Skip to content

Does Bark Have Nutritional Value? Unpacking the Truth About a Survival Food

5 min read

For centuries, indigenous communities, particularly in northern climates, have turned to the inner bark of certain trees as a critical source of sustenance during times of scarcity. This historical reliance begs the question: Does bark have nutritional value? The answer lies in distinguishing between the tree's layers and species.

Quick Summary

The inner bark of specific trees contains digestible starches, sugars, minerals, and vitamins, while the outer bark is largely indigestible to humans. Human consumption requires identifying edible species and proper preparation, unlike animals with specialized digestive systems.

Key Points

  • Nutritional Potential: The inner bark, or cambium, contains digestible starches, sugars, minerals, and vitamins, while the tough outer bark is mostly indigestible to humans.

  • Survival Food: Indigenous groups in northern regions historically used the inner bark of certain trees as a last-resort food source during periods of scarcity.

  • Source of Micronutrients: Studies have found that the inner bark of species like Scots pine is rich in essential minerals such as calcium and potassium, and some barks contain vitamin C.

  • Medicinal Properties: Beyond basic nutrition, many barks contain bioactive compounds like phenolics and tannins, which offer potential medicinal benefits, though risks exist with unrefined preparations.

  • Species Identification is Critical: The edibility of bark is entirely species-specific, and consuming the bark of a toxic tree, such as yew or oak, can be dangerous.

  • Human Digestibility Limitations: Unlike animals adapted to eating fibrous plants, humans lack the enzymes to digest cellulose and lignin, meaning most of a tree's bark passes through the digestive system as indigestible fiber.

  • Proper Preparation: Preparing edible bark involves removing the outer layer and cooking the inner bark through boiling, frying, or grinding it into flour.

In This Article

The Anatomy of a Tree's Bark: Inner vs. Outer

The term 'bark' encompasses a complex structure, and for nutritional purposes, it is crucial to differentiate between its layers. The rough, scaly outer bark is primarily dead tissue, or rhytidome, that serves as a protective barrier against pests, weather, and physical damage. The inner bark, known as the phloem and the cambium, is the living tissue directly beneath this tough exterior. This is the layer that carries and stores the tree's nutrients, making it the only part of the bark with any significant nutritional potential.

The Inner Bark: A Reservoir of Stored Energy

Within the cambium layer, trees store energy and vital compounds for growth, especially after winter dormancy. Indigenous peoples in Scandinavia and North America traditionally harvested this layer in the spring, when sap and starch levels were highest. Studies on pine inner bark confirm it contains energy-rich substances like soluble sugars and starches. It is also a source of essential minerals, including significant amounts of calcium and potassium. Some research also indicates the presence of vitamins, including vitamin C.

The Outer Bark: Indigestible Protection

In contrast to the inner bark, the thick outer layer is of no nutritional value to humans. It is predominantly composed of cellulose and lignin, complex plant compounds that the human digestive system cannot break down. While this indigestible fiber can provide roughage to aid digestion, it does not offer caloric energy or absorbable nutrients. The high tannin content in some outer barks can also be bitter and cause digestive upset if consumed in large quantities.

Nutritional Breakdown: What's Actually in Edible Bark?

While not a complete food source, the inner bark of certain trees offers a surprising profile of nutrients that have sustained people in the past. It's not just a filler food; it can contribute meaningfully to a diet, especially when other resources are scarce.

Macronutrients and Micronutrients

  • Carbohydrates: The inner bark of many pine species and poplars, for instance, contains digestible starches and sugars. When dried and ground, this can be used as a flour substitute.
  • Minerals: A study on Scots pine inner bark found it to be rich in minerals like calcium and potassium, which are vital for bone health and nerve function. Other barks, like that of Ficus racemosa, have shown high levels of minerals such as iron and magnesium.
  • Vitamins: Pine inner bark and needles are known to contain high levels of vitamin C, which can be crucial for preventing scurvy in survival situations.

Bioactive Compounds and Medicinal Properties

Beyond basic nutrition, many barks contain bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential.

  • Phenolics and Tannins: These compounds, often antioxidants, are abundant in bark and have anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties. Oak bark is particularly rich in tannins and has historically been used for its astringent properties.
  • Alkaloids: Some tree barks contain potent alkaloids. The cinchona tree, for example, produces quinine, a powerful antimalarial compound. Willow bark contains salicin, which acts as a natural pain reliever.

Edible vs. Toxic Bark: A Crucial Distinction

Proper tree identification is paramount. Consuming the bark of a toxic species can be fatal.

