Skip to content

Do sardines or salmon have more mercury? A Guide to Making a Safe Choice

3 min read

According to data from the FDA, sardines generally contain less mercury than salmon, with both falling into the 'low-mercury' category. This common knowledge often sparks the question: do sardines or salmon have more mercury, and which is the safer choice for regular consumption?

Quick Summary

Sardines and salmon are both healthy, low-mercury fish options. Sardines contain slightly less mercury due to their smaller size and lower position on the food chain, making them an excellent choice for frequent consumption.

Key Points

  • Sardines contain less mercury: Due to their small size and position on the food chain, sardines consistently have lower mercury levels than salmon.

  • Both are low-mercury 'Best Choices': The FDA and EPA classify both sardines and salmon as low-mercury fish, making both safe for regular consumption.

  • Mercury accumulates via biomagnification: Larger, older predatory fish like swordfish or shark have the highest mercury levels, while smaller fish like sardines and salmon have the lowest.

  • Consider the 'canned' factor: Canned salmon often contains slightly less mercury than fresh/frozen salmon because it's sourced from smaller fish.

  • Health benefits outweigh low risks: For most people, the nutritional benefits of consuming omega-3-rich fish like sardines and salmon far outweigh the minimal risks from their low mercury content.

  • Sensitive groups should prioritize low-mercury: Pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children should prioritize eating low-mercury fish like sardines and salmon for the highest level of safety.

In This Article

How Mercury Accumulates in Fish

Mercury is a naturally occurring element in the Earth's crust, but human activities such as burning fossil fuels release significant amounts into the environment. In aquatic ecosystems, bacteria convert this element into a highly toxic organic form called methylmercury. Methylmercury is readily absorbed by microscopic organisms like plankton, which are then consumed by smaller fish. Through a process known as biomagnification, the concentration of methylmercury increases with each step up the food chain. Larger, older predatory fish accumulate higher levels than smaller, shorter-lived species. This fundamental process explains the mercury levels found in the seafood we consume, which is why the size and diet of a fish are the most critical factors in determining its mercury content.

Size and Life Span Matter

Sardines, which are small, plankton-eating fish with a short lifespan, naturally have very little opportunity to accumulate significant amounts of mercury. Salmon, being a larger, predatory fish with a longer lifespan, will accumulate more methylmercury over time, though still at levels considered very low and safe for most people. The differences between species, even within salmon (e.g., farmed vs. wild-caught), can slightly alter these levels, but the general rule of thumb holds: smaller fish equals less mercury.

Sardines vs. Salmon: A Direct Comparison

Let's break down the mercury content based on data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regularly monitors commercial seafood for contaminants. These figures show the average mercury concentration in parts per million (ppm).

Seafood Type Average Mercury (ppm) FDA/EPA Category Rationale
Sardine ~0.013 Best Choice Small size, low on the food chain
Salmon (Canned) ~0.014 Best Choice Smaller, younger salmon, and processing can affect levels
Salmon (Fresh/Frozen) ~0.022 Best Choice Larger size and longer lifespan than sardines
Tuna (Canned Light) ~0.13 Best Choice Typically smaller skipjack tuna
Tuna (Canned Albacore) ~0.35 Good Choice Larger, predatory tuna species
Swordfish ~1.00 Avoid Large, long-lived predator at the top of the food chain

Canned vs. Fresh/Frozen Considerations

When comparing sardines and salmon, it's also worth noting the differences between fresh and canned varieties. According to FDA data, canned salmon tends to have a slightly lower mercury level than fresh or frozen salmon. This is often because canned salmon uses smaller, younger fish. Both are still firmly within the FDA's 'Best Choice' category, suitable for regular consumption.

Making the Best Seafood Choices

Choosing fish low in mercury is essential for minimizing exposure, especially for pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children. The FDA and EPA provide clear guidelines to help consumers make informed decisions.

Low Mercury Fish (Best Choices):

  • Sardines
  • Salmon (Wild or Farm-Raised)
  • Anchovies
  • Atlantic Mackerel
  • Tilapia
  • Cod
  • Catfish
  • Shellfish (shrimp, scallops, oysters)

Higher Mercury Fish (Choices to Avoid or Limit):

  • Shark
  • Swordfish
  • King Mackerel
  • Bigeye Tuna
  • Marlin
  • Orange Roughy

The Verdict: Both are Excellent, but Sardines Have an Edge

When it comes to the question, "Do sardines or salmon have more mercury?", the answer is that salmon has slightly more, though both are considered very low-mercury fish. The difference is negligible for the average consumer, and both fish offer outstanding nutritional benefits, including essential omega-3 fatty acids vital for heart and brain health. For those looking to minimize mercury exposure as much as possible—particularly pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children—sardines offer a slight advantage. Given that the FDA recommends 2-3 servings a week of low-mercury fish, incorporating a variety of options from the 'Best Choice' list is a sound strategy for a healthy diet.

Ultimately, the choice between sardines and salmon often comes down to personal preference for taste and texture. Both provide a nutritious, low-mercury way to enjoy the health benefits of seafood. For specific and detailed advice on fish consumption, you can refer to the FDA and EPA's recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, it is safe and recommended for pregnant women to eat 2 to 3 servings per week of low-mercury fish like sardines and salmon. The omega-3s are beneficial for the baby's brain and eye development.

Smaller fish like sardines are lower on the food chain and have shorter lifespans. This means they eat less mercury-contaminated food and have less time to accumulate the contaminant in their bodies through biomagnification.

No, according to FDA data, canned salmon typically contains a slightly lower average mercury concentration than fresh/frozen salmon, as canneries often use smaller fish.

Both sardines and salmon are categorized as 'Best Choices' by the FDA, meaning most people can safely eat 2 to 3 servings per week. Pregnant women, nursing mothers, and children can also enjoy these fish regularly.

Yes, health authorities advise avoiding or severely limiting consumption of fish species with very high mercury levels. These include shark, swordfish, king mackerel, bigeye tuna, and tilefish from the Gulf of Mexico.

Research suggests that mercury levels can differ, but both wild-caught and farm-raised salmon are still considered low-mercury fish and are safe for consumption.

While mercury is the main concern, some reports have noted other contaminants like arsenic in certain canned sardines. However, both fish are generally considered safe and healthy, and the benefits of omega-3s are well-established.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.