Skip to content

Can diabetics have rice syrup? The high-GI truth explained

4 min read

Despite being marketed by some as a natural and healthy alternative to sugar, rice syrup is known to have an extremely high glycemic index (GI) of 98, comparable to pure glucose. For individuals with a diabetic condition asking, "can diabetics have rice syrup?" it is crucial to understand its significant and rapid impact on blood sugar.

Quick Summary

Rice syrup's high glycemic index of 98 causes a rapid and sharp rise in blood sugar, making it an unsuitable choice for diabetics. Safer, low-GI sweetener alternatives exist for blood sugar control.

Key Points

  • High Glycemic Index: Rice syrup has an extremely high GI of 98, which is even higher than table sugar and causes rapid blood sugar spikes.

  • Unsuitable for Diabetics: Due to its high GI, rice syrup is a poor choice for people with diabetes or insulin resistance who need to manage their blood glucose levels carefully.

  • Maltose and Glucose Content: The syrup is primarily composed of maltose and glucose from broken-down rice starch, contributing to its high glycemic load.

  • Arsenic Risk: Rice products, including rice syrup, can potentially contain inorganic arsenic, raising health concerns that should not be overlooked.

  • Healthier Alternatives: Safer alternatives with a low or zero GI for diabetics include stevia, monk fruit, erythritol, and allulose.

  • Moderation is Key: Even with healthier alternatives, experts recommend limiting added sweeteners and focusing on whole foods for better blood sugar management.

In This Article

What is rice syrup and its glycemic impact?

Rice syrup, also known as brown rice syrup, is a sweetener derived from rice, often brown rice. It's produced by treating cooked rice with enzymes that break down the starches into sugars, primarily maltose and glucose. While it contains no fructose, its high content of maltose and glucose gives it a particularly high glycemic index (GI).

For diabetics, the glycemic index is a critical measure that indicates how quickly a food will raise blood glucose levels. Pure glucose has a GI of 100, and rice syrup is very close behind with a GI of 98. This is significantly higher than table sugar (sucrose), which has a GI of around 65. Many people mistakenly believe that because it's derived from rice, a staple grain, it's a better choice than refined sugar. However, its composition of fast-acting carbohydrates means it can cause an even more rapid and dramatic spike in blood sugar than other common sweeteners.

The risks for diabetic individuals

Consuming rice syrup can pose several risks for individuals with diabetes or insulin resistance. The primary concern is the rapid increase in blood sugar levels after consumption due to its high GI. For a person with diabetes, managing blood glucose is key to preventing complications, and high-GI foods make this control difficult.

In addition to the glycemic impact, there is a potential risk associated with arsenic contamination. Rice and rice products, including rice syrup, can absorb inorganic arsenic from the soil, a known carcinogen. Concerns have been raised by consumer reports regarding the levels of arsenic in some rice-based products, suggesting that moderation is key for all individuals, not just those with diabetes. While some brands may claim to test for low arsenic levels, it remains a factor to consider.

Furthermore, the perception of rice syrup as a healthier, "natural" option can be misleading. A milder sweetness compared to table sugar can cause people to use larger quantities to achieve the same flavor intensity, unknowingly consuming more sugar and calories.

A comparison of sweeteners

Feature Rice Syrup Table Sugar (Sucrose) Stevia Monk Fruit
Glycemic Index (GI) ~98 (High) ~65 (Moderate) 0 (Zero) 0 (Zero)
Fructose Content 0% ~50% 0% 0%
Calorie Content High High Zero Zero
Natural/Artificial Natural Natural Natural (from plant) Natural (from fruit)

Safer sweetener alternatives for diabetics

Given the risks associated with rice syrup, several safer and healthier alternatives are available for those with diabetes. These options provide sweetness with a minimal or zero impact on blood sugar levels.

  • Stevia: A natural, calorie-free sweetener derived from the stevia plant. It has a GI of zero and is significantly sweeter than sugar, so only a small amount is needed.
  • Monk Fruit: Another natural, zero-calorie, zero-GI sweetener extracted from monk fruit. It does not affect blood sugar and is an increasingly popular choice.
  • Allulose: A naturally occurring "rare sugar" found in small amounts in some fruits. It has very few calories and a GI of 1, meaning it has a negligible effect on blood sugar.
  • Erythritol: A sugar alcohol found in fruits and vegetables. It has minimal calories and does not affect blood glucose levels, but large amounts may cause digestive issues in some individuals.
  • Whole Fruit and Date Paste: Using mashed bananas, date paste, or unsweetened applesauce in recipes can provide sweetness along with fiber, which helps regulate blood sugar absorption.

How to choose the best sweetener for your diet

Selecting the right sweetener is a personal choice that should be guided by your health goals and taste preferences. When making your decision, consider the following factors:

  • Glycemic Response: Prioritize sweeteners with a low or zero GI to minimize the impact on your blood sugar levels. Options like stevia, monk fruit, and allulose are excellent choices.
  • Intended Use: For baking, sweeteners that are heat-stable and provide the necessary texture are important. Allulose and sucralose are often good for baking, whereas stevia and monk fruit are better for drinks or recipes where texture isn't dependent on sugar.
  • Taste Profile: Some zero-calorie sweeteners have a distinct aftertaste that some people dislike. Experiment with small amounts to find a sweetener you enjoy.
  • Consult a Professional: Always discuss your sweetener choices with a healthcare professional or a registered dietitian, especially if you have pre-existing health conditions. They can provide personalized recommendations based on your individual needs.

Conclusion: The verdict on rice syrup

In conclusion, despite some marketing efforts, rice syrup is not a suitable sweetener for most diabetics due to its extremely high glycemic index. The rapid rise in blood sugar it causes can be detrimental to proper glucose management. Instead, individuals with diabetes should opt for safer, low-GI alternatives such as stevia, monk fruit, or allulose. By making informed choices and consulting healthcare professionals, people can effectively manage their blood sugar while still enjoying a touch of sweetness in their diet. The American Diabetes Association provides useful resources for managing blood sugar.

Frequently Asked Questions

Rice syrup has an extremely high glycemic index (GI) of 98, meaning it causes a rapid and sharp increase in blood sugar levels, which is unsafe for individuals with diabetes.

No, brown rice syrup has a higher GI (98) than regular table sugar (sucrose, GI 65) and can cause a more rapid blood sugar spike, making it a worse choice for blood sugar management.

When a diabetic consumes rice syrup, the maltose and glucose are rapidly absorbed, leading to a significant spike in blood glucose and insulin levels.

Yes, there are concerns about potential inorganic arsenic contamination in some rice-based products, including rice syrup, which can absorb the element from the soil.

Safe sweetener alternatives include natural zero-GI options like stevia and monk fruit, as well as low-calorie options like allulose and erythritol.

While it is naturally derived from rice, its "natural" label is misleading for diabetics. The high concentration of simple sugars (maltose and glucose) during processing makes it behave like a high-GI sweetener, regardless of its origin.

Rice syrup (GI ~98) has a much higher glycemic index than honey (GI ~60) and maple syrup (GI ~54), meaning it will cause a faster rise in blood sugar than both of these.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.