Skip to content

Are Nut Thins healthier than Wheat Thins? A Detailed Nutritional Breakdown

4 min read

According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, many crackers perceived as healthy still contain high levels of sodium or added sugars, making the question 'Are Nut Thins healthier than Wheat Thins?' more complex than it first appears. The answer depends heavily on your specific nutritional priorities.

Quick Summary

This article provides a head-to-head comparison of Nut Thins and Wheat Thins, examining key nutritional differences and overall ingredient quality.

Key Points

  • Lower Sodium: Original Nut Thins contain significantly less sodium (55-115mg) than Original Wheat Thins (200mg).

  • Less Added Sugar: Original Nut Thins have no added sugars, whereas Original Wheat Thins contain 4g of added sugar per serving.

  • Higher Fiber: Original Wheat Thins offer more dietary fiber (3g) from their whole-grain wheat base compared to Nut Thins (1g), which are made from refined rice flour.

  • Gluten-Free Option: Nut Thins are naturally gluten-free due to their rice flour base, while Wheat Thins are not.

  • Highly Processed: Both Nut Thins and Wheat Thins are classified as ultra-processed snacks with various additives, despite their differing primary ingredients.

  • Health depends on priorities: The better choice depends on what's most important for your diet—lower sugar, more fiber, or gluten-free status.

In This Article

A Head-to-Head Nutritional Comparison

When evaluating snacks like Nut Thins and Wheat Thins, it's crucial to look beyond the marketing and examine the nutritional panel and ingredient list. While Nut Thins may have a healthier image due to their almond content and gluten-free status, a deeper dive reveals a nuanced picture. The 'healthier' option depends on what metric you prioritize, be it lower sugar, whole grains, or ingredient simplicity. This comparison focuses on the standard, original varieties of both crackers to provide a clear baseline.

Nutritional Breakdown Per Serving

To get a clear picture, let's compare the key nutritional data for a typical serving of each cracker.

Nutrient Nut Thins (Original) Wheat Thins (Original)
Calories ~130 ~140
Total Fat 2.5g 5g
Saturated Fat 0g 0g
Sodium 55-115mg 200mg
Carbohydrates 24g 22g
Dietary Fiber 1g 3g
Total Sugars 0g 5g (4g added)
Protein 3g 2g

Key Differences and What They Mean

  • Sugar: A major distinction is the sugar content. Original Nut Thins contain 0g of total sugar, while Original Wheat Thins have 5g of total sugar, with 4g being added sugars. This makes Nut Thins the clear winner for those monitoring their sugar intake.
  • Sodium: For standard original varieties, Nut Thins are significantly lower in sodium than Wheat Thins, though low-sodium versions of Wheat Thins also exist.
  • Fiber: Despite being made with whole-grain wheat flour, Original Wheat Thins offer a modest 3g of fiber per serving, a decent amount for a cracker. Nut Thins, based primarily on rice flour, only provide 1g of fiber. Whole grains are a more reliable source of fiber than the refined rice flour used in Nut Thins.
  • Protein: Nut Thins have a slight edge in protein, offering 3g per serving compared to Wheat Thins' 2g, likely due to the inclusion of almonds.
  • Main Ingredient: The fundamental difference lies in the main ingredient. Wheat Thins are made with whole-grain wheat flour, while Nut Thins use rice flour, which is a refined grain. A product made with whole grains is generally considered healthier than one made with refined grains.

A Look at Ingredient Quality and Processing

Beyond the basic nutrition facts, the quality of ingredients and the degree of processing play a large role in a product's overall health profile. Both crackers fall into the category of processed snacks, but there are important distinctions to consider.

Nut Thins

  • Base Ingredient: The base of Nut Thins is rice flour and potato starch, not the almonds themselves. While this makes them gluten-free, rice flour is a refined carbohydrate that lacks the fiber and nutrients of whole grains. The small amount of almonds provides some healthy fats and protein, but their presence shouldn't be mistaken for a truly nutrient-dense snack.
  • Processing: Nut Thins are classified as ultra-processed due to additives and the manipulation of their main ingredients. They often contain 'natural flavors', which are complex mixtures of chemicals.
  • Contaminants: Environmental Working Group (EWG) reports that rice-based ingredients may contain arsenic, a potential concern for those regularly consuming rice products.

