Skip to content

Which has more calories, haddock or salmon? A Nutritional Deep Dive

4 min read

Based on USDA data, a standard 3.5-ounce (100g) serving of cooked haddock contains approximately 90 calories, while a similar serving of cooked farmed Atlantic salmon contains significantly more, at around 206 calories. Therefore, salmon has considerably more calories than haddock due to its higher fat content.

Quick Summary

Haddock is a lean white fish with fewer calories, while salmon is a fatty fish higher in calories and beneficial omega-3s. Both are excellent sources of high-quality protein.

Key Points

  • Calorie Count: Salmon has more calories than haddock due to its higher fat content, while haddock is the lower-calorie option.

  • Fat Profile: Salmon is rich in healthy omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA), whereas haddock is a lean fish with significantly less fat.

  • Protein Source: Both fish are excellent sources of high-quality protein, but salmon typically contains a slightly higher amount per serving.

  • Vitamin and Mineral Differences: Salmon is generally richer in vitamins B12 and D, while haddock is also a good source of selenium and phosphorus.

  • Dietary Goals: Choose haddock for a low-fat, low-calorie meal, or choose salmon to maximize your intake of beneficial omega-3 fatty acids.

  • Flavor and Texture: Haddock has a milder flavor and firm, flaky texture, making it versatile, while salmon has a richer taste and more delicate texture.

In This Article

A frequent question for those monitoring their diet or simply curious about their food is: which has more calories, haddock or salmon? The answer lies in their fundamental biological differences. Haddock is a lean, white fish, whereas salmon is an oily, fatty fish. This distinction is the key to understanding their varying calorie counts and overall nutritional profiles. While both are healthy protein sources, their fat content creates a substantial difference in caloric density, making one a lighter option and the other a more nutrient-dense choice.

Nutritional Comparison: Haddock vs. Salmon

The most straightforward way to compare haddock and salmon is to look at their nutritional breakdown per a standard serving size, typically 3.5 ounces or 100 grams. This comparison reveals that haddock is the clear winner for those seeking a lower-calorie option, while salmon provides a greater nutritional punch, especially regarding healthy fats.

Here is a side-by-side comparison based on USDA nutritional data:

Nutrient (per 100g, cooked) Haddock Farmed Atlantic Salmon
Calories ~90 kcal ~206 kcal
Total Fat ~0.6 g ~13.4 g
Protein ~20 g ~22 g
Saturated Fat ~0.1 g ~3.1 g
Omega-3s ~0.17 g ~2.6 g

Fat and Omega-3 Fatty Acids

The most significant nutritional difference between haddock and salmon is their fat content. Salmon is a well-known source of beneficial omega-3 fatty acids, specifically EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid). These fats are crucial for brain function, heart health, and reducing inflammation. Because of its higher fat content, salmon is the superior choice for maximizing omega-3 intake.

Haddock, on the other hand, is a much leaner fish. With only a fraction of the fat found in salmon, it is a low-fat dietary choice. While it does contain some omega-3s, the quantity is far less than that of salmon. For individuals on a very low-fat diet, haddock is an ideal option, but those prioritizing the heart and brain health benefits of omega-3s will prefer salmon.

Protein Content and Satiety

Both fish are excellent sources of high-quality protein, which is essential for building muscle, repairing tissue, and promoting satiety. While salmon typically contains a slightly higher protein count per serving, the difference is not as dramatic as the calorie or fat disparity. For instance, a 3-ounce serving of cooked salmon may have around 23 grams of protein, while the same serving of haddock offers about 17 grams. Either fish provides a substantial protein boost to any meal, making both effective for feeling full and satisfied.

Vitamins and Minerals

Beyond macronutrients, the vitamin and mineral profiles of haddock and salmon also differ. Salmon is a much richer source of several key nutrients.

  • Salmon is higher in:
    • Vitamin D: Vital for bone health and immune function.
    • Vitamin B12: Critical for nerve function and red blood cell production.
    • Selenium: A powerful antioxidant.
  • Haddock is rich in:
    • Selenium: Still a good source, though less than salmon.
    • Phosphorus: Important for healthy bones and teeth.
    • Vitamin B12: A good source, supporting metabolic processes.

Flavor Profile and Culinary Uses

Taste and texture are also important factors when choosing between these two fish. Haddock has a very mild, slightly sweet flavor with a firm, flaky, and tender texture, making it incredibly versatile. It is a staple in fish and chips and can be baked, fried, or poached without overpowering other ingredients. Salmon, being an oily fish, has a richer, more distinct flavor and a softer, more delicate texture. Its taste can range from mild to strong depending on whether it is wild-caught or farmed. Salmon is often grilled, baked, or pan-seared and pairs well with stronger flavors like dill or lemon.

Making the Right Choice for Your Diet

When deciding which fish to include in your meal plan, your health goals and preferences should guide your choice. If you are focused on weight management and calorie reduction, haddock is the better option. Its lean profile makes it a low-calorie, high-protein food. If your priority is increasing your intake of healthy omega-3 fatty acids for heart and brain health, salmon is the superior choice due to its higher fat content. As a registered dietitian or nutritionist would likely point out, variety is important, so incorporating both fish into a balanced diet can provide a wide range of essential nutrients.

To explore more about healthy fish choices and diet tips, check out resources like the UnityPoint Health website.

Conclusion

In conclusion, salmon has more calories than haddock, primarily because it is an oily fish with a higher fat content, including abundant omega-3s. Haddock, a leaner white fish, offers fewer calories and less fat. The best choice depends on your specific dietary needs: haddock for a lower-calorie meal, or salmon for a higher intake of healthy omega-3s and other nutrients. Both are highly nutritious and can be valuable components of a healthy diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Salmon has more calories than haddock because it is a fatty, oily fish. The higher fat content, particularly healthy omega-3 fatty acids, results in a higher caloric density compared to the lean, white-fleshed haddock.

For weight loss purposes where lower calorie intake is the main goal, haddock is the better choice. Its lean profile and lower fat content mean fewer calories per serving.

The healthier choice depends on your specific needs. Salmon offers superior omega-3 content and more vitamins like D and B12. Haddock is a very low-fat option. A balanced diet incorporating both can be very beneficial.

While haddock contains some omega-3s, it is not considered a rich source. For high levels of EPA and DHA, fatty fish like salmon, mackerel, and sardines are better options.

The cooking method can add calories. Frying either fish will increase the calorie count due to the added oils. The nutritional difference between the two remains, but baking or steaming is a low-calorie way to prepare both.

Yes, there can be slight variations. Farmed salmon may have a higher fat and calorie content than wild-caught salmon, though both are significantly higher in calories and fat than haddock.

You can, but it will change the flavor and texture. Haddock is much milder and flakier, while salmon is richer and more delicate. It is a good low-fat alternative if the taste difference is acceptable.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.