Skip to content

Are Back to Nature Cookies Healthy? A Deep Dive into the Ingredients

5 min read

According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), some Back to Nature cookies have been classified as unhealthy ultra-processed foods, despite their 'naturally good' marketing. So, are Back to Nature cookies healthy alternatives to traditional snacks, or just a more subtly marketed indulgence?

Quick Summary

This article analyzes Back to Nature cookies, examining ingredients like sugar, oils, and processing levels to determine their actual healthfulness. Learn how 'plant-based' and 'natural' can be misleading and how these cookies compare to other options.

Key Points

  • Not a health food: Despite marketing as 'natural', Back to Nature cookies are not a health food and are often classified as ultra-processed due to high sugar, refined ingredients, and calorie content.

  • High in sugar: A single serving of some varieties can contain a large portion of the daily recommended added sugar intake, even though it comes from 'natural' sources like cane sugar and brown rice syrup.

  • Better ingredients, but still refined: While they lack high-fructose corn syrup and hydrogenated oils, they use other refined ingredients and oils like palm and safflower, and still contain significant amounts of added sugar.

  • Considered a treat, not a staple: These cookies should be seen as an occasional indulgence, not a daily snack, due to their nutritional profile and processing level.

  • Homemade is healthier: For a truly healthy cookie, making them at home with whole ingredients offers the most control over nutritional content.

  • Plant-based is not a synonym for healthy: The term 'plant-based' indicates ingredient origin, not overall healthfulness. Processed snacks can be plant-based and still be unhealthy.

In This Article

Unpacking the 'Natural' Label: What's in Back to Nature Cookies?

Back to Nature markets itself as a provider of snacks made with "honest-to-goodness ingredients" and no high-fructose corn syrup, artificial flavors, or hydrogenated oils. This positioning appeals to health-conscious consumers. However, a closer look at the nutritional information and ingredients reveals a more complex picture. Key ingredients often include cane sugar, brown rice syrup, and various oils. While these are plant-based, their inclusion in high quantities can impact overall healthfulness. The presence of added sugars and refined flours, for example, is a significant factor to consider.

The Role of Sugar and Sweeteners

Back to Nature cookies use cane sugar and brown rice syrup as sweeteners. A single serving (2 cookies) of Classic Creme cookies contains 10 grams of total sugars, with 10 grams of added sugars, which is 20% of the recommended daily value. The chocolate chunk variety contains 9 grams of total sugars and 9 grams of added sugars. For context, the American Heart Association recommends limiting added sugar to about 25 grams per day for women and 36 grams for men. A single serving of some Back to Nature cookies can account for a significant portion of this daily limit. The high sugar content, even from 'natural' sources, contributes to high-calorie density and can lead to health issues if consumed in excess.

Analyzing the Fats and Oils

The company proudly states that its cookies contain no hydrogenated oils, which is a definite plus. However, they often use a combination of palm and safflower oils. While these oils are plant-based, they are often highly refined. Some sources indicate that certain refined oils can contain small amounts of unhealthy trans fats due to high-temperature processing. The saturated fat content can also be a concern. For instance, the Golden Creme Sandwich cookies contain 2 grams of saturated fat per serving, and the Double Creme cookies contain 3.5 grams. Excessive saturated fat intake can negatively affect heart health.

The Issue with Processing

The term "natural" doesn't mean unprocessed. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has flagged some Back to Nature cookies as "unhealthy ultra-processed food". Ultra-processed foods are linked to a higher risk of health problems like heart disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. The processing involves multiple steps and ingredients that go beyond what is found in a home kitchen. Even with "cleaner" ingredients, the end product remains an energy-dense, nutrient-poor item intended for indulgence, not a staple of a healthy diet. This moderate to high degree of processing means the cookies, despite their branding, should not be considered a health food.

