Skip to content

What is the Trader Joe's dark chocolate lawsuit?

3 min read

In December 2022, a Consumer Reports study found that 23 of 28 dark chocolate bars tested contained potentially harmful levels of heavy metals. This triggered multiple class-action complaints against several brands, prompting the question: what is the Trader Joe's dark chocolate lawsuit?

Quick Summary

A lawsuit alleged Trader Joe's concealed the presence of heavy metals, including lead and cadmium, in its dark chocolate after a Consumer Reports study revealed high levels. A federal judge dismissed parts of the case, ruling that this information was publicly available.

Key Points

  • Consumer Reports Findings: A December 2022 Consumer Reports study detected potentially harmful levels of lead and cadmium in several dark chocolate bars, including two popular Trader Joe's varieties.

  • Basis for Lawsuit: Class-action lawsuits were filed against Trader Joe's alleging deceptive marketing for failing to disclose the presence of these toxic heavy metals on product packaging.

  • Judicial Ruling: In 2024 and 2025, federal judges dismissed significant parts of the consolidated class actions, ruling that information about heavy metals in dark chocolate was public knowledge, not exclusively known by Trader Joe's.

  • Source of Contamination: Lead and cadmium can naturally occur in cacao plants through soil absorption and environmental contamination during the drying process.

  • Health Concerns: Long-term exposure to lead and cadmium, even at low levels, can pose serious health risks, especially to children and pregnant women.

  • Industry Impact: The case serves as a precedent for lawsuits concerning naturally occurring contaminants in food and underscores the role of independent testing in consumer awareness.

In This Article

The Consumer Reports Investigation and Its Findings

In late 2022, Consumer Reports tested 28 dark chocolate bars for heavy metals like lead and cadmium. The study found detectable levels in all bars, with 23 exceeding potentially harmful levels for adults consuming one ounce daily. Two Trader Joe's products were highlighted:

  • Trader Joe's Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao: Tested high in lead, surpassing California's limit by 192%.
  • Trader Joe's The Dark Chocolate Lover's Chocolate 85% Cacao: High in both lead and cadmium, exceeding limits by 127% and 229% respectively.

This study led to multiple class-action lawsuits against Trader Joe's and other chocolate companies.

What the Lawsuits Alleged

Class-action complaints against Trader Joe's claimed the company sold products with toxic heavy metals without informing consumers. Key allegations included:

  1. Deceptive Marketing: Plaintiffs argued Trader Joe's marketing was misleading for not disclosing lead and cadmium on packaging, stating they would not have bought the chocolate otherwise.
  2. Negligence: Lawsuits alleged Trader Joe's breached public trust by selling contaminated products and failing to test them adequately, seeking damages for affected consumers.

The Court's Ruling and Rationale

A federal judge in San Diego dismissed several consolidated class-action lawsuits against Trader Joe's in March 2024, followed by a summary judgment in April 2025. The judge's decision rested on:

  • Public Knowledge: Information about heavy metals in chocolate has been widely reported for years, including by groups like As You Sow, negating the claim that Trader Joe's had exclusive knowledge.
  • Reasonably Obtainable Information: The court stated that public reporting meant consumers could have found this information themselves, regardless of individual awareness.
  • Unspecified Risk: For some claims, the judge found plaintiffs didn't prove the heavy metal levels posed an unreasonable risk, as they didn't exceed federal or safety thresholds.
  • State-Specific Claims: Some claims under consumer protection laws in Illinois, New York, and Washington initially survived dismissal motions, showing variations in legal requirements.

Comparison of Arguments in the Lawsuit

Aspect Plaintiffs' Argument Trader Joe's Defense Outcome (Federal)
Knowledge of Heavy Metals Trader Joe's knowingly concealed the presence of lead and cadmium from consumers. The presence of heavy metals was widely known through public reports and studies. Court sided with Trader Joe's; information was not exclusively known by the company.
Deceptive Labeling Marketing and labels were deceptive for omitting health risks. No federal laws require disclosure for naturally occurring heavy metals at these levels. Claims of deceptive marketing failed when exclusive knowledge couldn't be proven.
Product Safety Products were unsafe for human consumption due to toxic metal content. The levels found did not pose an unreasonable safety risk and fell within accepted tolerances. Plaintiffs failed to adequately plead that the products were unfit to eat.

The Source of Heavy Metals in Chocolate

Heavy metals in chocolate often come from natural sources rather than intentional contamination.

  • Cadmium: Absorbed by cacao plants from soil where it naturally occurs.
  • Lead: Can contaminate beans during drying when exposed outdoors to dust and soil, then mix in during processing.

Potential Health Risks of Lead and Cadmium Exposure

Exposure to lead and cadmium, especially long-term, poses health risks.

  • Lead: Can cause nervous system issues and developmental problems in children; hypertension and kidney damage in adults.
  • Cadmium: Linked to kidney, bone, and lung diseases; classified as a carcinogen.

Risks are associated with chronic exposure, not occasional consumption. Health authorities continue to monitor levels.

Implications for Consumers and the Chocolate Industry

The lawsuit's outcome emphasizes consumer vigilance and the importance of independent testing. It also pressures the chocolate industry to address naturally occurring contaminants, with some exploring new processing methods. The lack of federal limits for heavy metals in most foods creates legal ambiguity. This case may set a precedent for future lawsuits regarding natural food contaminants.

Conclusion

The Trader Joe's dark chocolate lawsuit, initiated by a Consumer Reports study revealing elevated heavy metal levels, brought a widespread industry issue to light. While a federal judge dismissed most claims, citing public awareness of heavy metals in chocolate, the case heightened consumer consciousness. It underscores the challenges of regulating natural contaminants and the value of independent testing. Informed consumer choices remain essential. Read more about the original Consumer Reports findings here.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary reason was a Consumer Reports study in late 2022 that found two specific Trader Joe's dark chocolate bars contained elevated levels of lead and cadmium. Lawsuits alleged that Trader Joe's engaged in deceptive marketing by not disclosing this on product labels.

The lawsuits specifically referenced two dark chocolate bars based on the Consumer Reports findings: Trader Joe's Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao and Trader Joe's The Dark Chocolate Lover's Chocolate 85% Cacao.

A federal judge in San Diego largely dismissed the consolidated class-action lawsuits in March 2024 and granted a summary judgment in April 2025 in favor of Trader Joe's. The judge ruled that the presence of heavy metals was public knowledge and that the company did not have exclusive knowledge of the issue.

The Consumer Reports study found detectable levels of both lead and cadmium in all 28 dark chocolate bars it tested, suggesting it is a widespread industry issue.

Cadmium is absorbed from the soil by the cacao plant as it grows, while lead contamination often occurs after harvest, when the cacao beans are dried outdoors and exposed to environmental sources.

Long-term exposure to these heavy metals can pose serious health risks. Lead exposure can cause neurological damage, particularly in children, while chronic cadmium exposure can lead to kidney, lung, and bone disease.

Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not set federal limits for lead and cadmium in most foods, including chocolate.

Yes, following the initial dismissal, plaintiffs had the option to amend their complaints and were also able to proceed with some state-specific claims, and have the right to appeal the final ruling.

Health experts emphasize that the risks are from chronic, long-term exposure, not a single instance of consumption. If concerned, individuals can consult a healthcare provider. The dismissal of the lawsuit means there was no legal determination that the products were unsafe in any specific amount.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.