Skip to content

Is Bioengineered Food Safe to Consume? A Comprehensive Look

5 min read

Over 95% of animals used for meat and dairy in the United States consume bioengineered crops. Despite this widespread integration into the food supply chain, a critical question remains for many consumers: is bioengineered food safe to consume? We delve into the scientific consensus, regulatory oversight, and common concerns to provide a balanced overview.

Quick Summary

The vast majority of scientific and regulatory bodies state that bioengineered foods are as safe and healthy as their conventional counterparts. This stance is supported by decades of research and rigorous safety assessments conducted worldwide.

Key Points

  • Scientific Consensus: Major international and national health organizations agree that bioengineered foods are as safe as conventional foods.

  • Rigorous Regulation: BE foods undergo extensive safety assessments by agencies like the FDA, EPA, and USDA before they can be sold to the public.

  • No Unique Risks: Decades of research have found no verifiable scientific evidence that bioengineered foods pose unique long-term health risks compared to traditionally bred foods.

  • Targeted Benefits: Bioengineering can introduce specific beneficial traits, like enhanced nutritional content or resistance to pests, which is a more precise process than conventional breeding.

  • Labeling Standards: In the US, the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard requires labeling for foods with detectable modified genetic material, but it has specific exemptions.

  • Environmental Trade-offs: Some BE crops can reduce overall insecticide use, while others are linked to increased use of specific herbicides, a complex factor in their environmental impact.

  • Animal Safety: Studies confirm that foods from animals that have consumed BE feed are just as safe and nutritious as those from animals that have not.

In This Article

What is Bioengineered Food?

Bioengineered (BE) food is a term for food that contains detectable genetic material modified through specific lab techniques, which could not have been achieved through conventional breeding or found in nature. In the United States, the USDA uses the term "bioengineered" under the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, while “genetically modified organism” or “GMO” is a broader, more common term that often overlaps.

The Science Behind Bioengineering

Unlike traditional cross-breeding, which can introduce multiple unknown genetic changes, bioengineering allows scientists to make precise, targeted modifications to an organism's DNA. This can introduce beneficial traits, such as resistance to pests, disease, or drought, or enhance the nutritional content of the food. For example, some soybeans have been modified to produce healthier oils, and potatoes have been engineered to produce less acrylamide, a potential carcinogen, when cooked at high temperatures.

How is Bioengineered Food Tested for Safety?

Before any bioengineered food can be sold, it undergoes extensive safety evaluations. In the US, this process involves oversight from multiple government agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the USDA.

Testing focuses on potential risks such as:

  • Allergenicity: Ensuring that no new allergens are introduced. If a gene is transferred from an allergenic organism, its protein product must be rigorously tested to confirm it is not allergenic itself.
  • Toxicity: Assessing the potential for toxic compounds, a risk that also exists with conventional foods.
  • Nutritional Impact: Comparing the nutritional profile to its non-bioengineered counterpart to ensure no decrease in healthfulness.
  • Long-Term Effects: Analyzing the potential for any adverse effects over time. Decades of research have shown no health patterns correlating with BE food consumption in countries where it is common.

Bioengineered Food Regulations

In the US, the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard requires manufacturers, importers, and retailers to disclose if a food product is bioengineered or contains bioengineered ingredients. This standard came into full effect in 2022. It allows for text, a symbol, or an electronic/digital link disclosure. However, some exemptions apply, such as highly refined foods that no longer contain detectable modified genetic material.

The Global Consensus on Safety

Leading international health and science organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, have reviewed the available evidence and concluded that currently marketed bioengineered foods are as safe as their traditional counterparts. These organizations state that the use of bioengineering does not introduce unique risks to the food supply.

Comparison of Bioengineered vs. Conventional Farming

Feature Bioengineered (BE) Farming Conventional Farming
Pest Control Can reduce pesticide use through pest-resistant crops (e.g., Bt crops), or can lead to increased use of specific herbicides with herbicide-tolerant crops. Relies on conventional pesticides and insecticides, which can be sprayed more frequently.
Yields Often associated with higher, more reliable crop yields due to resistance to pests, disease, or drought. Yields can be less predictable and more susceptible to environmental factors like pests or diseases.
Nutritional Value Can be identical or enhanced. Some BE crops are designed to have improved nutritional content, such as soybeans with healthier oils. Varies widely depending on the crop and growing conditions.
Gene Transfer Involves precise, targeted genetic modifications in a laboratory setting. Relies on traditional selective breeding over many generations, which can result in unintended traits.
Environmental Impact Can offer benefits like reduced soil tilling and lower fuel use. Concerns exist about potential crossbreeding with wild relatives and increased herbicide use in some cases. Can contribute to environmental issues like soil depletion and water contamination from frequent pesticide applications.

