Skip to content

Do Humans Get More Energy From Plants or Animals?

6 min read

While plants are the ultimate source of energy in most food webs, a common misconception is that this means a plant-based diet automatically yields more energy for humans. A comprehensive answer to whether humans get more energy from plants or animals requires examining the differences in nutrient bioavailability, metabolic efficiency, and overall diet composition.

Quick Summary

Animal products typically have higher nutrient bioavailability, but plants offer sustained energy and unique micronutrients. The actual energy gained depends on digestibility, diet complexity, and individual metabolism, revealing a nuanced answer to which food source provides more energy.

Key Points

  • Bioavailability and Digestibility are Key: Animal proteins are generally more bioavailable and digestible than plant proteins, offering a faster amino acid absorption.

  • Plants Offer Sustained Energy: Dietary fiber from plants slows digestion and absorption of sugars, leading to more gradual and sustained energy release.

  • Different Nutrients Excel in Each: Animal products are rich in bioavailable B12, heme iron, and complete proteins, while plants provide fiber, antioxidants, and Vitamin C.

  • Long-Term Health Matters: Plant-based diets are linked to a lower risk of chronic diseases, which influences sustained energy and vitality over the long run.

  • The Whole Diet is Crucial: Overall health and energy are best supported by a balanced diet that includes a variety of nutrient-dense foods from both plants and animals.

  • Ecological vs. Individual Energy: While eating lower on the food chain (plants) is more energy-efficient for the planet, an individual's energy gain is determined by personal digestion and nutrient absorption.

In This Article

The Ecological vs. Physiological Perspective

When we consider the question of energy from plants or animals, it's crucial to distinguish between two different contexts: the ecological food chain and the individual human body's metabolism. In an ecological context, energy is lost at each trophic level, meaning plants contain the most energy because they produce it directly from sunlight. The cow that eats the grass retains only a fraction of that energy, and the human that eats the cow retains an even smaller fraction. From a sustainability standpoint, eating plants is far more energy-efficient for the planet.

However, this ecological principle does not directly translate to what happens inside the human digestive tract. The amount of usable energy a human gets from food is determined by bioavailability and digestibility, and this is where the comparison becomes more complex. Your body doesn't absorb every single calorie from the food you eat; instead, it expends energy to digest and process food, known as the thermic effect of food (TEF). The type of food—plant or animal—significantly influences this process.

Bioavailability and Digestibility

Bioavailability refers to the proportion of a nutrient that is absorbed from the diet and used by the body. Animal proteins and nutrients are often more bioavailable than their plant-based counterparts. This is partly because plants contain natural compounds called anti-nutrients (such as phytates and oxalates) and are encased in fibrous cell walls, which can inhibit the absorption of certain minerals and proteins. Cooking and processing methods can help reduce these effects in plants, but the difference in overall digestibility remains. For instance, animal proteins have a higher digestibility (90–95%) compared to plant proteins (75–80%).

Macronutrients: A Closer Look at Energy Yield

The energy we get from food comes from macronutrients: carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. Both plants and animals provide these, but in different forms and with different energetic impacts.

Proteins: Animal vs. Plant

Animal proteins, such as those from meat, eggs, and dairy, contain all nine essential amino acids and are considered "complete" proteins. They are also more digestible and absorbed faster than most plant proteins. A recent clinical trial found that a meal with animal protein resulted in a significantly higher short-term resting energy expenditure (REE) and TEF compared to a plant-based protein meal. This suggests that the body works harder to process animal protein initially, leading to a faster, more substantial energy spike.

Conversely, most plant proteins are "incomplete," meaning they lack one or more essential amino acids, although exceptions like soy and quinoa exist. By eating a variety of plant proteins, it's possible to get a complete amino acid profile. While the immediate energy burn (TEF) might be lower, plant proteins are also absorbed more slowly, potentially offering a more gradual and sustained release of energy.

Carbohydrates and Fiber

Carbohydrates are the body's primary energy source. While animals store limited amounts of carbohydrates as glycogen in muscle and liver, plants are rich in carbohydrates, including starches and sugars. Plant-based foods are also the exclusive source of dietary fiber, a non-digestible carbohydrate. Fiber plays a critical role in slowing the digestion and absorption of sugars, leading to a more gradual rise in blood glucose and sustained energy levels. This can help avoid the energy spikes and crashes often associated with high-sugar animal products or processed foods.

Here are some key benefits of fiber:

  • Promotes digestive health and regularity.
  • Supports a healthy gut microbiome, which produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that the body can use for energy.
  • Increases feelings of fullness, aiding in weight management.

