Skip to content

Why is MSG so stigmatized? Unpacking the 1968 rumor and racial bias

4 min read

In 1968, an anecdotal letter published in a medical journal sparked a widespread myth that MSG was an unhealthy and dangerous food additive, leading to the term “Chinese Restaurant Syndrome”. This incident is the root of the modern question: why is MSG so stigmatized? For over 50 years, the additive has been unfairly vilified based on flawed science and xenophobia.

Quick Summary

The decades-long stigma surrounding MSG stems from an unsubstantiated 1968 letter and was amplified by anti-Asian bias, resulting in a misinformed public panic over a safe food additive.

Key Points

  • Flawed Origins: The MSG stigma began with an anecdotal and discredited 1968 letter in a medical journal, not based on rigorous scientific evidence.

  • Xenophobia's Role: The panic was heavily fueled by anti-Asian bias, with the term "Chinese Restaurant Syndrome" unfairly targeting Chinese cuisine.

  • Debunked Science: Early studies showing harm involved injecting massive, unrealistic doses into lab animals, a method irrelevant to normal human consumption.

  • FDA Confirms Safety: Today, major health organizations like the FDA classify MSG as "Generally Recognized As Safe" (GRAS) when consumed in typical amounts.

  • Natural vs. Added: The body metabolizes the glutamate in MSG identically to the natural glutamate found in foods like tomatoes and cheese.

  • Cultural Shift: Modern chefs and food media are working to reclaim MSG's reputation, dispelling old myths and celebrating its use.

In This Article

The Flawed Origin: The Chinese Restaurant Syndrome

In 1968, an obscure letter was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, where a physician described experiencing symptoms like neck numbness and heart palpitations after eating at Chinese restaurants. The author speculated that the cause might be cooking wine, sodium, or monosodium glutamate (MSG). Despite the author's own uncertainty and the lack of any scientific evidence, the letter gained widespread media attention. This launched a moral panic and birthed the now-discredited term, "Chinese Restaurant Syndrome," which was later revised to "MSG symptom complex" due to its problematic racial overtones. The incident singled out Chinese cuisine, implying it was uniquely suspect and unhealthy, a dangerous notion amplified by prevailing anti-Asian sentiment.

The Role of Bad Science

In the wake of the 1968 letter, scientists rushed to investigate MSG, but the early research was often flawed and exaggerated. One infamous 1969 study involved injecting massive, unrealistic doses of MSG into newborn mice. The researchers reported neurological damage and stunted growth, and the sensational findings were widely reported, fueling consumer fears. However, subsequent, more rigorous research debunked these findings by pointing out the un-contextualized dosing and injection method bore no resemblance to how humans consume MSG. Decades of better-designed studies, including double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, have since failed to consistently trigger adverse reactions in individuals, even those who self-identify as sensitive to MSG.

Scientific Consensus: The Safety of MSG

Today, the scientific community and major health organizations are in broad agreement: MSG is a safe food additive for the general population when consumed in customary amounts.

The Body Doesn't Differentiate

The glutamate in MSG is chemically indistinguishable from the glutamate found naturally in many common foods. The body metabolizes both sources identically.

  • Foods rich in natural glutamate include:
    • Tomatoes
    • Aged cheeses, like Parmesan
    • Mushrooms
    • Meat and poultry
    • Seaweed (kombu)
  • Processed foods with added MSG include:
    • Canned soups and vegetables
    • Snacks, like chips and crackers
    • Deli meats and hot dogs
    • Seasoning blends

Can MSG Reduce Sodium?

Interestingly, MSG contains only about one-third the amount of sodium as table salt. By using MSG in combination with or in place of some salt, home cooks and restaurants can reduce a dish's overall sodium content without sacrificing its savory flavor.

Table: MSG vs. Table Salt

Feature MSG (Monosodium Glutamate) Table Salt (Sodium Chloride)
Primary Function Flavor enhancer (umami) Flavor enhancer (salty)
Sodium Content ~12% sodium by weight ~39% sodium by weight
Usage Added to dishes to boost savory notes Primarily used for saltiness
Body Metabolism Metabolized as glutamate, a natural amino acid Metabolized as sodium and chloride ions
Reputation Historically stigmatized, now gaining acceptance Common household staple, excessive use linked to health issues

The Role of Racism and a Cultural Scapegoat

The persistent fear of MSG was not rooted in medical fact but in prejudice. As renowned chef Anthony Bourdain famously put it, "You know what causes Chinese Restaurant Syndrome? Racism". The anti-MSG panic provided a socially acceptable way to express distrust of Chinese and Asian cultures by characterizing their food as dangerous and unnatural. Americans had been consuming MSG for decades in processed foods like canned soups and TV dinners without concern, yet when associated with Chinese restaurants, it became a supposed threat. This double standard highlights the xenophobia at the heart of the myth, forcing many Chinese restaurants to placate customers with "No MSG" signs to survive.

Reclaiming the Flavor Enhancer

Fortunately, a new generation of chefs, food writers, and informed consumers are pushing back against the stigma. In recent years, public education campaigns by organizations like Ajinomoto, the original MSG manufacturer, have worked to correct historical inaccuracies. Efforts to change institutional records have also been successful; in 2020, Merriam-Webster updated its definition of "Chinese Restaurant Syndrome," acknowledging it as an outdated and offensive term. Culinary figures are openly embracing MSG for its umami-boosting properties, showcasing that it is simply a tool for deliciousness. This cultural shift reflects a growing willingness to embrace diverse cuisines and challenge decades of misinformed assumptions rooted in prejudice, not science.

Conclusion

The enduring stigma surrounding MSG has little to do with science and everything to do with a historical mix of misinformation, poor research, and cultural bias. While MSG was once the victim of a food scare rooted in xenophobia, it has since been vindicated by decades of scientific research. Today, major health organizations confirm its safety, and a new wave of culinary voices is proudly embracing its use as a flavor enhancer. The next time you see "No MSG" on a menu, remember the flawed history behind the label and rest assured that modern science has moved on from this baseless scare.

Learn more about the FDA's position on MSG from their official website.

Frequently Asked Questions

MSG is monosodium glutamate, the sodium salt of glutamic acid, an amino acid found naturally in many foods. It was first isolated from seaweed and is now produced by fermenting starch, sugarcane, or molasses.

No, MSG is not considered a true allergen and is not a toxic substance in normal dietary amounts. Decades of scientific research have not found conclusive evidence of harm for the general population.

It was a term coined after a 1968 letter suggested a link between eating Chinese food and various symptoms. The letter was unscientific, and the term has since been replaced by the more accurate, though still rarely applicable, "MSG symptom complex".

A small subset of people may report short-term, mild symptoms like headaches or flushing after consuming large amounts of MSG, especially on an empty stomach. However, blinded studies have not consistently reproduced these effects, and if a reaction does occur, it's often mild.

MSG contains only about one-third the sodium of table salt, and can be used to help reduce overall sodium intake in food without losing flavor. It enhances umami rather than just providing saltiness.

The phrase "no MSG" is often misleading and was historically used to pander to xenophobic fears. Many foods naturally contain glutamate, and the label often appears on products that contain other sodium-rich ingredients or processed additives.

The key takeaway is that the fear surrounding MSG is a myth born from misinformation and racial prejudice. Current science affirms that it is a safe food additive that can be a useful tool for enhancing flavor.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.