Skip to content

Is almond milk or oat milk less calories at Starbucks?

3 min read

According to nutritionists, almond milk generally has the lowest calories per serving of all plant-based milk alternatives. This makes almond milk a clear winner when asking, 'is almond milk or oat milk less calories at Starbucks?'

Quick Summary

Starbucks' almond milk contains significantly fewer calories per serving than their oat milk, with almond milk at approximately 60 calories per 8oz and oat milk at around 120-140 calories for the same amount. Calorie content varies depending on the specific barista brand and added ingredients, but almond milk is consistently the lower-calorie choice for non-dairy milk options at the coffee shop.

Key Points

  • Almond Milk is Lower in Calories: At Starbucks, almond milk contains approximately 60 calories per 8-ounce serving, while oat milk has 120-140 calories for the same amount.

  • Oat Milk is Creamier and Higher in Carbs: The barista-style oat milk used at Starbucks has a richer texture and higher carbohydrate content, which contributes to its higher calorie count.

  • Nutritional Trade-Offs: While almond milk is the lower-calorie option, oat milk contains more protein and beneficial fiber, like beta-glucans.

  • Customization is Key: Reduce overall calories by using almond milk, asking for sugar-free syrups, and skipping whipped cream.

  • Flavor Profile Matters: Choose almond for a nutty flavor or oat for a creamy, naturally sweeter taste, but be aware of the caloric difference.

  • Consider Half-and-Half: For a balance of creaminess and fewer calories than full oat milk, some customers suggest a half-almond, half-oat milk blend.

In This Article

Comparing Caloric Content: Almond vs. Oat Milk at Starbucks

When ordering a beverage at Starbucks, choosing a milk alternative is a popular way to customize your drink. For those counting calories, the difference between almond and oat milk is significant. At Starbucks, almond milk is consistently the lower-calorie option, while oat milk provides a creamier texture and higher carbohydrate content. The specific brand of oat milk used can vary by location, which may cause some minor fluctuations in its caloric content, but almond milk remains the leaner choice across the board.

Breaking Down the Calories

To understand the difference, let's look at the caloric breakdown per 8-ounce serving, a standard measurement. Starbucks' almond milk contains approximately 60 calories, making it one of the lowest-calorie non-dairy options. On the other hand, the oat milk used by Starbucks can range from about 120 to 140 calories per 8-ounce serving. For a larger drink, like a grande or venti, this difference becomes even more pronounced. For instance, a grande latte contains roughly 16 fluid ounces of milk, meaning an oat milk swap could add an extra 120 to 160 calories compared to an almond milk swap.

Nutritional Differences Beyond Calories

While calories are a key factor, the two milks differ in other ways that might influence your choice. Here is a more detailed comparison:

  • Protein: Both almond and oat milk from Starbucks are lower in protein compared to dairy milk. However, almond milk offers less protein than oat milk per serving, with almond milk at about 2 grams and oat milk at around 4 grams. If you want a more satisfying and filling drink, a different option like soy milk (which has more protein) or nonfat dairy milk might be preferable.
  • Carbohydrates: Oat milk is much higher in carbohydrates than almond milk, contributing to its richer texture and higher calorie count. This makes oat milk a better choice if you are seeking a bit of an energy boost from your beverage.
  • Fiber: Oat milk, derived from whole oats, contains a good amount of fiber, including beta-glucans, which are known to support heart health. Almond milk contains minimal fiber.
  • Fat: Almond milk at Starbucks contains less fat per serving than the barista-style oat milk, which has added oils to help with frothing.
  • Sweetness: The oat milk at Starbucks tends to have a more naturally sweet, creamy flavor profile, while the almond milk is much nuttier. Both may contain added sugar, so it's always best to check the nutritional information for the specific brand used in your region, or ask your barista.

Making the Right Choice for Your Drink

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities. If your main goal is to minimize caloric intake, almond milk is the definitive winner. If you're seeking a creamy texture or higher fiber content and don't mind the additional calories, oat milk is a great alternative. For a lower-calorie, richer flavor, consider mixing milks—some baristas report that a half-almond, half-oat milk blend can offer a balanced experience with fewer calories than a full oat milk serving. Customizing your order by asking for fewer pumps of syrup can also drastically reduce the total calorie count, regardless of the milk you choose.

How to Order Your Drink to Save Calories

Beyond just switching your milk, here are a few tips for a lower-calorie Starbucks order:

  • Choose almond milk over oat, soy, or dairy milks.
  • Request sugar-free syrup alternatives, such as sugar-free vanilla.
  • Order a Caffè Misto with almond milk instead of a full latte, as it uses less milk overall.
  • For flavored lattes, ask for fewer pumps of the sweetened syrup.
  • Avoid whipped cream, as this adds a significant number of calories.

Comparison Table: Almond Milk vs. Oat Milk at Starbucks (Per 8oz Serving)

Nutrient Almond Milk (Approx.) Oat Milk (Approx.)
Calories 60 120-140
Protein 2g 4g
Carbohydrates 5-6g 23-24g
Fat 4g 8g
Texture Thinner, nuttier Creamier, richer
Key Benefit Lowest calories Creaminess, higher fiber

Conclusion

For those focused on minimizing their caloric intake at Starbucks, almond milk is the indisputable choice. Providing a light, nutty flavor with fewer than half the calories of its oat milk counterpart, it offers a healthier starting point for any beverage. While oat milk delivers a satisfyingly creamy texture, its higher calorie and carbohydrate count makes it less suitable for strictly low-calorie diets. By understanding the nutritional differences and customizing your order, you can enjoy your favorite coffee drinks while staying mindful of your health and wellness goals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Starbucks' almond milk contains less sugar than their oat milk. Both may have added sugar, but the oat milk has a naturally higher sugar content from the oats themselves.

Yes, many customers request this customization. Mixing almond milk and oat milk can provide a good balance of creaminess with fewer calories than a drink made entirely with oat milk.

Oat milk generally performs better for frothing at Starbucks due to its higher fat and carbohydrate content, which creates a creamier and more stable foam, especially with barista editions.

A grande latte at Starbucks uses approximately 16 ounces of milk. With almond milk (~60 calories per 8oz), the milk alone would add about 120 calories, plus the espresso, for a low-calorie total.

A grande latte at Starbucks with oat milk uses about 16 ounces of milk. With oat milk (~120-140 calories per 8oz), the milk would add approximately 240-280 calories, plus the espresso.

Almond milk is the lowest calorie non-dairy milk option available at Starbucks, containing about 60 calories per 8-ounce serving.

While it varies by region, Starbucks has made some non-dairy milk substitutions, including almond and oat milk, free of charge in many locations.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.