Skip to content

Which is Healthier: Cod or Pollock? A Nutritional Showdown

5 min read

According to NOAA Fisheries, both cod and pollock are popular wild-caught whitefish options, but many consumers wonder which is healthier. While both are excellent sources of lean protein, key differences in mercury levels, fat content, and omega-3s can significantly influence which fish is the better choice for your diet.

Quick Summary

Both are healthy, lean proteins, but pollock has significantly lower mercury levels, making it ideal for frequent consumption. Cod has a firmer texture, while pollock contains more omega-3s.

Key Points

  • Pollock has lower mercury: Alaska pollock has a very low mercury content compared to cod, making it a safer option for more frequent consumption, especially for children and pregnant women.

  • Pollock offers more omega-3s: Alaska pollock contains a higher amount of beneficial omega-3 fatty acids per serving than cod.

  • Cod is firmer: For dishes like classic fish and chips or stews where the fish needs to hold its shape, cod's firmer texture is preferable.

  • Both are lean protein sources: Both cod and pollock are low in calories and fat while providing high-quality, lean protein.

  • Sustainability depends on origin: When sourced from Alaska, both are considered sustainable, but pollock stocks are generally more abundant.

  • Taste is similar, texture differs: Both have a mild flavor, but pollock's flakes are more delicate compared to cod's robust, firm flakes.

  • Consider your diet: For maximum omega-3s and minimum mercury, pollock is the winner, while cod is a better choice for recipes requiring a firmer fillet.

In This Article

Cod vs. Pollock: A Side-by-Side Nutritional Breakdown

When comparing cod and pollock, it's important to look at their nutritional profiles. Both are lean, high-protein white fish, but there are subtle yet important differences in their micronutrient and omega-3 content. For instance, a 100g serving of Alaska pollock is reported to contain nearly double the omega-3 fatty acids of the same amount of cod.

Comparing Core Nutrients

Feature Cod (per 100g, cooked) Pollock (per 100g, cooked)
Calories ~90 ~90
Protein ~20g ~20g
Omega-3s Moderate amount (e.g., ~150mg) Higher amount (e.g., ~344mg for Alaska pollock)
Vitamin B12 Excellent source Excellent source
Selenium Excellent source Excellent source
Mercury Level Low to moderate (0.111 ppm for Pacific) Very low (0.031 ppm for Alaska)
Fat Content Very low Very low

Key Health Differences and Benefits

Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Both fish contain heart-healthy omega-3s, but Alaska pollock, in particular, has a higher concentration. These fatty acids are crucial for brain health, reducing inflammation, and lowering the risk of heart disease.

Lower Mercury Content: For frequent consumption, especially by sensitive populations like children and pregnant women, pollock has a significant advantage. Alaska pollock has a very low mercury concentration of approximately 0.031 ppm, while Pacific cod is in the low-to-moderate range at around 0.111 ppm. This means pollock can be enjoyed more regularly with less concern about mercury accumulation.

Rich in Micronutrients: Both fish are nutritional powerhouses, delivering essential vitamins and minerals. These include:

  • Vitamin B12, important for nerve function and preventing anemia.
  • Selenium, a powerful antioxidant that supports thyroid function.
  • Phosphorus, which plays a role in bone health and kidney function.

Culinary Considerations: Texture and Flavor

The choice between cod and pollock often comes down to the recipe, as their textures and flavors differ. Both have a mild, white, and flaky flesh, but cod is known for being firmer and holding its shape better during cooking.

Cod is best for:

  • Classic fish and chips, where its firm texture prevents it from falling apart.
  • Hearty stews and seafood bakes.
  • Dishes where the fish needs to maintain its shape, like grilling or searing fillets.

Pollock is excellent for:

  • Fish sandwiches, such as McDonald's Filet-O-Fish.
  • Fish sticks, cakes, and imitation crab meat (surimi).
  • Stir-fries and fish tacos, due to its more delicate, tender flakes.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

For environmentally conscious consumers, sustainability is a key factor. The sustainability status of both cod and pollock depends on where they are harvested.

Sustainable Sourcing

  • Wild Alaska Pollock: Widely regarded as one of the most sustainable fish in the world, with healthy and abundant populations managed by stringent regulations. Fisheries in Alaska are independently certified by organizations like the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).
  • Atlantic Cod: Stocks have faced depletion and are subject to stricter management and rebuilding plans. While some U.S. fisheries are sustainably managed, consumer awareness is needed to ensure a responsible choice.

