Skip to content

Why Did They Change It From a Pyramid to a Plate?

4 min read

In 2011, the USDA replaced the complex MyPyramid with the simpler MyPlate icon. This change marked a major shift in public health messaging, aiming to improve nutritional literacy among Americans. Learn why did they change it from a pyramid to a plate and what motivated the new, user-friendly design.

Quick Summary

The shift from the complicated food pyramid to MyPlate addressed consumer confusion over portion sizes and updated science by using a simpler visual to guide balanced eating.

Key Points

  • Simplicity and Clarity: The primary reason for the change was to replace the confusing, abstract pyramid with a simple, familiar visual of a plate.

  • Visual Portion Control: The MyPlate icon directly illustrates recommended food group proportions on a plate, making portion control much more intuitive for consumers.

  • Updated Dietary Emphasis: The plate reflects current dietary science by visually prioritizing fruits and vegetables, which now take up half the plate.

  • Technological Integration: The MyPlate icon was launched with a robust online platform that offers personalized dietary plans, a feature lacking in earlier, pre-internet guides.

  • Focus on Daily Meals: Unlike the pyramid, which offered daily serving guidelines, the plate provides an easy-to-remember framework for balancing every meal.

In This Article

From Pyramid to MyPlate: An Evolution of Dietary Guidance

For decades, the Food Guide Pyramid, and its subsequent update MyPyramid, served as the primary visual tool for American dietary recommendations. However, in 2011, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) made a significant change, retiring the pyramid in favor of the MyPlate icon. This move was not arbitrary but a strategic decision to address the shortcomings of the previous system and to better communicate modern nutritional science to the public. The core reason for the change was to create a more intuitive, practical, and effective reminder for healthy eating.

The Problem with the Pyramid

The original Food Guide Pyramid, introduced in 1992, was an improvement over prior, less visual guidance, but it suffered from several key flaws. One of the most significant issues was its complexity. It was difficult for many people to accurately interpret the recommended number of servings, especially since a 'serving' size was often different from the portion sizes most people consumed. The wide base of the pyramid, dominated by grains, was also criticized for its overemphasis on carbohydrates without distinguishing between whole grains and refined grains. The pyramid's vertical bands and abstract design in the 2005 MyPyramid version did little to improve clarity, requiring users to visit an associated website for detailed information.

Why the Plate is Better

The MyPlate icon was a radical departure from its predecessors, moving away from a hierarchical, tiered structure to a familiar, everyday object. The simplicity of a plate divided into colored sections is its greatest strength, making it easier for people to understand and apply its principles at a glance.

Key advantages of the MyPlate model include:

  • Visual Portions: The icon's four quadrants clearly illustrate the recommended proportions for a balanced meal, encouraging consumers to fill half their plate with fruits and vegetables. This visual cue is far more effective than trying to calculate abstract serving numbers.
  • Intuitive Design: A plate is a universal symbol of mealtime. This makes the guidance immediately relatable and applicable to the user's daily life without needing a complex explanation.
  • Modern Science: The MyPlate icon reflects current dietary guidelines that emphasize a higher intake of fruits and vegetables. It corrects the pyramid's past overemphasis on grains and provides a clearer recommendation for balanced macronutrient distribution.
  • Emphasis on Quality: While the plate itself is simple, the associated online resources at MyPlate.gov provide more nuanced information, such as recommending whole grains over refined ones and leaning towards low-fat dairy.

MyPyramid vs. MyPlate: A Comparison

Feature MyPyramid (2005) MyPlate (2011)
Icon Abstract, vertical colored stripes Simple, intuitive place setting visual
Emphasis Proportions shown by stripe width; website dependence for details Focuses on balanced meal proportions using familiar plate visual
Portion Guidance Required website visit to personalize and understand portions Directly shows recommended food group proportions on a plate
Grains Recommendation Wide stripe, potentially misinterpreted as endorsing high refined grain intake One quarter of the plate; associated materials stress making half whole grains
Fruit & Veggies Narrower stripes, did not emphasize consumption as strongly Half of the plate, visually highlighting their importance
Physical Activity Included a stick figure climbing steps on the icon No activity visual on the main icon; encouraged as a separate concept

The Move Towards Personalization

Beyond the visual design, the change from the pyramid to the plate was part of a larger strategy to make nutrition guidance more personal and accessible. MyPlate was launched with a robust digital platform, MyPlate.gov, that allows users to create a personalized eating plan based on their age, sex, height, weight, and activity level. This move from a one-size-fits-all approach to a customizable system better reflects modern dietary needs and preferences. It also provides resources that cater to various cultural and dietary requirements, including vegetarian and vegan options, which were not as prominent in previous guides.

The simplicity of the MyPlate icon also serves as an effective, memorable reminder in a fast-paced world. As former First Lady Michelle Obama stated upon its launch, the plate is an image that parents can easily grasp and use with their children, making healthy eating more practical. It’s a tool for starting conversations, not a rigid set of rules.

Conclusion

The transition from the Food Guide Pyramid to MyPlate represents a pivotal shift in how public health communicates nutritional information. Driven by the need for a simpler, more modern, and more effective visual tool, the USDA opted for the familiar plate icon. By directly representing mealtime proportions and emphasizing a balanced plate rich in fruits and vegetables, MyPlate succeeded where its predecessors fell short. It is a powerful, intuitive reminder that encourages mindful eating and healthy choices in a way that is easily understood by everyone. For more personalized guidance, consumers can visit the official MyPlate website at MyPlate.gov.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main criticisms were that it was too complex, its serving recommendations were confusing, and it overemphasized carbohydrates without differentiating between whole and refined grains.

MyPlate was officially introduced by the USDA in June 2011, replacing the former MyPyramid icon.

MyPlate is simpler because it uses a familiar image of a plate divided into sections, which immediately and clearly represents recommended food group proportions for a single meal.

The MyPlate icon features four sections for fruits, vegetables, grains, and protein, along with a separate circle representing dairy.

Yes, the change was based on updated dietary guidelines that placed a stronger emphasis on fruits and vegetables and recommended a balanced intake of all food groups.

MyPyramid was often criticized for its confusing, abstract design of vertical stripes, which required users to go online to a separate website for clear instructions, a step most consumers did not take.

The official USDA MyPlate website, MyPlate.gov, offers resources that can generate personalized eating plans based on individual characteristics like age, sex, and activity level.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.