-based tool reflecting current nutritional advice

The Evolution of Dietary Advice

The shift from the pyramid to the plate, exemplified by the UK's progression to the Eatwell Guide, is more than a simple visual change. It marks a fundamental change in dietary philosophy, moving from broad, sometimes outdated recommendations towards a more nuanced, evidence-based approach. While the food pyramid was a pioneering tool for its time, its limitations, particularly its overemphasis on refined carbohydrates and lack of distinction for fat quality, became increasingly apparent.

The Eatwell Guide offers a more practical and effective model for public health. By presenting a meal on a plate, it encourages a more intuitive understanding of balanced portion sizes. The focus on high-fiber carbohydrates, ample fruits and vegetables, and clear guidance on limiting unhealthy fats and sugars aligns with modern nutritional science and public health goals to combat obesity and chronic disease. The guide's inclusion of hydration and an underlying focus on sustainability further solidifies its position as a comprehensive, forward-thinking tool. For more detailed information on the guide, you can visit the official NHS Eatwell Guide page.

Conclusion

The food pyramid and the Eatwell Guide both serve as visual aids for healthy eating, but they are products of different eras and nutritional understandings. The food pyramid, with its grain-heavy foundation, represents an earlier, now-criticized approach. The Eatwell Guide, in contrast, provides a modern, evidence-based, and user-friendly plate-based model that better reflects current dietary recommendations. The differences highlight the evolution of nutritional science, underscoring the importance of basing dietary choices on up-to-date, comprehensive advice for optimal health. Following the Eatwell Guide's principles is widely regarded as a superior approach for achieving a balanced and healthy diet in the modern era.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Eatwell Guide is more current. It was introduced in the UK in 2016 and represents the most up-to-date, evidence-based dietary recommendations from UK public health authorities.

The food pyramid was replaced due to its flaws, including its overemphasis on carbohydrates (without distinguishing between types), its potential for industry influence, and its outdated understanding of fats. Newer models like the Eatwell Guide and MyPlate offer more modern advice.

No, the Eatwell Guide does not recommend a low-carb diet. It allocates a significant portion of the plate to starchy carbohydrates, but specifically highlights higher-fiber, wholegrain options as a priority.

The pyramid's tiered structure can imply a rigid hierarchy of foods, while the Eatwell Guide's plate format is often seen as more intuitive and practical for illustrating meal balance and proportions.

The Eatwell Guide applies to most people over the age of two, including vegetarians and people of various ethnic backgrounds. However, specific dietary needs for children under two or people with medical conditions like diabetes may require professional advice.

They are placed outside the main plate to emphasize that they are not a necessary part of a healthy, balanced diet. The guide recommends consuming these foods infrequently and in small amounts.

The Eatwell Guide includes a clear hydration message, advising 6-8 cups of fluid daily. This was a key omission in the older visual food pyramid models.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.