Skip to content

How many calories do insects have? The complete nutritional guide

5 min read

With over 2,300 species of edible insects consumed globally, their caloric and nutritional value is gaining serious attention. This guide will break down exactly how many calories do insects have and what factors influence their energy content, providing a comprehensive nutritional overview. Insects are emerging as a sustainable and nutrient-dense food source for the future.

Quick Summary

This article explores the caloric content of various edible insects, detailing how factors like species, developmental stage, and preparation methods impact their energy value. A nutritional comparison with traditional protein sources highlights their potential as a healthy, sustainable food alternative rich in protein and micronutrients.

Key Points

  • Variable Caloric Content: The number of calories in insects varies greatly depending on the species, developmental stage, and how they are prepared.

  • Life Stage Matters: Larvae and pupae are typically higher in fat and therefore calories than adult insects.

  • Rich in Macronutrients: Insects are generally rich in protein and fats, with calories derived primarily from these macronutrients.

  • Crickets vs. Mealworms: Dried crickets have a slightly lower caloric density but a similar protein punch compared to dry-roasted mealworms, which are higher in fat and total calories.

  • Sustainable Superfood: Insects offer high nutritional value, including healthy fats, vitamins, and minerals, with a significantly lower environmental footprint than livestock.

  • Dietary Fiber from Chitin: The exoskeleton of insects contains chitin, a prebiotic fiber that contributes to gut health.

  • Preparation Affects Calories: Drying concentrates calories by removing water, while frying can add extra fat and calories from the cooking oil.

In This Article

Understanding the Caloric Profile of Insects

The question of exactly how many calories do insects have is complex, as the answer varies significantly depending on several key factors. Unlike a standard food item with a fixed nutritional label, an insect's caloric content is influenced by its species, life stage (larva, pupa, or adult), diet, and processing method. For example, larvae and pupae often have a higher fat content than adult insects, leading to a greater number of calories. The nutrient density of insects, which includes protein, fats, and carbohydrates, directly determines their energy value. The fat content, in particular, is a major driver of calories, and can vary widely from 8% to 70% based on dry weight, with some species being naturally leaner than others. Processing methods, such as drying, roasting, or frying, also dramatically alter the final caloric count by removing moisture and concentrating nutrients.

Factors Influencing Insect Calorie Count

  • Species Diversity: The sheer number of edible insect species means there is no single answer for caloric value. A mealworm, for example, has a different energy profile than a grasshopper. Studies have shown ranges from around 200 kcal/100g up to over 700 kcal/100g (dry weight) across different species.
  • Developmental Stage: Immature insects, specifically larvae and pupae, typically contain a higher percentage of fat and thus more calories than their adult counterparts. This is a crucial consideration for commercial insect farming aimed at optimizing nutritional yield.
  • Diet and Rearing Conditions: The feed provided to farmed insects directly impacts their macronutrient composition. A diet rich in fatty acids can result in higher caloric insects. This offers a level of control over the final nutritional product that is not possible with wild-caught insects.
  • Processing Method: Dried or roasted insects will have a higher concentration of calories per 100g than fresh insects because the water content has been removed. Frying, on the other hand, can add significant calories and fat depending on the oil used.

A Look at Specific Insect Calories

To provide a clearer picture, here is a breakdown of the approximate caloric values for some of the most commonly consumed insects, typically provided on a dry-weight basis. This data offers a tangible reference point for understanding the energy potential of these alternative protein sources.

  • Mealworms (Tenebrio molitor): These larvae are a popular and commercially farmed insect. Dry-roasted mealworms can contain around 484–637 kcal per 100g, with the exact figure varying based on the drying process and feed. They are also a good source of protein, fat, and minerals.
  • Crickets (Acheta domesticus): A common ingredient in protein powders and snack bars, crickets typically offer a high-protein, lower-fat profile than mealworms. Dry cricket powder contains about 472 kcal per 100g. Crickets are notable for their protein content and are often compared favorably to beef on a per-protein basis.
  • Grasshoppers (Locusta migratoria): Often consumed whole, roasted, or fried, grasshoppers are a significant food source in many cultures. Dried grasshoppers typically have a caloric value in the range of 336–485 kcal per 100g. Their nutritional composition can vary, but they provide a good balance of protein and healthy fats.
  • Ants (Various species): The nutritional profile of ants depends heavily on the species and life stage. Leafcutter ants, for instance, are very energy-dense with approximately 454 calories per 100g, while red ants offer fewer calories but a strong mineral profile.