Making a Sustainable Choice

To make an informed, eco-friendly decision, look for certifications from reputable organizations like the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) or check seafood guides from groups like Seafood Watch. The fishing method also plays a role; for example, Alaska pollock typically uses midwater trawling with minimal impact on habitat, while other fisheries may have different impacts.

Making Your Final Decision

Ultimately, the choice between cod and pollock depends on your priorities. Both are highly nutritious white fish with valuable health benefits, including being excellent sources of lean protein, B vitamins, and minerals. However, key differences in mercury, omega-3s, and texture can help you decide.

If you prioritize minimizing mercury exposure and maximizing omega-3 intake for frequent meals, particularly for children or pregnant women, pollock is the superior choice. It is also often the more affordable and environmentally friendly option, especially when sourced from Alaska.

If you need a firmer fish that holds up to specific cooking methods like frying or stews, cod is a better fit. Its flavor is slightly richer, and while its mercury levels are slightly higher, they are still considered low-to-moderate, making it safe for moderate consumption.

Conclusion: Neither fish is definitively 'better' than the other across all metrics, but pollock offers a compelling advantage with lower mercury content and higher omega-3s. For most people, a balanced diet incorporating both, considering their culinary uses and sustainability credentials, is the best approach. You can learn more about seafood safety guidelines from authoritative sources like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Optional Resources

To explore more about sustainable seafood and mercury guidelines, consider visiting the following resources:

Conclusion: The Final Verdict on Cod vs. Pollock

Both cod and pollock are excellent additions to a healthy diet, providing lean protein and vital nutrients. However, when considering lower mercury levels and higher omega-3 content, pollock edges out cod as a slightly healthier option for frequent consumption. The best choice ultimately comes down to your personal health needs, culinary preference, and sustainability concerns. By making informed decisions about your seafood, you can enjoy delicious, healthy, and responsible meals.


This article provides general information and is not a substitute for medical advice. Consult with a healthcare professional for personalized dietary recommendations.

The Healthy Choice: Cod or Pollock?

When weighing up the health benefits of cod versus pollock, the scales tip towards pollock in a few key areas, particularly for regular consumption. This is largely due to its consistently lower mercury levels and generally higher omega-3 fatty acid content. Cod remains a perfectly healthy option, but requires slightly more mindful consumption due to its low-to-moderate mercury status. Ultimately, diversifying your seafood intake to include both fish can be a delicious way to enjoy their unique culinary properties while reaping their nutritional rewards.

Quick Facts: Which is Healthier Cod or Pollock?

  • Omega-3s: Pollock typically contains more healthy omega-3 fatty acids than cod.
  • Mercury: Alaska pollock has a significantly lower mercury concentration than Pacific cod.
  • Protein: Both are high-quality, lean protein sources.
  • Sustainability: Alaskan pollock fisheries are among the world's most sustainably managed.
  • Texture: Cod has firmer flakes, while pollock is more delicate and tender.
  • Culinary Uses: Cod is great for frying, while pollock is often used in fast-food sandwiches and fish sticks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Both pollock and cod are excellent for weight loss, as they are low in calories and fat while being high in satisfying protein. The best choice depends on your overall meal preparation, as frying either fish will add significant calories.

Alaska pollock typically has a higher omega-3 fatty acid content than cod. Some analyses show Alaska pollock providing twice the amount of omega-3s as cod in a similar serving size.

Yes, pollock, particularly Alaska pollock, is the fish commonly used in fast-food items like McDonald's Filet-O-Fish sandwiches and most fish sticks.

Yes, U.S. wild-caught Alaska pollock is considered a very sustainable seafood choice. Its populations are abundant and well-managed under strict regulations.

Cod is considered low in mercury, making it safe for pregnant women to consume in moderation. The FDA recommends pregnant women consume 8–12 ounces of low-mercury fish per week, and cod falls within this category.

Cod has a firmer texture with larger, more robust flakes. Pollock has a more delicate and tender texture, which can break apart more easily when overcooked.

Cod is generally described as having a slightly richer, more pronounced seafood taste. Pollock has a milder, less 'fishy' flavor profile, which some prefer.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.