Skip to content

Are Candy Kittens Ultra Processed? A Deeper Look at Your Vegan Sweets

4 min read

According to the widely-used NOVA classification system, ultra-processed foods are typically industrial formulations with five or more ingredients, often including additives. This raises the question: are Candy Kittens ultra processed, despite their 'natural' marketing?

Quick Summary

This article analyzes the ingredients and manufacturing of Candy Kittens, comparing them to the NOVA classification criteria to determine if they are ultra-processed and how they compare to other sweets. It provides insights into food processing levels and offers context for making informed dietary choices.

Key Points

  • YES, Candy Kittens are ultra-processed: Based on the internationally recognized NOVA classification, their industrial formulation with multiple processed ingredients and additives classifies them as ultra-processed.

  • Vegan does not mean minimally processed: The use of plant-based ingredients and natural colors does not prevent a food from being ultra-processed; the key is the degree of industrial manipulation.

  • Ingredient list is key: Ingredients like glucose syrup, modified starch, and isolated proteins are industrial markers of ultra-processed food.

  • High sugar content: Despite marketing, Candy Kittens have a high sugar content, consistent with other conventional sweets.

  • Marketing can be misleading: Branding as 'gourmet' or 'natural' can distract from the fact that the product is a manufactured confection, not a whole food.

  • Consider overall dietary patterns: While an occasional treat, ultra-processed foods, including Candy Kittens, are energy-dense and nutrient-poor, and should be consumed in moderation within a balanced diet.

In This Article

Understanding the ULTRA-Processed Food Classification

To determine if Candy Kittens are ultra-processed, it's essential to understand the NOVA food classification system, which categorizes foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing.

  • Group 1: Unprocessed or minimally processed foods. These are foods in their natural state or with minimal alterations that don't add ingredients like salt or sugar. Examples include fresh fruits, vegetables, and plain yogurt.
  • Group 2: Processed culinary ingredients. These are derived from Group 1 foods but are not typically consumed on their own. They include things like vegetable oils, sugar, and salt, which are used to prepare other dishes.
  • Group 3: Processed foods. These are relatively simple products made by adding Group 2 ingredients to Group 1 foods. Think of salted nuts, canned vegetables, or freshly baked bread.
  • Group 4: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs). This category includes industrial formulations with a long list of ingredients, often including additives, colors, and flavors not commonly used in home cooking. Their primary purpose is convenience, palatability, and a long shelf life. Examples include packaged snacks, sodas, and most mass-produced confectionery.

Deconstructing Candy Kittens Ingredients

Let's take a look at the typical ingredients found in Candy Kittens, using the Wild Strawberry flavor as an example:

  • Sugar: A processed culinary ingredient (NOVA Group 2).
  • Glucose Syrup: A highly processed liquid sweetener derived from corn or wheat starch.
  • Modified Starch: An industrially processed additive used for texture.
  • Strawberry Juice from Concentrate: A processed food ingredient (NOVA Group 3).
  • Dextrose: A simple sugar derived through industrial processing.
  • Acids (Malic Acid, Citric Acid, Lactic Acid): Additives used for flavor and preservation.
  • Potato Protein & Hydrolysed Pea Protein: Industrially extracted and processed proteins used as emulsifiers and texturizers.
  • Natural Flavouring: A highly concentrated and industrial additive used to provide flavor.
  • Fruit and Plant Concentrates (Sweet Potato, Black Carrot): Used for natural coloring.
  • Acidity Regulators (Sodium Malates, Calcium Carbonate): Industrial additives used to control acidity.

As the ingredient list shows, Candy Kittens are composed of multiple industrially processed ingredients, including glucose syrup, modified starch, dextrose, and various additives for flavor and texture. This composition, along with the industrial techniques used to create their texture, firmly places them in the ultra-processed (NOVA Group 4) category.

The Ultra-Processing Paradox: Marketing vs. Reality

Candy Kittens are often marketed as a 'better' or 'gourmet' sweet, highlighting their vegan and natural flavor credentials. While it's true they avoid animal gelatine and artificial colors, this doesn't change their fundamental classification as ultra-processed. The key lies not in the source of the flavors (natural vs. artificial) but in the degree of processing and the industrial nature of the formulation. This distinction is often lost on consumers, who may perceive 'natural' or 'vegan' as inherently healthier.

