Skip to content

Why are vitamins A and C no longer required on the Nutrition Facts label?

5 min read

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), deficiencies in vitamins A and C have become rare in the American population, prompting a significant update to food labeling rules. This major change, finalized in 2016, means that vitamins A and C are no longer required on the Nutrition Facts label, though manufacturers can still include them voluntarily.

Quick Summary

The FDA removed vitamins A and C from mandatory labeling on the Nutrition Facts panel because national dietary surveys show widespread deficiencies are now rare. The update prioritizes nutrients of greater public health concern, such as Vitamin D and Potassium, which were added to the required list instead. This reflects a shift in Americans' dietary habits and public health priorities.

Key Points

  • Public Health Focus: Vitamins A and C were removed from mandatory labeling because widespread deficiencies are no longer a common public health problem in the U.S..

  • Nutrient Swap: The FDA replaced mandatory vitamins A and C with Vitamin D and Potassium, reflecting a shift in public health priorities to address nutrients that Americans are most often lacking.

  • Added Sugars Callout: The new label explicitly lists 'Added Sugars' to help consumers monitor their intake of sugars added during processing, a leading dietary concern.

  • Improved Design and Clarity: The updated label features a refreshed design with larger, bolder font for calories and serving sizes to improve readability and emphasize key information.

  • Voluntary, Not Forbidden: Manufacturers are still permitted to voluntarily include vitamins A and C on their products' Nutrition Facts labels if they choose to do so.

  • Outdated Data Led to Original Rule: The original 1990 labeling requirements mandated vitamins A and C because deficiencies were more common at the time, indicating how the label must evolve with scientific understanding.

  • Real-World Serving Sizes: The revision also updated serving sizes to better reflect what people actually consume, providing a more realistic nutritional picture.

In This Article

Evolving Public Health Priorities: The Driver for Change

The primary reason that vitamins A and C are no longer required on the Nutrition Facts label stems from evolving public health priorities and better nutritional data. When the original label was mandated by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, deficiencies in these specific vitamins were more prevalent among the U.S. population. The label was designed to help combat widespread issues like scurvy (vitamin C deficiency) and night blindness (vitamin A deficiency) by highlighting these key nutrients.

However, over the decades, dietary habits and food fortification practices improved significantly. By the time the FDA began revising the label in 2014, current data from sources like the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) revealed that deficiencies in vitamins A and C had become relatively uncommon. The FDA concluded that focusing on other nutrients was more beneficial for addressing modern public health issues.

Which Nutrients Replaced Vitamins A and C?

As the FDA determined vitamins A and C were no longer public health priorities for mandatory labeling, they replaced them with nutrients that are of greater concern. This shift allows the Nutrition Facts panel to remain a useful tool for guiding consumer choices toward a healthier diet.

Here are the nutrients that have replaced the former standard:

  • Vitamin D: Added as a required nutrient because many Americans do not get enough of it. Vitamin D is essential for bone health and can help protect against osteoporosis.
  • Potassium: Made mandatory because it is often under-consumed, and a diet rich in potassium is linked to lower blood pressure and reduced risk of chronic disease.
  • Added Sugars: A new line item was added to the label to reflect the latest dietary guidelines and help consumers distinguish between naturally occurring and added sugars. High consumption of added sugars has been linked to an increased risk of obesity and other chronic diseases.

The Updated Information on the Nutrition Facts Label

To make the label more effective and user-friendly, the FDA made several other changes alongside the nutrient swap. These updates were designed to better reflect current scientific consensus and assist consumers in making more informed food choices.

A New Design for Clarity and Emphasis

Beyond the change in listed vitamins, the label underwent a design refresh. Key information, such as calories and serving sizes, is now printed in a larger and bolder font to draw immediate attention. This makes it easier for consumers to quickly spot the most crucial information. Serving sizes were also updated to more accurately reflect the amounts people typically eat or drink, rather than ideal portions. For some packages that could reasonably be consumed in one sitting, a "dual column" label now shows both the per-serving and per-package nutritional information.

