Mercury in Fish: Understanding the Basics
Mercury, a naturally occurring element, enters the environment and aquatic food chain through both natural events and human activities like the burning of fossil fuels. In water, microorganisms convert elemental mercury into methylmercury, a potent neurotoxin that accumulates in fish. This process, known as bioaccumulation, means that predatory fish higher up the food chain tend to have higher concentrations of mercury. For this reason, regulatory bodies like the FDA provide guidelines to help consumers make informed choices about seafood consumption.
Salmon vs. Mackerel: A Species-by-Species Breakdown
When comparing salmon and mackerel, it's crucial to specify the species. Not all mackerel are the same, and their mercury levels can vary dramatically based on size and diet. The following breakdown clarifies the distinctions.
- 
Salmon: Salmon is almost universally considered a low-mercury fish. This is because salmon are relatively low on the aquatic food chain and have shorter lifespans compared to larger predatory fish. Both farmed and wild salmon generally contain low levels of mercury. For example, fresh/frozen salmon has an average mercury concentration of just 0.022 ppm, while canned salmon is even lower at 0.014 ppm. This puts salmon firmly in the "Best Choices" category recommended by the FDA. Wild Alaskan salmon, in particular, is noted for its low contaminant levels. 
- 
Mackerel: The mercury content in mackerel is highly dependent on the species. Here are the key differences: - King Mackerel: This large, predatory species is high on the food chain and has a long lifespan. Consequently, it has some of the highest mercury levels among common fish and should be avoided, especially by pregnant women and young children. The FDA classifies King Mackerel in its "Choices to Avoid" category.
- Atlantic/Mediterranean Mackerel: These are smaller, short-lived species that feed lower on the food chain. As a result, their mercury levels are very low and comparable to those of salmon. The FDA lists Atlantic Mackerel as a "Best Choice" for consumption.
- Spanish Mackerel: Falling somewhere in the middle, Spanish mackerel has more mercury than Atlantic mackerel but less than King mackerel. It is classified as a "Good Choice," with a recommended intake of one serving per week.
 
Comparison Table: Salmon vs. Mackerel Mercury and Nutrition
| Feature | Salmon (e.g., Wild Alaskan Sockeye) | Mackerel (e.g., Atlantic) | 
|---|---|---|
| Mercury Level | Low (approx. 0.022 ppm) | Very Low (approx. 0.05 ppm) | 
| Mercury Level (High End) | N/A | High (King mackerel, approx. 0.730 ppm) | 
| Primary Omega-3s | High in DHA and EPA | High in DHA and EPA | 
| Protein Content | Excellent source | Excellent source | 
| Vitamin D | Excellent source | Excellent source | 
| Vitamin B12 | Excellent source | Excellent source | 
| Other Nutrients | Selenium, potassium, astaxanthin | Selenium, iron, copper | 
| FDA Recommended Consumption | Best Choice (2-3 servings per week) | Best Choice (2-3 servings per week for Atlantic) | 
The Mercury Food Chain and Its Impact
The principle behind mercury accumulation, known as biomagnification, is key to understanding the differences between these fish. Larger, longer-lived fish like King mackerel are at the top of their food chain, consuming many smaller fish over their lifetime. Each smaller fish contains a small amount of methylmercury, which becomes concentrated in the larger fish's body over time. This is why apex predators like shark and swordfish are consistently high in mercury. In contrast, salmon and smaller species of mackerel, which eat smaller prey and have shorter lifespans, do not accumulate significant levels of mercury.
Nutritional Comparison Beyond Mercury
While mercury is a key safety consideration, both salmon and mackerel offer significant health benefits. They are both excellent sources of high-quality protein, Vitamin D, and Vitamin B12. However, their most notable shared benefit is their high content of omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA and DHA, which are crucial for heart and brain health. Omega-3s are anti-inflammatory, can help lower blood pressure, and contribute to cognitive function. The concentration of omega-3s can vary depending on whether the salmon is wild or farmed, but both are considered rich sources.
How to Choose the Safest and Healthiest Option
For most consumers, incorporating both salmon and lower-mercury mackerel (such as Atlantic) into their diet can provide a wide range of nutrients without significant mercury concerns. The key is to be mindful of the species of mackerel you are purchasing. When in doubt, Atlantic mackerel is a safe, low-mercury alternative to salmon. For those who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy, sticking to the FDA's "Best Choices" list, which includes all salmon and Atlantic mackerel, is the safest course of action.
Conclusion
In summary, salmon consistently ranks low in mercury, making it a reliable and healthy seafood choice. Mackerel's mercury content is species-dependent; while the smaller Atlantic variety is also low in mercury, the larger King mackerel contains dangerously high levels. Therefore, to answer the question, some mackerel species (King) are indeed higher in mercury than salmon, while others (Atlantic) are comparable. Consumers should always verify the type of mackerel they are buying to ensure they are making the safest, most nutritious choice for themselves and their families. For official government guidelines on seafood consumption and mercury, consult the FDA's detailed advice.