Safe to Consume (Inner Bark Only)

  • Pine (Pinus spp.): A genus widely used as a survival food. The inner bark of most North American species is edible.
  • Birch (Betula spp.): The inner bark is a documented edible resource.
  • Willow (Salix spp.): The inner bark can be eaten and also contains salicin.
  • Poplar (Populus spp.): The inner bark is sweet and starchy.

Toxic and Dangerous

  • Yew (Taxus spp.): Contains highly toxic taxine alkaloids throughout the plant.
  • Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia): The bark and other parts are toxic.
  • Oak (Quercus spp.): While extracts have medicinal uses, ingesting large amounts of the bark can be unsafe and cause kidney or liver problems.

The Human Challenge: Digesting Tree Bark

While some nutrients are present, humans cannot effectively digest the bulk of a tree's bark due to our anatomy. The primary structural components, cellulose and lignin, are undigestible to us, although they serve as dietary fiber. This is in stark contrast to many animals with specialized digestive systems. Consuming significant amounts can lead to severe digestive issues, including cramping and constipation.

Human vs. Animal Digestion: A Key Difference

Animals like beavers, deer, rabbits, and porcupines are adapted to consume and digest tree bark efficiently. They possess specialized digestive systems containing the necessary symbiotic microorganisms to break down cellulose and hemicellulose. Beavers and porcupines have powerful jaws and long intestines to grind and process the fibrous material, while ruminants like deer repeatedly chew their cud to maximize digestion. Humans lack these adaptations, limiting the nutritional benefit we can gain from this fibrous resource. As a result, for humans, bark has always been a food of last resort, not a dietary staple.

A Comparison of Bark Layers

Feature Outer Bark (Rhytidome) Inner Bark (Cambium/Phloem)
Nutritional Value Low to none for humans. Contains starches, sugars, minerals, and vitamins.
Composition Primarily dead cells, high in indigestible cellulose and lignin. Living tissue, transports and stores nutrients.
Texture Tough, thick, and often scaly. Soft, moist, and pliable.
Digestibility Indigestible to humans; serves as fiber/roughage. Can be consumed and digested by humans with proper preparation.
Harvest Method Removed to expose the inner bark. Peeled or scraped from the woody trunk.
Health Risks Generally high in indigestible fiber and some compounds that can cause stomach upset. Risks from improper identification of tree species.

Conclusion: The Final Verdict on Bark Nutrition

While the concept of eating bark might seem extreme, the inner layer of certain trees does hold genuine nutritional value, including carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins. Historically, this has been a crucial, though unpalatable, resource for survival. However, for the average person, it is neither a practical nor recommended dietary component due to its low digestibility, bitter taste, and the significant risk of misidentifying and consuming toxic species. Unless you possess expert foraging skills and face a life-or-death situation, leave the bark to the beavers. For those interested in the potential benefits of tree compounds, bark extracts from known medicinal plants are a safer, more concentrated alternative. A wealth of knowledge on plant identification and survival foraging is available through the USDA Forest Service, a vital resource for anyone considering wild edible plants.

What are some examples of edible bark?

  • Pine (Pinus spp.): The inner bark is a well-documented survival food.
  • Birch (Betula spp.): Inner bark is edible and can be ground into flour.
  • Willow (Salix spp.): Inner bark is edible and contains salicin.
  • Maple (Acer spp.): Inner bark is also edible.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, humans can eat the inner bark (cambium layer) of certain tree species, as it contains some starches, sugars, and minerals. However, it is not a practical or palatable food source and is typically only considered in survival situations.

The inner bark is the living tissue beneath the outer layer, responsible for transporting and storing nutrients. The outer bark is dead, protective tissue, primarily composed of indigestible cellulose and lignin.

No, many tree species have toxic bark, and proper identification is crucial. Edible bark is highly species-specific, and consuming the wrong kind can lead to serious health problems or be fatal.

Humans cannot effectively digest cellulose and lignin because our digestive systems lack the necessary enzymes. While this contributes dietary fiber, it prevents us from extracting significant caloric energy from the bulk of the bark.

Yes, various tree barks are used medicinally, often in extract form, due to potent bioactive compounds like tannins, alkaloids, and phenolics. Examples include pine bark extract for antioxidants and willow bark for pain relief.

Edible inner bark is prepared by first removing the tough outer bark. The softer inner layer can then be boiled, fried, or dried and ground into a flour substitute.

Animals like deer, beavers, rabbits, and porcupines regularly consume tree bark, especially in winter when other food is scarce. They have symbiotic microorganisms in their gut that enable them to digest the fibrous material.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.