Skip to content

Do Coca-Cola and Pepsi have nanoparticles?: The definitive guide for your nutrition diet

4 min read

A 2017 study published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology isolated and identified fluorescent carbon-based nanoparticles in both Coca-Cola and Pepsi, prompting consumer questions about ingredient safety. Addressing whether Do Coca-Cola and Pepsi have nanoparticles? requires understanding the different types of these ultra-small particles and current food regulations.

Quick Summary

This article explores the presence and types of nanoparticles potentially found in cola, distinguishing between naturally-occurring, processed-induced, and engineered nanomaterials. It reviews key studies, discusses the use of additives like titanium dioxide and silicon dioxide in the food industry, and examines the regulatory landscape concerning the safety of such particles in our diet.

Key Points

  • Processed-Induced Nanoparticles: A 2017 study identified fluorescent carbon-based nanoparticles in Coca-Cola and Pepsi, likely formed during thermal processing.

  • Engineered Nanoparticles are Different: These particles are not intentionally added engineered nanomaterials, which are used for specific functions in other foods.

  • Titanium Dioxide (E171) is Not a Cola Ingredient: While commonly used in other products for whitening (e.g., cloudy lemonade), major brands like Coca-Cola and Pepsi do not use E171 in their standard bottled or canned colas.

  • Regulations Vary by Region: The EU banned titanium dioxide (E171) in 2022 over safety concerns, contrasting with the US FDA's 'Generally Recognized As Safe' (GRAS) classification.

  • Health Impact Requires Further Study: Research on the potential long-term effects of consuming nanoparticles is ongoing, with some studies highlighting concerns about bioaccumulation and oxidative stress.

  • Label Reading is Key for Awareness: Consumers should read labels carefully, as additives like titanium dioxide (E171) or silicon dioxide (E551) can sometimes exist in nano-form in other packaged or powdered foods.

  • Ingredient Clarity Varies: Outside the EU, labeling requirements for engineered nanomaterials are often vague, making it difficult for consumers to know if a product contains them.

In This Article

The World of Nanoparticles in Food and Drink

Nanotechnology, the manipulation of matter on an atomic and molecular scale, is increasingly integrated into the food industry, from packaging to product formulation. Not all nanoparticles are intentionally added; they can be categorized into three main types:

  • Naturally occurring: Nanostructures that are naturally present in food. Examples include casein micelles in milk or protein and carbohydrate structures that naturally assemble at the nanoscale.
  • Processed-induced: Nanoparticles that form as a byproduct of food processing methods, like heating or grinding. The fluorescent nanoparticles found in Coke and Pepsi fall into this category.
  • Engineered/Manufactured: Nanomaterials intentionally produced and added for specific functions, such as enhancing color, texture, or flavor.

The 2017 Study on Fluorescent Nanoparticles in Cola

The direct question of "Do Coca-Cola and Pepsi have nanoparticles?" was addressed by a study published in 2017. Researchers isolated fluorescent nanoparticles (NPs) from commercial cans of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi by using column chromatography and characterized them with Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

Key Findings of the Study:

  • The NPs found in both beverages were identified as fluorescent carbon dots (CDs), which are carbon-based nanomaterials.
  • The average size of the isolated NPs was approximately 5 nm, much smaller than nanoparticles commonly found in other processed foods.
  • The study concluded that these carbon dots were likely formed during the thermal manufacturing process, rather than being intentionally engineered additives.
  • While initial testing on mice showed no acute toxicity, the study observed that the ultra-small NPs could cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the liver, brain, and heart, though they were eventually cleared from the body. This highlights the need for more research into potential long-term effects.

Engineered Nanoparticles vs. Colas

In contrast to the processed-induced nanoparticles discovered in the 2017 study, engineered nanomaterials are deliberately used in many other food products. It's important to distinguish these from the carbon dots found in colas, and to examine whether any engineered nanoparticles might be relevant to the cola brands.

Two common engineered nanoparticles used in the food industry are:

  • Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) / E171: This additive is used as a whitening and opacifying agent in many foods, including confectionery, sauces, chewing gums, and some cloudy lemonades. However, major cola brands like Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the US and UK do not openly claim to use E171 in their standard bottled or canned formulas. The European Union banned TiO2 as a food additive in 2022 due to potential health concerns, including possible DNA damage.
  • Silicon Dioxide (SiO2) / E551: Used as an anti-caking agent in powdered foods like salt, spices, and powdered drink mixes. While not an ingredient in standard bottled cola, it could be present in powdered mixes used for fountain drinks.

