Skip to content

Do Fish Bones Have Mercury? Understanding How Mercury Accumulates in Fish

4 min read

While nearly all seafood contains trace amounts of mercury, the question of whether do fish bones have mercury is often misunderstood. In fact, studies show that mercury primarily accumulates in fish muscle tissue, with significantly lower levels found in the bones, making them a lesser concern for contamination.

Quick Summary

Mercury is found throughout a fish's body, including the bones, but the highest concentrations are typically bound to proteins in the muscle tissue. A fish's mercury level is primarily determined by its species, age, and diet.

Key Points

  • Methylmercury binding: The toxic form of mercury, methylmercury, binds primarily to proteins in fish muscle tissue, not the mineral structure of bones.

  • Lower levels in bones: Studies have shown that mercury accumulation is highest in fish muscle, with bones containing significantly lower concentrations.

  • High-mercury species: The main health risk comes from consuming the flesh of large, predatory fish high on the food chain, such as shark and swordfish, not from eating bones.

  • Edible canned fish bones are safe: The soft, edible bones in canned fish like sardines are safe and nutritious, offering a good source of calcium without high mercury levels.

  • Bioaccumulation risk: A fish's age, size, and trophic level are the most important factors determining its mercury content due to bioaccumulation and biomagnification.

  • Informed choices are key: Making informed decisions about which fish to eat, especially for vulnerable populations, is more important than avoiding bones.

In This Article

The Chemical Pathway of Methylmercury in Aquatic Ecosystems

To understand mercury levels in fish bones, one must first understand how mercury enters and moves through the aquatic food chain. The process begins with elemental mercury, which is released into the environment from natural sources like volcanoes and rocks, as well as human activities such as burning coal. Once in the water, bacteria and other microorganisms convert this elemental mercury into a far more toxic organic form: methylmercury.

This methylmercury is then absorbed by plankton, which are consumed by small fish. The process of bioaccumulation then occurs, where the concentration of methylmercury builds up in an organism over its lifetime. Subsequently, as larger, predatory fish eat these smaller, contaminated fish, the mercury levels are magnified with each step up the food chain—a phenomenon known as biomagnification. This is why apex predators like shark and swordfish have significantly higher mercury concentrations than smaller fish like sardines.

Where is Methylmercury Stored in Fish?

Unlike other contaminants that might settle in fatty tissues, methylmercury has a strong affinity for binding to proteins. These proteins are abundant in the muscle tissue, or flesh, of the fish. Consequently, studies have shown that the highest concentrations of methylmercury are consistently found in the muscle rather than in the bones or other organs. An NIH study on freshwater fish found mercury concentrations in the following order, from highest to lowest: muscle > eye > bone. While fish bones do contain trace amounts, the risk from consuming them is minor compared to eating the high-mercury flesh of a large predatory fish.

Are Canned Fish Bones a Health Concern?

For many smaller species of fish, like sardines and pink salmon, the bones are often left in during the canning process. This is done for a very good reason: health benefits. The canning process softens the bones, making them perfectly safe and edible. For hesitant consumers, it's important to remember two key facts:

  • Low Trophic Level: Smaller fish like sardines are lower on the food chain, meaning they have not accumulated significant levels of mercury through biomagnification. They are naturally low in mercury.
  • High Nutritional Value: The edible bones in canned sardines and salmon are an excellent, natural source of calcium and other trace minerals. For example, a can of sardines can provide a significant portion of your daily calcium needs.

Therefore, concerns about mercury in the bones of canned fish are largely unfounded, and eating them can actually be quite nutritious.

Mercury in Fish: Bones vs. Flesh

Feature Mercury in Fish Bones Mercury in Fish Flesh (Muscle)
Primary Form of Mercury Trace amounts of various forms Predominantly methylmercury
Concentration Significantly lower Highest in the fish's body
Nutritional Benefit Good source of calcium, phosphorus, trace minerals (in soft bones) Rich in protein, omega-3 fatty acids, iodine, etc.
Safety for Consumption Generally safe, especially when softened during canning Varies by species; consumption guidelines recommended for high-mercury fish
Primary Health Concern Very low concern regarding mercury levels Main source of mercury exposure from seafood, especially for at-risk groups

Factors Influencing Mercury Levels in Fish

It is the whole fish, not just the bones, that is the focus of mercury advisories. Here are the main factors that determine a fish's mercury content:

  • Species: Larger, long-lived predatory fish (e.g., shark, swordfish, king mackerel) have the highest concentrations. Smaller, shorter-lived species (e.g., sardines, salmon, cod) have the lowest.
  • Age and Size: Because mercury accumulates over a fish's lifetime, older and larger individuals of a species will have higher mercury levels than younger, smaller ones.
  • Trophic Level: A fish's position on the food chain is critical. As mercury biomagnifies, top-level predators accumulate the highest concentrations.
  • Habitat Contamination: While global contamination is widespread, fish living near industrial sources of pollution may have higher levels.

Understanding the True Risk and Making Informed Choices

For the average person, the benefits of eating fish—a rich source of omega-3 fatty acids and high-quality protein—far outweigh the risks of mercury exposure, provided that safe consumption guidelines are followed. However, certain populations are more vulnerable, including pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children, due to the potential neurotoxic effects of methylmercury on development. For these individuals, health organizations like the FDA and EPA offer specific advice on limiting high-mercury fish while continuing to eat low-mercury options.

In short, the fear surrounding fish bones and mercury is misplaced. The real issue lies in the muscle tissue of large, predatory fish. For nutrient-dense, lower-mercury options, consider incorporating canned salmon or sardines with bones into your diet to gain the added benefits of calcium. The key to mitigating risk is informed choice regarding the species of fish consumed, not avoidance of the bones themselves.


This article is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult with a healthcare professional regarding any health concerns or dietary decisions. For the latest consumption advice, visit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Conclusion

Ultimately, fish bones do have trace amounts of mercury, but the amount is significantly lower than that found in the muscle tissue. The primary health concern regarding mercury in fish is related to the consumption of high-mercury species that are large, predatory, and long-lived. The edible bones found in low-mercury fish like sardines are safe and can even provide a nutritional boost of calcium. By understanding the process of mercury bioaccumulation and being selective about the type of fish consumed, individuals can enjoy the numerous health benefits of seafood with minimal risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, fish bones contain trace amounts of mercury. However, compared to the muscle tissue, the concentration in bones is significantly lower and poses less of a health concern.

Mercury, specifically the toxic methylmercury, primarily accumulates in the muscle tissue (flesh) of fish because it binds strongly to proteins, which are abundant in muscle.

Yes, the soft bones in canned fish like sardines and salmon are safe to eat. These species are low on the food chain, meaning they have naturally low mercury levels, and the bones are an excellent source of calcium.

Larger, longer-lived predatory fish at the top of the food chain, such as swordfish, shark, king mackerel, and some types of tuna, have the highest mercury concentrations.

No, cooking does not significantly reduce the amount of mercury in fish. The methylmercury is bound to the protein in the muscle tissue and is not affected by heat.

Pregnant women and children should be mindful of mercury, but the concern is focused on limiting high-mercury species of fish in general, not specifically the bones. Limiting fish like swordfish is more important than worrying about bones in low-mercury fish.

Swallowing a fish bone is a physical hazard, not a mercury risk. Small, soft bones usually pass through the digestive system harmlessly, but larger or sharp bones can cause injury.

A fish's mercury level is primarily determined by its species, age, size, and trophic level (its position in the food chain). Larger, older, predatory fish have higher levels due to bioaccumulation and biomagnification.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.