Fats and Caloric Density

Both plants and animals provide dietary fats, but their compositions differ. Animal fats are primarily saturated, while plant fats tend to be higher in unsaturated fats, which are considered heart-healthy. From an energy density perspective, fat is the most calorie-dense macronutrient, providing 9 kcal/g compared to 4 kcal/g for carbs and protein. Fatty animal products like red meat or high-fat dairy are very calorie-dense. However, many plant-based sources like avocados, nuts, and seeds also offer high energy density but with a different nutritional profile, including fiber and beneficial fats.

The Broader Health and Energy Picture

Focusing solely on raw energy overlooks the other nutritional factors that influence our overall well-being and perceived energy levels.

Micronutrient Differences

Animal products are a more reliable source of certain nutrients essential for energy metabolism and overall health, including:

  • Vitamin B12: Found almost exclusively in animal products; deficiency can cause fatigue.
  • Heme Iron: More easily absorbed than the non-heme iron found in plants.
  • Vitamin D and Vitamin K2: More bioavailable forms found in animal sources.

However, plant-based diets excel in providing other essential micronutrients and compounds:

  • Vitamin C and A: Abundant in fruits and vegetables.
  • Antioxidants and Phytonutrients: Help combat inflammation and oxidative stress, which can deplete energy.

Long-Term Health Outcomes

The composition of a diet has long-term implications for health and, by extension, sustained energy. Plant-based diets are linked to a lower risk of chronic diseases like heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers. These outcomes are influenced by factors such as lower saturated fat and higher fiber intake. On the other hand, excessive consumption of processed red meat and high-fat animal products is associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease and other metabolic disorders. These chronic health issues can profoundly impact energy levels and overall vitality over time.

Comparison: Energy from Plants vs. Animals

Feature Plant-Based Foods Animal-Based Foods
Energy Source Carbohydrates (sugars, starches) provide readily available fuel, while fiber offers sustained energy via gut fermentation. Protein and fat provide energy; protein metabolism can result in a higher short-term energy burn.
Bioavailability Lower for many nutrients due to fiber and anti-nutrients. Digestion can be slower. Generally higher bioavailability for protein, iron (heme), and certain vitamins like B12.
Digestibility Varies, with overall digestibility of plant proteins lower than animal proteins. High digestibility, particularly for muscle proteins.
Nutrient Density Rich in fiber, antioxidants, and specific vitamins/minerals like Vitamin C. Excellent sources of complete proteins, Vitamin B12, and heme iron.
Satiety Fiber content promotes prolonged feelings of fullness. High protein content is very satiating, but fiber-less animal products may not offer the same sustained fullness.

Conclusion: The Holistic View

Ultimately, the question of whether humans get more energy from plants or animals does not have a simple, definitive answer. The 'best' source of energy depends on a combination of factors, including digestibility, bioavailability, and overall dietary composition. While animal products may offer a quicker, more bioavailable protein and energy source, plant-based foods provide a more sustained energy release, along with critical fiber and a wider range of health-promoting compounds. For optimal, long-term health and sustained energy, a balanced diet incorporating a variety of nutrient-dense foods from both plants and animals is most beneficial. A balanced diet provides a spectrum of nutrients that work synergistically to support human energy metabolism efficiently, without the drawbacks of a heavily skewed dietary pattern.

Final Thoughts on Your Diet

When planning your meals, consider the protein package as a whole, as a Harvard study suggests. Focus on getting a diverse mix of both plant and animal foods to ensure you are consuming a wide range of vitamins, minerals, and other beneficial compounds. For instance, combining legumes with rice can create a complete protein meal, and incorporating lean meats or fish provides highly bioavailable nutrients. Remember that the long-term energy and vitality you experience are the result of a holistic dietary approach, not just a single ingredient. It's about how all the components work together to fuel your body effectively. To learn more about the benefits of fiber, visit the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health website.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any significant changes to your diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Animal protein, due to its higher bioavailability and a more significant thermic effect of food (TEF), can lead to a more immediate, higher energy expenditure compared to plant protein meals.

Yes, animal proteins are generally more easily absorbed due to their complete amino acid profile and the lack of anti-nutrients found in many plants, which can inhibit digestion.

Fiber from plants slows down the digestive process, which regulates blood sugar and prevents the energy spikes and crashes associated with rapid sugar absorption. This results in more stable, sustained energy.

While it was once thought necessary to combine different plant proteins at every meal, the amino acid mix of a varied, whole-food plant-based diet is usually sufficient over the course of a day.

Animal products are a more reliable source of Vitamin B12, heme iron, and certain forms of Vitamin D and K2, which are crucial for energy metabolism and overall health.

Yes, a heavily skewed diet can lead to deficiencies (e.g., B12 on a strict vegan diet) or increase the risk of chronic disease (e.g., excessive red meat consumption), both of which impact long-term energy and health.

The body expends energy to digest, absorb, and process food, a process known as the thermic effect of food (TEF). Different macronutrients and food sources require varying amounts of energy to process.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.