Understanding the Incidence and Prevalence of Protein S Deficiency
While the search query asks about the incidence of protein S deficiency, most published studies focus on its prevalence, which is the total number of cases at a given time. Incidence, the rate of new cases developing over a period, is more difficult to track. Therefore, discussions of how common protein S deficiency is primarily refer to prevalence rates, which vary considerably depending on the type of deficiency and the population being studied.
Prevalence of Hereditary Protein S Deficiency
The hereditary form of protein S deficiency is caused by mutations in the PROS1 gene and follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. This means that inheriting just one copy of the mutated gene is sufficient to increase the risk of blood clots. The prevalence rates for this form vary based on severity:
- Mild (Heterozygous) Deficiency: This is the most common hereditary form, where an individual inherits one mutated copy of the PROS1 gene. Studies estimate the prevalence in the general population to be between 0.16% and 0.21%. Other estimates suggest it affects approximately 1 in 500 people.
- Severe (Homozygous/Compound Heterozygous) Deficiency: This form occurs when an individual inherits two mutated copies of the gene, one from each parent. It is exceptionally rare, and its exact prevalence is unknown. Newborns with this condition often develop life-threatening purpura fulminans shortly after birth.
Geographical Differences in Prevalence
Research has shown that the prevalence of protein S deficiency differs between ethnic groups. For instance, some studies suggest that protein S deficiency is 5 to 10 times more common in Japanese populations compared to white populations. The estimated prevalence in the general Japanese population is reported to be between 0.48% and 0.63%. This difference may be due to a higher prevalence of specific genetic mutations in certain geographical areas.
Incidence and Prevalence of Acquired Protein S Deficiency
An acquired protein S deficiency is not inherited but develops as a result of an underlying medical condition, medication, or physiological state. Unlike the inherited form, there is no single incidence rate for acquired deficiency; its frequency is dependent on the incidence of the causative condition. Conditions known to cause acquired protein S deficiency include:
- Liver disease: The liver produces protein S, so liver damage can lead to reduced levels.
- Vitamin K deficiency: Protein S is a vitamin K-dependent protein, and a lack of vitamin K can reduce its function.
- Oral contraceptive use and pregnancy: Both increase levels of C4b-binding protein, which binds and inactivates protein S, thus decreasing the amount of free, active protein S.
- Chronic infections and inflammation: Conditions like HIV infection and systemic lupus erythematosus are known to cause a decrease in protein S levels.
- Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC): This condition involves widespread clotting that consumes clotting proteins, including protein S.
Frequency in Patients with Blood Clots
While relatively uncommon in the healthy population, the frequency of protein S deficiency is significantly higher in people who have experienced a blood clot, such as a venous thromboembolism (VTE). In patients diagnosed with VTE, protein S deficiency is found in 1% to 13% of individuals, depending on the study population. This highlights that while many people with a deficiency may never have a thrombotic event, those who do are much more likely to have this underlying clotting disorder.
Diagnostic Challenges and Variable Reporting
One reason for the varied reporting on the prevalence of protein S deficiency is the difficulty in diagnosis. Assay results can be influenced by several factors, including:
- Presence of acute thrombosis
- Pregnancy or use of oral contraceptives
- Concurrent use of oral anticoagulants like warfarin
- Underlying infections or inflammation
Therefore, a person may have a transiently low protein S level that does not reflect a permanent inherited deficiency. A proper diagnosis often requires repeat testing or a complete thrombophilia workup.
Comparison of Inherited vs. Acquired Protein S Deficiency
| Feature | Inherited Protein S Deficiency | Acquired Protein S Deficiency | 
|---|---|---|
| Cause | Genetic mutation in the PROS1 gene, usually inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. | Result of an underlying medical condition, medication, or physiological state. | 
| Onset | Usually present from birth, although symptoms in mild cases may not appear until adulthood. | Can occur at any point in life, as a consequence of another condition. | 
| Severity | Ranges from mild (heterozygous) to extremely rare and severe (homozygous). | Varies with the severity of the underlying condition; can be transient or chronic. | 
| Testing Considerations | Requires careful interpretation of test results, often needing repeat testing after the influencing factor (e.g., acute thrombosis) has resolved. | Protein S levels are tested in the context of the underlying illness, and may normalize with treatment of the primary condition. | 
Conclusion
The incidence and prevalence of protein S deficiency are complex to define due to the distinction between inherited and acquired forms, significant variations across different populations, and diagnostic challenges. For the inherited form, mild (heterozygous) deficiency has a general population prevalence of approximately 1 in 500, making it a notable, though often asymptomatic, risk factor for blood clots in adulthood. In contrast, the severe form is extremely rare. The incidence of acquired deficiency is dependent on the prevalence of its many possible causes, from liver disease and vitamin K deficiency to pregnancy and oral contraceptive use. Regardless of the form, a protein S deficiency significantly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, warranting careful diagnosis and management. A key takeaway is that diagnosing true inherited deficiency requires careful consideration of all potential confounding factors to avoid misinterpretation.
For more detailed medical information, consider consulting authoritative resources like the National Institutes of Health (NIH).