Comparison Table: Candy Kittens vs. Minimally Processed Sweets

Feature Candy Kittens Simple Fruit Leather (Minimally Processed)
NOVA Classification Ultra-Processed (Group 4) Minimally Processed (Group 1)
Key Ingredients Sugar, glucose syrup, modified starch, dextrose, multiple acids, protein isolates Fruit puree (e.g., apples, berries)
Processing Level Industrial formulation, extraction, and recombination Dehydration or drying of fruit
Sugar Sources Combination of sugar, glucose syrup, and dextrose Natural fruit sugars
Additives Acidity regulators, natural flavors, fruit concentrates for color None
Nutritional Profile High in calories and sugar, low in fiber and nutrients Higher in fiber and vitamins, lower in calories than candy
Manufacturing Goal Convenience, palatability, long shelf life Preservation and natural sweetness

Broader Health Implications

While Candy Kittens' vegan and 'natural' attributes might be seen as a positive step, it's crucial to consider the broader health context of ultra-processed foods. Diets high in UPFs have been linked to health conditions such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. These foods are often hyper-palatable, making it easy to consume large amounts and contribute to excess calorie intake without much nutritional benefit. The high sugar content in Candy Kittens, with some varieties containing over 60g of sugar per 100g, is a significant factor to consider.

The Bottom Line

Despite their appealing branding and marketing as a 'better' sweet, Candy Kittens are definitively an ultra-processed food according to the internationally recognized NOVA classification system. They are industrial formulations designed for palatability and long shelf life, relying on multiple processed ingredients and additives. For consumers seeking to reduce their intake of ultra-processed foods, it's important to look beyond marketing claims and examine the ingredient list. While an occasional treat is fine, they should not be mistaken for a genuinely healthier or minimally processed option. A healthy diet is generally characterized by plenty of whole, unprocessed foods.

Conclusion

The verdict on the question, "Are Candy Kittens ultra processed?" is yes, they are. The reliance on industrially derived sugars (like glucose syrup and dextrose), modified starches, and various protein isolates and additives places them squarely in the ultra-processed category. Consumers who are mindful of ultra-processed food intake should be aware of this and not be swayed solely by marketing that emphasizes vegan credentials or 'natural' flavors. An occasional indulgence is not a concern, but it's important to understand the reality of their composition for those monitoring their consumption of highly processed products.

Are Candy Kittens Ultra Processed: The Final Word

When you see a sweet product, especially one marketed as a high-end or 'better-for-you' vegan option, it's easy to assume it bypasses the industrial processing that defines ultra-processed foods. However, the case of Candy Kittens clearly demonstrates that sophisticated marketing can often obscure the level of processing involved. The takeaway is to always be a label detective and rely on objective classification systems like NOVA, rather than relying solely on front-of-pack claims. Choosing fewer ultra-processed foods, whether vegan or not, can be a beneficial step toward a healthier dietary pattern overall. As with all confectionery, moderation is key.

World Cancer Research Fund: What is ultra-processed food and should we be worried about it?

Frequently Asked Questions

The NOVA system categorizes foods into four groups based on their level of processing: 1) Unprocessed or minimally processed, 2) Processed culinary ingredients, 3) Processed foods, and 4) Ultra-processed foods. It's a key tool for understanding food processing.

No. The presence of natural flavors and colors doesn't change a food's ultra-processed classification. These can be industrially extracted and concentrated, which is a hallmark of ultra-processing.

No. The vegan status of a product, such as Candy Kittens, only means it contains no animal products. Many plant-based products, including meat alternatives and confectionery, are ultra-processed due to industrial formulation and additives.

Most commercially mass-produced sweets and candies, including Candy Kittens, are considered ultra-processed because they are industrial formulations rich in extracted ingredients and additives. However, a sweet made at home with simple ingredients would not be.

Diets high in ultra-processed foods have been linked to negative health outcomes such as obesity, heart disease, and type 2 diabetes. Understanding a food's processing level helps in making informed dietary choices for better health.

Look for a long list of ingredients, especially those not typically used in home cooking, such as glucose syrup, modified starches, hydrolyzed proteins, and various additives and emulsifiers. These are key indicators of ultra-processing.

Yes, in moderation. A healthy dietary pattern focuses mainly on whole or minimally processed foods. While an occasional treat of an ultra-processed product is acceptable, it should not displace more nutritious options.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.