Skip to content

Does Tuna Have More Protein Than Steak? A Nutritional Comparison

4 min read

Per serving, beef steak and bluefin tuna have nearly identical protein levels, both offering around 21 grams for a 3-ounce portion. This begs the question: Does tuna have more protein than steak, and which is the better nutritional choice for your health goals?

Quick Summary

While the protein content per serving is comparable between tuna and steak, the main nutritional differences are in fat profile, calories, and micronutrients. The better choice depends on your specific health objectives.

Key Points

  • Protein Content: Ounce for ounce, high-quality tuna and lean steak offer very similar amounts of protein.

  • Fat Profile: Tuna is typically much leaner and contains heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids, while steak can have higher levels of saturated fat.

  • Micronutrient Power: Tuna is a superior source of vitamin D and selenium, whereas steak provides more iron and zinc.

  • Calorie Count: For the same amount of protein, tuna is generally the lower-calorie option compared to steak.

  • Personal Preference: The "better" choice depends on your individual health goals, dietary needs, and flavor preferences.

In This Article

Protein Content: Ounce for Ounce Analysis

At first glance, the protein content of tuna and steak is remarkably similar. For instance, a 3-ounce portion of seared bluefin tuna offers about 21 grams of protein, a figure almost identical to a similarly sized grilled beef sirloin steak. The specific amount can vary slightly depending on the cut of steak or the type of tuna. Fresh tuna, such as yellowfin or bluefin, tends to have a slightly higher protein concentration per 100 grams than some canned varieties. However, canned tuna remains a potent and convenient source of protein, with many brands offering around 25 grams per 100-gram serving. A standardized 100-gram serving reveals just how close these foods are in protein, with tuna often measuring around 26-29 grams and steak typically falling within a similar range depending on the cut. Therefore, if protein quantity is your only consideration, the choice between them is a toss-up.

Beyond Protein: Fat and Calorie Profile

This is where the real differences emerge. Tuna is known for its lean profile, especially when compared to many cuts of beef. A 3-ounce tuna steak has less than 1.5 grams of saturated fat, whereas a beef sirloin steak of the same size may contain more than 3 grams. Tuna's fat content is predominantly composed of heart-healthy monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, including essential omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA). These omega-3s are crucial for reducing inflammation, improving brain function, and lowering the risk of heart disease. Steak, particularly red meat, is higher in saturated fat, which can raise LDL (bad) cholesterol levels. As a result, for those watching their fat and calorie intake, tuna is often the more advantageous choice, providing a significant protein boost with a fraction of the saturated fat and calories.

Micronutrient Showdown: Vitamins and Minerals

Both protein sources are rich in micronutrients, but their profiles differ. Tuna is a superior source of several key vitamins and minerals:

  • Selenium: Tuna is exceptionally high in this powerful antioxidant, providing significantly more than steak.
  • Vitamin D: Tuna contains a remarkable amount of vitamin D, which is essential for bone health and immune function.
  • Vitamins B3 and B6: Tuna is richer in these B vitamins, which play critical roles in energy metabolism.

In contrast, steak has the advantage in other areas:

  • Iron: Red meat is one of the best dietary sources of heme iron, which is highly bioavailable.
  • Zinc: Steak is packed with zinc, a mineral vital for immune function and cell growth.
  • Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin): Steak provides a higher amount of this B vitamin.

Therefore, your choice may depend on whether you need a boost in omega-3s and vitamin D or an increase in iron and zinc.

Nutritional Showdown: Tuna vs. Steak

Nutrient (per 100g) Tuna (Yellowfin, cooked) Steak (Sirloin, cooked)
Protein ~29 g ~29 g
Saturated Fat <1.5 g (per 85g) >3 g (per 85g)
Omega-3s (EPA+DHA) High Low/Absent
Iron Lower Higher
Zinc Lower Higher
Vitamin D Higher Lower
Selenium Higher Lower

Making the Best Choice for Your Health

When deciding between tuna and steak, consider these points based on your personal health objectives:

  • For heart health: Tuna is the clear winner due to its high omega-3 content and low saturated fat profile, which help lower cholesterol and inflammation.
  • For iron requirements: Steak, particularly red meat, is a more effective source of iron, making it an important dietary component for individuals with or at risk for iron deficiency.
  • For weight management: Tuna's lower calorie count per gram of protein makes it an excellent choice for those seeking to reduce overall calorie intake while maintaining high protein consumption.
  • For convenience: Canned tuna offers unparalleled convenience and shelf-stability, while fresh tuna and steak provide different culinary experiences and are best prepared fresh.
  • For mercury concerns: While most individuals can safely consume tuna in moderation, pregnant or lactating women should be mindful of mercury levels, particularly in albacore and bluefin varieties, and limit intake accordingly.

For additional protein and nutrition information, you can reference resources like those provided by the Johns Hopkins Center for Bariatric Surgery.

Conclusion

Ultimately, there is no single right answer to whether tuna or steak has more protein or is definitively healthier. They offer similar amounts of protein per serving, but their distinct nutritional profiles cater to different health needs. Tuna excels with its low saturated fat content and high levels of omega-3s, vitamin D, and selenium. Steak, on the other hand, is a superior source of iron and zinc. The best option is the one that aligns with your specific dietary goals, flavor preferences, and overall health considerations. Both can be valuable components of a balanced diet when chosen mindfully.

High-Protein Winner: For pure protein content, it's virtually a tie between tuna and steak. Leaner Profile: Tuna is generally much leaner, offering a lower-calorie, low-saturated-fat protein option. Cardiovascular Health: Tuna's rich omega-3 content makes it the healthier choice for heart health and reducing inflammation. Iron and Zinc: Steak is the better source for key minerals like iron and zinc. Diverse Nutrients: A balanced diet incorporating both can offer a wider range of vitamins and minerals, maximizing nutritional intake.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ounce for ounce, high-quality tuna and lean steak have very similar protein content. For example, a 3-ounce serving of either can provide around 21 grams of protein.

Tuna is often considered healthier due to its lower saturated fat and higher content of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids. However, steak provides more iron and zinc, which are also crucial nutrients.

The primary benefits of choosing tuna include its high concentration of omega-3 fatty acids for heart health, lower saturated fat and calories, and a rich supply of vitamin D and selenium.

Steak is a better choice when you need a significant source of iron and zinc. For those managing iron deficiency, the heme iron found in red meat is highly bioavailable.

Yes, certain types of tuna, especially larger varieties like albacore and bluefin, can contain higher levels of mercury. While typically safe for most in moderation, sensitive populations like pregnant women should limit consumption.

For both tuna and steak, the cooking method can impact the overall nutritional value. Grilling or searing with minimal added fat is often healthier than frying. Overcooking tuna can also make it dry and less appealing.

Canned tuna offers similar levels of protein and omega-3s to fresh tuna and provides added convenience. However, most canned tuna is cooked before canning, which slightly alters its nutritional profile compared to fresh.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.