Comparison Table: Back to Nature vs. Other Cookies

Feature Back to Nature Cookies Conventional Oreos Homemade Oatmeal Cookies
Ingredients Cane sugar, unbleached wheat flour, palm/safflower oil, brown rice syrup, soy lecithin Sugar, enriched flour, palm/canola oil, high fructose corn syrup, artificial flavor Oats, whole wheat flour, brown sugar, butter, eggs
Processing Level Moderate to High, classified as ultra-processed High, often containing numerous synthetic ingredients Low, made with whole, unprocessed ingredients
Added Sugar Relatively high per serving (e.g., 9-10g) Can be higher, depending on the variety Varies greatly based on recipe, often controllable
Fiber Content Low, often 1g or less per serving Very low Can be high, thanks to whole grain oats
Health Perception Marketed as natural and plant-based, creating a 'healthier' illusion Generally perceived as an indulgent treat Perceived as healthier and more wholesome

Making Healthier Choices

Opting for cookies made at home with whole-food ingredients is the most effective way to control sugar, fat, and processing levels. However, for a convenient, store-bought option, considering the nutritional label is paramount. Look for lower sugar content, higher fiber, and shorter ingredient lists. Brands that use whole grains, nuts, and seeds can offer more nutritional value. Back to Nature cookies are an improvement over products with artificial additives and high fructose corn syrup, but they are still treats and should be consumed in moderation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Back to Nature cookies avoid certain artificial ingredients and hydrogenated oils, they are not genuinely healthy foods. Their high sugar and calorie content, along with the moderate to high level of processing, means they are best treated as occasional treats rather than daily snacks. The branding can give a false sense of healthfulness, so it's important for consumers to read the nutritional facts and ingredient lists carefully. For truly healthy snacks, whole foods are always the best option. Back to Nature offers a "better-for-you" alternative to some mainstream cookies, but the term "healthy" remains a stretch.

For more information on decoding food labels and understanding food processing, you can consult reputable sources like the EWG's Food Scores database.

Note: The EWG classifies some Back to Nature cookies as unhealthy ultra-processed foods.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are Back to Nature cookies considered ultra-processed? Some Back to Nature products are classified as ultra-processed by groups like the EWG due to the number of ingredients and steps involved in their manufacturing, even if those ingredients are from plant-based or 'natural' sources. This classification is linked to health risks from over-consumption.

Are Back to Nature cookies vegan? Most Back to Nature cookies are plant-based, meaning they contain no animal products like dairy or eggs. However, the ingredient list should always be checked, as some products, like the Honey Graham Sticks, contain honey, which is not considered vegan by strict definitions.

Do Back to Nature cookies contain high fructose corn syrup? No, the company explicitly states that its products do not contain high fructose corn syrup. They use cane sugar and brown rice syrup as sweeteners instead.

Are Back to Nature cookies low in sugar? No, a single serving of Back to Nature cookies contains a relatively high amount of sugar, with some varieties having 9-10 grams of added sugar. This represents a significant portion of the recommended daily added sugar intake.

Are these cookies better for you than Oreos? While some consumers feel Back to Nature cookies taste higher quality and less artificial than Oreos, they are still considered a treat. They often have slightly less sugar and avoid certain artificial additives, but may still be high in fat and calories.

Can kids eat Back to Nature cookies? Yes, kids can have them as an occasional treat. However, due to the high sugar and processed nature, they should not be a regular part of a child's diet. Healthier snacks for children include fruits, vegetables, and homemade baked goods.

Does "plant-based" mean a snack is healthy? No, "plant-based" simply means the ingredients are derived from plants and do not include animal products. It does not guarantee low sugar, low fat, or minimal processing. Sugar, refined oils, and flours are all plant-based but not necessarily healthy in large quantities.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary drawback is their high sugar content and status as an ultra-processed food, which detracts from their healthfulness despite the use of plant-based and non-GMO ingredients.

No, while a lack of high-fructose corn syrup is a positive, the cookies still contain high amounts of added sugar from other sources like cane sugar and brown rice syrup, which contribute to their high-calorie count and processed nature.

Health risks linked to a diet high in ultra-processed foods include an increased risk of heart disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.

Homemade cookies can be significantly healthier as they allow for control over ingredients, sugar levels, and fat content. Back to Nature cookies, even with 'better' ingredients, are still manufactured treats with moderate to high processing.

The cookies often use a combination of palm and safflower oils. While not hydrogenated, these oils are refined and contribute to the cookies' fat and calorie content.

A food's plant-based status doesn't automatically make it healthy. Many highly processed foods, including snacks with high sugar and refined flour content, are plant-based but lack the nutritional benefits of whole foods.

No, there can be variation. It's always essential to check the specific nutritional information and ingredients list for the particular cookie variety, as sugar and fat content can differ.

No, due to the high sugar and fat content, these cookies are best limited to an occasional treat for children. Whole, unprocessed foods are a better choice for regular snacking.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.