Skip to content

Who is Responsible for Determining the Dietary Reference Intakes?

3 min read

The collaborative development of Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for the United States and Canada began in the early 1990s, replacing previous national standards and fostering a more unified approach to nutrient recommendations. This initiative brought together top scientific minds to create the reference values used today.

Quick Summary

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is primarily responsible for establishing DRIs in North America through its expert committees, with active involvement and collaboration from Health Canada.

Key Points

  • Lead Organization: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, through its Food and Nutrition Board, leads the process for establishing DRIs in North America.

  • Canadian Collaboration: Health Canada is an active partner and co-sponsor in the DRI development process, contributing to a harmonized North American standard.

  • Expert Committees: Expert panels and subcommittees of U.S. and Canadian scientists, vetted for their expertise, conduct the scientific reviews and establish the reference values.

  • Evolution of Standards: The DRI system replaced earlier national recommendations, including the U.S. Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) and the Canadian Recommended Nutrient Intakes (RNIs).

  • Multi-Part Values: DRIs comprise several reference values, including Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), Adequate Intake (AI), and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL).

  • Evidence-Based: The entire process is a rigorous, evidence-based scientific evaluation that reviews current literature to determine nutrient requirements and safety.

In This Article

The North American Authority: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, specifically the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) within its Health and Medicine Division, is the primary body responsible for determining Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) in the United States and Canada. This is a collaborative effort involving expert panels and subcommittees with scientists from both countries. Health Canada is also actively involved and co-sponsors the process, which ensures the recommendations are based on the latest scientific evidence and are applicable across North America. These committees are tasked with reviewing scientific literature to evaluate nutrient needs and potential risks.

A Multi-Stage, Expert-Driven Process

Establishing DRIs is a rigorous, multi-year process led by expert panels assembled by the Food and Nutrition Board. These panels, composed of scientists from various disciplines like nutrition and epidemiology, thoroughly review scientific literature on nutrient requirements and health effects. They then evaluate this evidence to determine appropriate indicators for different life stages and gender groups and derive the specific DRI values. The resulting recommendations undergo independent peer review before publication to ensure scientific objectivity.

The Evolution from RDAs to DRIs

The DRI system represents an advancement from earlier national standards, such as the U.S. Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) and Canada's Recommended Nutrient Intakes (RNIs), both replaced in the mid-1990s. This shift expanded the focus beyond preventing deficiency diseases to include the role of nutrients in chronic disease prevention and the introduction of a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) to address potential risks from excessive intake.

The Various Dietary Reference Intake Values

  • Estimated Average Requirement (EAR): The average daily intake level estimated to meet the needs of half the healthy individuals in a specific group. It is used to assess group intake and forms the basis for the RDA.
  • Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA): The average daily intake level sufficient for nearly all (97–98%) healthy individuals in a given group. This is the target for individual intake.
  • Adequate Intake (AI): Used when an EAR cannot be determined due to insufficient data, the AI is based on observed or experimentally estimated nutrient intake by healthy people.
  • Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL): The maximum daily intake level unlikely to cause adverse health effects for almost all individuals in a population group.

Comparison of Key Institutions in DRI Development

Feature National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Health Canada
Primary Role Oversees and conducts the scientific evaluation process through its Food and Nutrition Board. Actively involved in the collaborative process and co-sponsors the development of DRIs.
Expertise Sourcing Convenes expert volunteer panels of scientists from both the U.S. and Canada. Provides expert scientific input and participates in committee deliberations.
Funding Primarily funded by U.S. federal agencies. Provides sponsorship and funding as a primary partner.
Geographic Scope North American (U.S. and Canada). North American (Canada), harmonized with the U.S..

The Collaborative North American Partnership

The long-standing partnership between the U.S. and Canada in developing DRIs allows for shared resources, avoids duplication, and ensures a consistent scientific basis for dietary guidance across North America. This collaboration is overseen by standing committees that work to keep the framework and process up-to-date. The resulting reports on various nutrients are valuable resources for researchers, policymakers, and health professionals. Additional information about this oversight is available from the National Academies Press.

Conclusion: A Rigorous and Collaborative Effort

The responsibility for determining the Dietary Reference Intakes for North America lies primarily with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, working closely with Health Canada. This structured, multi-stage process relies on expert scientific panels to establish the various DRI values—EAR, RDA, AI, and UL. This collaborative, evidence-based system provides the crucial foundation for dietary recommendations and public health policy in both the United States and Canada.

Frequently Asked Questions

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is the lead organization responsible for determining the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) in North America, with active collaboration from Health Canada.

While sponsored by U.S. federal agencies, the DRIs are set by the independent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, not directly by the government. This ensures scientific rigor and independence from political influence.

Health Canada co-sponsors the development of the DRIs and provides expert scientific input by having Canadian scientists participate on the various expert panels and committees.

If there is insufficient scientific evidence to establish an Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), an Adequate Intake (AI) is provided instead of an RDA. The AI is based on observed or experimental estimates of intake by a healthy population.

The DRI process replaced the older RDA system to reflect a broader understanding of nutrition. It accounts for the role of nutrients in reducing the risk of chronic disease and also includes a Tolerable Upper Intake Level to address potential toxicity.

No, the DRIs are reference values that vary by life stage group and gender. They are intended for healthy people and need to be adapted by qualified professionals for individuals with specific health conditions or needs.

The committees are made up of volunteer expert scientists from the U.S. and Canada. They are vetted based on their expertise in relevant disciplines, including human nutrition, epidemiology, and toxicology.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.