Conclusion: A Data-Driven Perspective

The question of whether bioengineered food is safe to consume is answered by an overwhelming body of scientific evidence. Decades of research, backed by multiple regulatory and health organizations worldwide, have established that bioengineered foods are as safe and nutritious as their traditional counterparts. The development process, which includes extensive safety testing for allergenicity, toxicity, and nutritional content, is more rigorous than that for conventionally bred foods. While concerns about the long-term effects and environmental impacts, such as biodiversity and herbicide use, continue to be debated, the evidence does not support claims of unique health risks to consumers. Ultimately, understanding the science and regulatory processes behind these foods allows consumers to make informed choices based on data rather than fear. For more information, the FDA provides a valuable resource on agricultural biotechnology [https://www.fda.gov/food/consumers/agricultural-biotechnology].

Common Concerns Addressed

  • Is it true that bioengineered crops lead to greater use of pesticides? Some bioengineered crops, specifically those tolerant to herbicides, have led to an increase in the use of those particular herbicides. However, other bioengineered crops are designed to be pest-resistant, which reduces the overall need for certain spray insecticides. The EPA regulates the safe use of all pesticides on both BE and conventional crops.
  • Could eating bioengineered food lead to allergies? No, bioengineered foods currently on the market are not more likely to cause allergies than their traditional counterparts. The development process includes specific allergenicity testing to ensure that common allergens are not transferred. If you are allergic to conventional soy, you will be allergic to bioengineered soy, but not simply because it is bioengineered.
  • Is there a higher risk of cancer from bioengineered foods? No, numerous studies, including large-scale comparisons between regions that consume significant amounts of BE foods and those that do not, have found no differences in patterns of cancer or other diseases. The rigorous safety assessments ensure that new genetic traits do not pose a cancer risk.
  • What are the long-term effects of bioengineered food on humans? Based on decades of widespread consumption and extensive research, no unique or long-term health risks have been identified with bioengineered foods compared to conventional foods. Continuous monitoring is part of the regulatory process as technology evolves.
  • Do bioengineered foods have fewer nutrients? Not necessarily. Most bioengineered crops have the same nutritional value as their non-engineered counterparts. In some cases, the technology is used to enhance the nutritional profile, such as increasing vitamin or mineral content.
  • Is the bioengineered label the same as non-GMO? No, the USDA's bioengineered (BE) label is not the same as the Non-GMO Project certification. The BE label identifies foods with detectable modified genetic material. However, highly refined products from bioengineered sources, like sugar or oil, may not require the label if the modified DNA is no longer detectable.
  • Do bioengineered genes transfer to humans or bacteria? The transfer of genes from BE food to human cells or gut bacteria is highly unlikely and poses no known health concerns. Standard digestive processes break down genetic material. Regulatory agencies encourage methods that do not involve antibiotic resistance marker genes to mitigate any potential, albeit low, risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

In the United States, "bioengineered" is the term specified by law for foods containing detectable modified genetic material. "GMO" (genetically modified organism) is a broader, more common term for organisms created through genetic modification. Due to disclosure standards, some highly refined products made from bioengineered crops are not labeled as BE because the modified genetic material is no longer detectable, but they would still be considered GMOs by many.

No, according to the USDA's National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, food derived from an animal is not considered bioengineered solely because the animal consumed bioengineered feed. Decades of research have shown no nutritional or safety differences in animal products from animals fed BE crops.

Scientists developing bioengineered foods perform extensive allergenicity testing. As a principle, the transfer of genes from known allergenic organisms is discouraged unless testing can demonstrate the resulting protein is not allergenic. The FDA requires that foods derived from bioengineering be as safe as their non-bioengineered counterparts, which includes extensive allergy testing.

The use of antibiotic resistance genes as markers during the creation of some bioengineered foods has raised concerns, but the WHO notes the probability of gene transfer to bacteria is low. Regulatory agencies now encourage technologies that do not use these genes. No connection has been established between bioengineered foods and increased antibiotic resistance in humans.

Like all scientific research, results can vary based on study design, funding sources, and interpretations. However, the vast majority of peer-reviewed, independent, and regulatory-driven studies conclude that BE foods are safe. In some high-profile cases, controversial studies have been retracted or debunked by more rigorous follow-up research.

Yes, some bioengineered crops are developed specifically to enhance nutritional value. For example, certain soybeans have been modified to produce healthier oils, and "Golden Rice" was engineered to increase beta-carotene content to combat vitamin A deficiency in developing countries.

No, the USDA National Organic Program standards prohibit the use of genetically engineered ingredients in certified organic products. Therefore, organic foods are exempt from the bioengineered labeling requirements and are considered non-GMO.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.