Comparison: Old vs. New Nutrition Facts Label

Feature Original Label (pre-2016 rules) Updated Label (post-2016 rules)
Required Vitamins Vitamin A and Vitamin C Vitamin D and Potassium
Other Mandatory Nutrients Calcium and Iron Calcium and Iron (still required)
Voluntary Nutrients Vitamin D, Potassium (optional) Vitamins A, C (optional)
Added Sugars Not separately listed Required to be listed with grams and %DV
Calories from Fat Mandatory line item Removed (type of fat considered more important)
Serving Sizes Based on 1993 consumption habits Updated to reflect current consumption
Daily Value Footnote Less detailed explanation of %DV Updated to better explain the meaning of %DV
Design Smaller font for key information Larger, bolder font for calories and serving size

Impact on Consumers and Manufacturers

The FDA's decision to remove vitamins A and C from mandatory labeling has a twofold impact. For consumers, it makes the label more relevant to modern dietary needs, highlighting nutrients that are truly lacking in the average American diet. This allows the limited space on the label to be used more effectively for critical public health information. However, some argue that removing them might decrease awareness of their importance, though the fortification of many foods has largely addressed this.

For manufacturers, the change represents a significant shift in labeling requirements. While the nutrients are no longer mandatory, manufacturers can choose to list vitamins A and C voluntarily. Some companies may opt to keep them on the label, especially for products naturally rich in these vitamins, to use it as a marketing benefit. The new rules also introduced updated Daily Values (DV) for other nutrients, requiring companies to recalculate their nutritional information.

In conclusion, the decision to remove vitamins A and C from the mandatory list on the Nutrition Facts label was a scientifically-grounded choice by the FDA to modernize food labeling. It reflects the progress made in addressing historical nutrient deficiencies while redirecting attention to more pressing public health concerns like the under-consumption of Vitamin D and potassium, and the overconsumption of added sugars. This ensures the label remains a dynamic and relevant tool for consumer health.

Summary of Key Updates to the Nutrition Facts Label

  • Deficiency Rarity: Vitamins A and C were removed because widespread deficiencies are no longer a major public health issue in the US.
  • Prioritizing Current Deficiencies: The updated label now requires Vitamin D and Potassium, which many Americans currently under-consume.
  • Added Sugars Emphasis: A new line for 'Added Sugars' was included to help combat excessive sugar intake, a significant modern health concern.
  • Improved Clarity: The design was updated with larger, bolder fonts for 'Calories' and 'Serving size' to make information more prominent and easier to read.
  • Realistic Serving Sizes: The definition of a serving size was revised to reflect current consumption patterns more accurately.
  • Voluntary Inclusion: Manufacturers can still choose to list vitamins A and C on the label if they wish, especially if their product is a notable source.

A Concluding Perspective

The evolution of the Nutrition Facts label showcases a dynamic, science-based approach to public health policy. By adapting to current dietary trends and nutritional science, the FDA ensures that the label provides the most relevant and actionable information to consumers. While it may seem like a small detail, the removal of vitamins A and C is part of a larger, ongoing effort to refine the tools we use to navigate our health and nutrition in an ever-changing food landscape. This change helps consumers focus on the most impactful nutritional information for addressing prevalent health concerns today.

For more information on these updates, you can consult the official FDA resource on label changes.

Frequently Asked Questions

The FDA removed vitamins A and C from the mandatory list in 2016 based on modern dietary surveys showing that widespread deficiencies of these vitamins are now rare among the American population.

The new label now requires Vitamin D and Potassium to be listed, as research indicates that many Americans do not get enough of these nutrients.

Yes, while not mandatory, manufacturers can choose to list vitamins A and C on the Nutrition Facts label on a voluntary basis.

The FDA made the changes based on current scientific information and national dietary data, which highlighted nutrients like Vitamin D and Potassium as being of greater public health significance today.

No, it does not. It simply reflects that a majority of the American population now gets sufficient amounts of these vitamins through a combination of diet and food fortification, so highlighting them is no longer the most urgent public health priority for labeling.

The final rules for the updated Nutrition Facts label were published in 2016, with compliance dates beginning in 2020 for larger manufacturers and 2021 for smaller ones.

Another major change was the addition of 'Added Sugars' as a separate line item, a move designed to help consumers manage their intake of sugars added during food processing.

Yes, by the compliance deadlines, all packaged foods and beverages in the US were required to display the new and improved Nutrition Facts label.

No, these specific changes apply to the U.S. market, as governed by the FDA. Other countries have their own, often different, nutrition labeling regulations.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.