The Regulatory Landscape and Consumer Concerns

Regulation of nanotechnology in food varies significantly by region. In the European Union, there is heightened scrutiny, and specific engineered nanomaterials require clear labeling. In contrast, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently classifies many of these ingredients, including nano-sized versions, under a "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) status, though experts continue to call for more research.

This discrepancy creates a patchwork of regulation and consumer awareness. The long-term health effects of chronic, low-dose ingestion of nanoparticles are still largely unknown, especially concerning engineered nanomaterials. Studies suggest that nanoparticles, due to their small size, can cross biological barriers and may cause oxidative stress and inflammation. However, the effects depend on numerous factors, including size, shape, surface chemistry, and dosage.

Comparison Table: Colas and Nanoparticle Additives

Feature Coca-Cola (Typical US/UK Formula) Pepsi (Typical US/UK Formula) Engineered Additives (In other products)
Core Ingredients Carbonated water, high fructose corn syrup, caramel color, phosphoric acid, natural flavors, caffeine Carbonated water, high fructose corn syrup, caramel color, sugar, phosphoric acid, caffeine, citric acid, natural flavors N/A
Engineered Nanoparticles None explicitly listed or intentionally added None explicitly listed or intentionally added Titanium Dioxide (E171): Whitening agent

Silicon Dioxide (E551): Anti-caking agent Silver (E174): Antimicrobial agent (rare) | | Processed-Induced Nanoparticles | Fluorescent carbon-based nanoparticles identified in a 2017 study | Fluorescent carbon-based nanoparticles identified in a 2017 study | N/A | | Regulatory Status (US) | Ingredients listed are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) | Ingredients listed are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) | E171 and E551 are permitted as food additives | | Regulatory Status (EU) | Compliant; E171 banned, but wasn't in formulation anyway | Compliant; E171 banned, but wasn't in formulation anyway | E171: Banned as a food additive since 2022 |

Conclusion

While the presence of nanoparticles in both Coca-Cola and Pepsi has been scientifically documented, it is crucial to understand their origin. The particles found were fluorescent carbon dots, likely formed incidentally during manufacturing processes, not intentionally engineered additives like those found in other food products. Major cola brands do not explicitly add engineered nanomaterials to their canned or bottled products in regions like the US and UK.

However, this does not negate the broader conversation about nanoparticles in our food supply. Additives like titanium dioxide (E171), used in many other products, demonstrate that nanomaterials are present in various foods. Differing regulations between regions, such as the EU's ban on E171 versus its continued use in the US, highlight the ongoing scientific debate about long-term health implications. Consumers can best manage their nutrition diet by being mindful of ingredient labels and focusing on whole, unprocessed foods, reducing their intake of complex processed products that are more likely to contain various additives, some of which may exist at the nanoscale.

To learn more about nanotechnology in the food industry, consult the research available from institutions like the National Institutes of Health.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the nanoparticles discovered in a 2017 study were fluorescent carbon dots, which researchers believe formed as an unintentional byproduct of the thermal manufacturing process, not as a deliberate ingredient.

The nanoparticles were identified as fluorescent carbon-based dots, with an average size of about 5 nanometers. Their presence was confirmed using advanced techniques like Transmission Electron Microscopy.

No, standard Coca-Cola and Pepsi colas do not contain titanium dioxide (E171). This additive is used in other food products, like some chewing gums, candies, and cloudy beverages, but it is not a component of major cola brands.

Regulatory approaches vary significantly. The EU has stricter rules, banning certain additives like titanium dioxide (E171) in food and requiring engineered nanomaterials to be clearly labeled. The US FDA, by contrast, relies on a 'Generally Recognized As Safe' (GRAS) status for many substances, including those that might exist in nano-form.

Long-term health effects of consuming nanoparticles are still being researched. Concerns include potential bioaccumulation in organs like the liver and brain, oxidative stress, inflammation, and potential DNA damage, but the effects depend heavily on the nanoparticle's specific properties and dose.

Identifying nanoparticles can be challenging as labeling is inconsistent. Look for additives known to sometimes contain nano-forms, such as titanium dioxide (E171) and silicon dioxide (E551). In the EU, new regulations require clear labeling of engineered nanomaterials.

The 2017 study on the carbon dots in cola was not a definitive safety assessment. While showing uptake into animal cells, further research is needed to determine any potential long-term biological effects of these processed-induced nanoparticles in humans.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.