Wheat Thins

  • Base Ingredient: Wheat Thins are made with 100% whole grain wheat flour, which is a good source of fiber. This is a definite advantage over Nut Thins' refined rice flour base.
  • Added Sugars: The presence of added sugars like sugar, malt syrup, and refiner's syrup, totaling 4g per serving in the original variety, is a significant drawback. Excess sugar consumption is linked to various health issues.
  • Preservatives: Original Wheat Thins have been known to contain preservatives like BHT, which is linked to health concerns.
  • Processing: They are also a moderately processed food, containing multiple ingredients and additives, similar to Nut Thins in this respect.

Conclusion: Which is the Healthier Cracker?

Determining whether Nut Thins are healthier than Wheat Thins is not a simple yes-or-no question. The answer depends on individual dietary needs and priorities.

  • For lower sugar and gluten-free diets: Nut Thins (Original) are the superior choice, with zero sugar and a gluten-free composition.
  • For whole grains and higher fiber: Wheat Thins offer a clear advantage by using 100% whole-grain flour, which provides more dietary fiber than Nut Thins.
  • For overall ingredient quality: Both crackers are highly processed and contain refined components and additives. Health-conscious consumers may want to seek out less-processed alternatives made with whole seeds or nuts as the primary ingredient.

Ultimately, neither snack is a nutritional powerhouse, but they can be part of a balanced diet when consumed in moderation. When choosing, consider what is most important for your health goals. Read the labels carefully, and when possible, opt for crackers with shorter, simpler ingredient lists and no added sugar. The Center for Science in the Public Interest provides valuable insights on how to choose better cracker options, recommending to watch the sugar and prioritize whole ingredients, a useful guide for any shopper.

To make the best choice for you, consider these points:

  • If avoiding added sugar is your top priority, choose Nut Thins (Original) over Wheat Thins (Original).
  • If you follow a gluten-free diet, Nut Thins are the correct option.
  • If you want more fiber, Wheat Thins offer a whole-grain base, providing more fiber than Nut Thins' refined rice flour.
  • To minimize highly processed ingredients, consider exploring other, less-processed cracker brands.

The Final Word

Both crackers are satisfying, crunchy snacks, but their healthfulness is limited by their processed nature. For a truly healthy snack, pairing either cracker with nutrient-rich toppings like hummus, cheese, or avocado can help create a more balanced and fulfilling eating experience.


For more information on selecting healthier crackers and other snacks, consult resources like the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). You can read their guide on spotting the best crackers in the aisle here: How to spot the best in the cracker aisle.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, Nut Thins are made primarily from rice flour and potato starch, not almonds. The almonds are included but are not the main ingredient, meaning the nutritional benefits from the nuts themselves are minimal.

Original Nut Thins are the better choice for a low-sugar diet, as they contain 0g of total sugars. Original Wheat Thins contain 5g of total sugar, with 4g being added sugars.

Original Wheat Thins have more fiber (3g per serving) compared to Original Nut Thins (1g per serving), primarily because they are made with 100% whole-grain wheat flour.

Yes, Blue Diamond Nut Thins are made with a rice flour and almond flour base, which makes them gluten-free and suitable for those avoiding gluten.

Some health experts consider Wheat Thins less healthy due to the inclusion of added sugars and preservatives like BHT in certain versions. The high sodium content in some varieties is also a concern.

Yes, both crackers are categorized as highly or ultra-processed. Nut Thins contain additives and use refined flours, while Wheat Thins also contain added sugars, oils, and sometimes preservatives.

To create a healthier snack, pair either cracker with nutritious toppings that add protein, fiber, and healthy fats. Good options include hummus, avocado, nut butter, or low-fat cheese.

The 'Hint of Salt' version of Wheat Thins offers a lower sodium option (55mg vs 200mg for original) but may still contain added sugars, so it is a relative improvement rather than a purely healthy choice.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.