Comparison of Insect Calories to Traditional Protein Sources

When evaluating insects as a food source, it is useful to compare their nutritional content to more conventional meats. This reveals that insects are not only comparable in energy density but often surpass them in overall nutrient efficiency. Insects also offer a more complete use of the whole animal (around 80% edible) compared to livestock (around 40% edible), maximizing the nutritional return on the food consumed.

Caloric and Nutritional Comparison (per 100g, dry weight)

Food Source Approximate Calories Protein (g) Fat (g) Notes
Mealworms (larvae) 500-600 kcal 45-60 25-37 High in essential fatty acids
Crickets 472 kcal 58 24 Contains fiber from chitin
Beef (sirloin) 200 kcal 19-26 10-15 (varies) Lower protein density per calorie than many insects
Chicken Breast ~165 kcal ~31 ~3.6 Comparatively lower fat but no fiber

The Importance of Bioavailability

It is also worth noting that insects contain nutrients that are highly bio-available, meaning the body can readily absorb and use them. For example, the iron in insects has a high bioavailability, making it a viable alternative for supplementation. Furthermore, insects offer a host of other health benefits beyond their basic macronutrients, such as essential fatty acids, vitamins (especially B12), and minerals like magnesium, iron, and zinc.

Sustainable Nutrition for the Future

As the world's population continues to grow, the demand for sustainable food sources is escalating. The farming of insects is significantly more environmentally friendly than traditional livestock. It requires far less land, water, and feed, and produces a fraction of the greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, crickets require 12 times less feed than cattle to produce the same amount of protein. This efficiency, combined with their high nutritional value, positions insects as a crucial component of future food security strategies.

Health Benefits Beyond Calories

Beyond their energy content, edible insects provide numerous health benefits:

  • High-Quality Protein: Insects contain all essential amino acids, making their protein a complete source similar to animal protein.
  • Rich in Micronutrients: They are packed with essential vitamins and minerals, including B vitamins, iron, and zinc, often in higher concentrations than beef.
  • Excellent Source of Healthy Fats: Many species are rich in beneficial omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids.
  • Source of Prebiotic Fiber: The chitin in their exoskeleton acts as a prebiotic fiber, which can promote a healthy gut microbiome.

Conclusion

In conclusion, how many calories do insects have is a question with a varied and impressive answer. The caloric content of insects is highly dependent on species, life stage, diet, and processing. From protein-rich crickets to fat-dense mealworms, these alternative food sources offer a wide spectrum of nutritional value, often rivaling or exceeding that of conventional meat. Their sustainability, coupled with a dense nutritional profile, makes them a compelling food source for the future. By understanding and utilizing the diverse caloric and health benefits of edible insects, we can work towards a more sustainable and nutrient-secure global food system.


Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security


Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, on a dry-weight basis, many edible insects offer a comparable or higher calorie and protein density than beef or chicken, along with other beneficial nutrients.

No, the caloric content varies dramatically among species. For example, fat-rich larvae have more calories than leaner adult insects like certain grasshoppers.

Cooking methods alter the calorie count. Drying or roasting concentrates nutrients and increases calories per gram, while frying adds extra calories and fat from the oil.

Yes. While some insects, especially larvae, are higher in fat, certain species like crickets are excellent for high-protein, lower-fat diets. Opting for dehydrated insects or cricket flour is also a great approach.

Yes, the diet of farmed insects is a significant factor. A diet rich in fatty acids will result in a higher caloric and fat content in the final product.

Yes, many edible insects contain all nine essential amino acids required by the human body, classifying their protein as 'complete' and highly digestible.

For most people, no. However, due to the high fat content in some species (like certain larvae), it is wise for those watching their caloric intake to pay attention to the specific insect and preparation method. Allergies are also a possibility, similar to shellfish allergies.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.