Skip to content

Which type of fish has the most calcium?

3 min read

A 3.75-ounce (92-gram) can of sardines with edible bones contains over 350 mg of calcium, making it one of the richest fish sources available. This remarkable mineral content highlights why canned fish, where the bones are softened and consumed, stands out when considering which type of fish has the most calcium.

Quick Summary

This article explores which fish are highest in calcium, focusing on how preparation affects mineral content. It provides a detailed comparison of canned sardines versus other fish, explains the nutritional benefits of edible bones, and offers tips for increasing dietary calcium intake through seafood.

Key Points

  • Sardines Offer the Most Calcium: Canned sardines with bones are the top fish source of calcium, providing over 350 mg per serving.

  • Canned is Key: The canning process softens fish bones, making them edible and the primary source of calcium.

  • Canned Salmon is a Strong Runner-Up: Canned salmon, also consumed with its edible bones, is another powerful fish-based calcium source.

  • Fresh Fish is Not a High Calcium Source: Fresh fish fillets contain very little calcium because the large, inedible bones are removed before cooking.

  • Bioavailability is High: The calcium from fish bones is readily absorbed by the body, especially when paired with the natural Vitamin D found in oily fish.

  • Versatile and Nutritious: Incorporating canned sardines or salmon with bones into your diet is a simple and effective way to increase your calcium intake and receive other benefits like Omega-3s.

In This Article

Why Canned Sardines are the Calcium King

When searching for the highest calcium content in fish, the deciding factor isn't just the species, but also how it's prepared. For most fish, the majority of calcium is locked away in the large, inedible bones. The canning process, however, softens the smaller, delicate bones of certain fish to the point where they become completely edible and easily digestible. This unique feature transforms small fish like sardines and salmon into powerful dietary calcium sources.

Sardines, in particular, are the clear frontrunner. A 100-gram serving of cooked sardines provides about 382 mg of calcium, meeting nearly 40% of the daily recommended intake for many adults. This is far higher than most other seafood options and even rivals a glass of milk. The inclusion of the bones is crucial; a fresh sardine fillet without bones would offer only a fraction of this mineral.

The Surprising Benefits of Edible Bones

While the concept of eating fish bones might sound unappetizing, the process of canning eliminates any concerns about texture or safety. The bones in canned sardines and salmon are so soft that they are virtually unnoticeable, blending seamlessly into the fish's flaky texture. Beyond just calcium, these bones also provide other important nutrients. Researchers have found that the calcium in fish bones is highly bioavailable, meaning the body can absorb and utilize it efficiently.

  • Maximum Calcium Uptake: Consuming the entire bone structure ensures you get the full nutritional benefit.
  • Synergistic Nutrients: Oily fish like sardines and salmon are also packed with Vitamin D and Omega-3 fatty acids. Vitamin D is essential for the body to absorb calcium properly, making this a perfect nutritional pairing.
  • Lower Mercury Levels: Small fish like sardines and salmon tend to have lower mercury concentrations than larger predatory fish, making them a safer option for frequent consumption.

Canned Sardines vs. Other Fish: A Calcium Comparison

While sardines take the top spot, other canned fish also offer significant amounts of calcium when consumed with their bones. Canned salmon is another excellent choice, providing a substantial calcium boost. Other seafood options, like tuna or fresh fish fillets, offer very little calcium because the bones are typically removed before consumption.

Comparison Table: Calcium in Canned vs. Fresh Fish

Fish Type Serving Size Preparation Estimated Calcium (mg)
Sardines 3 oz Canned with bones 325 mg
Salmon 3 oz Canned with bones 170-210 mg
Salmon 3.5 oz Fresh, cooked 15 mg
Tuna 3.5 oz Canned, oil pack 13 mg

This table clearly illustrates the massive difference that the canning process and bone consumption make. For example, a 3 oz serving of canned salmon provides approximately ten times more calcium than a 3.5 oz serving of fresh, cooked salmon. This is a crucial distinction for anyone relying on fish as a calcium source.

Maximizing Calcium Intake from Seafood

To ensure you are getting the most calcium from your fish, follow these tips:

  1. Choose Canned: Opt for canned sardines or salmon packed in water or oil. Always read the label to ensure they contain bones.
  2. Use the Whole Fish: When making dishes with canned fish, incorporate the entire contents of the can, including the softened bones, into your recipe. They will break down easily into sauces, salads, or fish cakes.
  3. Diversify Your Sources: While fish with bones is an excellent source, don't forget other calcium-rich foods like leafy greens, almonds, and fortified plant-based milk to meet your daily needs.

Conclusion

When the question is which type of fish has the most calcium, the unequivocal answer is canned sardines, followed by canned salmon, due to the presence of edible bones. For individuals who are dairy-free or simply looking to diversify their calcium sources, these small but mighty fish are an excellent dietary addition. By choosing canned fish with bones and incorporating it into a balanced diet, you can significantly boost your calcium intake for stronger bones and overall health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, canned sardines and salmon are high in calcium because their small, soft bones are included in the canning process and become completely edible. This allows you to consume the calcium-rich skeletal structure that would otherwise be discarded.

A single serving of canned sardines can offer as much or more calcium than a glass of milk, making it a comparable and sometimes superior option for those seeking non-dairy calcium sources.

No, canned tuna is not a significant source of calcium because the large bones are removed before canning. Canned tuna typically contains very little calcium compared to canned sardines or salmon with bones.

Yes, studies have shown that calcium from fish bones is well-absorbed. The presence of other nutrients like Vitamin D in oily fish, such as salmon and sardines, further enhances calcium absorption.

It is very difficult to get a significant amount of calcium from fresh fish alone, as you would not consume the bones. Fresh salmon, for instance, has only a fraction of the calcium found in its canned counterpart with bones.

Yes, canned salmon with bones is another excellent choice for calcium. Some other smaller fish that are eaten whole, like anchovies and pilchards, are also good sources of dietary calcium.

You can add mashed sardines to salads, mix them into pasta sauce, or serve them on crackers. Because the bones are soft, they blend in easily and are not noticeable in most dishes.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.