Skip to content

Exploring the Evidence: Does Eating One Meal a Day Make You Live Longer?

3 min read

According to a 2023 study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, eating only one meal a day was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in adults aged 40 and older. This finding directly challenges the popular notion that does eating one meal a day make you live longer.

Quick Summary

The extreme One Meal A Day (OMAD) diet lacks robust human evidence for longevity benefits, with research pointing toward potential risks like increased mortality, nutrient deficiencies, and muscle loss. While intermittent fasting has demonstrated some health advantages, less restrictive methods appear safer and more sustainable than a 23-hour daily fast.

Key Points

  • No Human Evidence for Longevity: Contrary to popular belief, recent human studies do not support the claim that eating one meal a day (OMAD) leads to a longer lifespan.

  • Increased Mortality Risk: A 2023 study found that adults aged 40 and older who ate only one meal per day had a significantly higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality.

  • High Risk of Nutrient Deficiencies: It is extremely challenging to consume all necessary vitamins, minerals, and calories in a single meal, potentially leading to long-term health issues.

  • Unsustainable and Risky: OMAD can cause extreme hunger, fatigue, mood changes, and muscle loss, making it an unsustainable and potentially dangerous long-term dietary pattern for most people.

  • Safer Alternatives Exist: For those interested in fasting benefits, less restrictive methods like time-restricted eating (e.g., 16:8) are better studied, safer, and more sustainable than OMAD.

In This Article

The Allure and The Reality of One Meal a Day (OMAD)

In recent years, the One Meal a Day (OMAD) diet has gained considerable traction in the health and fitness world. As an extreme form of intermittent fasting (IF), OMAD involves consuming all daily calories within a single, narrow eating window—typically one to two hours—and fasting for the remaining 22 to 23 hours. The appeal is multifaceted: simplicity, potential for rapid weight loss, and the promise of a metabolic reset. Proponents often cite animal studies and general intermittent fasting research, suggesting that extended fasting periods can trigger cellular repair processes like autophagy and improve biomarkers associated with aging.

However, a closer look at the scientific literature, especially human studies, reveals a more complex and cautionary picture. The evidence supporting OMAD for increased longevity in humans is sparse and largely speculative, drawing conclusions from less restrictive forms of fasting or animal models. In fact, recent large-scale research points to potential dangers, casting a heavy shadow on the belief that this extreme dietary pattern is a shortcut to a longer life.

The Scientific Evidence: Debunking the Longevity Myth

While some animal studies in mice have shown that longer fasting times can improve health and extend lifespan, these findings do not directly translate to humans. Human life expectancy and dietary patterns are vastly different from those of lab animals, requiring dedicated and long-term human trials to draw firm conclusions. The longest-running human intermittent fasting studies have focused on less extreme patterns, like time-restricted eating within a 6 to 8-hour window, rather than OMAD.

The Alarming Findings of Recent Human Studies

A notable 2023 study involving over 24,000 U.S. adults aged 40 and older found a significant association between eating one meal a day and an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, this research is one of the most extensive human studies investigating the risks of skipping meals. The study authors suggested that consuming a large energy load in one sitting might stress glucose metabolism regulation, contributing to metabolic decline. The increased mortality risk was observed even after accounting for other lifestyle factors like smoking and alcohol use.

Significant Health Risks Associated with OMAD

Adopting a strict one-meal-a-day regimen carries several health risks. These include potential nutrient deficiencies, loss of muscle mass, metabolic disruption, extreme hunger, binge eating risks, hormonal imbalances, and low energy/fatigue.

OMAD vs. Other Intermittent Fasting Methods

Less extreme intermittent fasting methods may offer potential benefits without the risks of OMAD. A comparison reveals that OMAD's 23-hour fasting window and 1-hour eating window make nutrient balance difficult and pose higher metabolic risks, lacking strong human evidence for longevity. In contrast, methods like Time-Restricted Eating (e.g., 16:8) with a 16-hour fast and 8-hour eating window or the 5:2 Diet are generally considered more manageable for nutrient intake, show potential for improving metabolic markers with less risk, and are more sustainable long-term.

Who Should Avoid OMAD?

Certain populations should avoid OMAD due to significant health risks, including pregnant or breastfeeding individuals, children and teenagers, older adults, people with diabetes, and those with a history of eating disorders.

The Bottom Line on Nutrition and Longevity

Sustainable, balanced nutrition, regular exercise, and healthy habits are the most effective approaches for long-term health and longevity. Extreme diets like OMAD lack sufficient human evidence for longevity benefits and carry considerable health risks, making less restrictive and more balanced dietary patterns a safer choice.


Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider or a registered dietitian before making significant changes to your diet.

For more information on the risks associated with meal skipping, consider reviewing the full 2023 study in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics at {Link: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2022.08.119}.

Frequently Asked Questions

Current large-scale human research does not support the claim that eating one meal a day extends lifespan. In fact, a 2023 study linked eating one meal a day to an increased risk of mortality, particularly from cardiovascular disease, in older adults.

While OMAD may lead to weight loss by creating a calorie deficit, it is often unsustainable and can cause a loss of lean muscle mass along with fat. Less restrictive diets have shown similar weight loss results without the associated risks.

Significant risks include nutrient deficiencies, loss of muscle mass, metabolic problems (like higher fasting blood sugar and cholesterol), fatigue, and a high risk of disordered eating, such as binge eating.

OMAD is not recommended for pregnant or breastfeeding women, children, teenagers, older adults, people with diabetes, or anyone with a history of eating disorders.

Yes, safer and more sustainable alternatives include other forms of intermittent fasting, such as time-restricted eating (like the 16:8 method), or simply adopting a balanced, nutritious diet with regular exercise.

Some animal studies suggest that longer fasting periods may improve health and extend lifespan, but research on humans is limited and has focused on less extreme fasting methods than OMAD. Any potential benefits are likely tied to less restrictive fasting patterns.

Focus on adopting a well-rounded and nutrient-dense eating pattern, like the Mediterranean diet, rather than extreme fasting. A balanced diet, along with regular exercise and a healthy lifestyle, is the most proven path to health and longevity.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.