Skip to content

Is Canned Tuna Healthier in Water or Oil? A Complete Nutritional Breakdown

5 min read

A 5-ounce can of chunk light tuna in oil can have over twice the calories of the same size can packed in water. Understanding this significant difference is key to determining if canned tuna is healthier in water or oil for your dietary needs.

Quick Summary

This nutritional comparison examines calories, fat, omega-3 content, and texture differences between water-packed and oil-packed tuna. The best choice depends on individual health goals, such as weight management, flavor preference, and nutrient absorption.

Key Points

  • Calories and Fat: Water-packed tuna contains significantly fewer calories and less fat than tuna packed in oil.

  • Omega-3s: Water-packed tuna retains more of its natural omega-3 fatty acids if drained, while oil-packed tuna can lose some when the oil is discarded.

  • Flavor and Texture: Oil-packed tuna has a richer, moister texture, while water-packed tuna is firmer and has a milder flavor.

  • Recipe Use: Water-packed tuna is ideal for recipes where a firmer texture and lower fat content are preferred, while oil-packed shines in dishes where a richer flavor and moisture are desired.

  • Mercury Levels: Opt for 'light' or 'skipjack' tuna to minimize mercury intake, as these smaller species are lower in the element than larger albacore tuna.

In This Article

Water-Packed vs. Oil-Packed Tuna: The Primary Differences

At its core, the main difference between water-packed and oil-packed canned tuna lies in its caloric and fat content. Packing tuna in oil, typically vegetable or olive oil, increases its calorie and fat count significantly. Conversely, tuna packed in water is a much leaner option, with fewer calories and less fat. The choice between the two can depend heavily on your dietary goals, whether you are managing your weight or simply aiming for a specific nutritional profile.

Flavor and Texture

Beyond the raw nutritional data, the choice of packing medium also dramatically affects the fish's flavor and texture.

  • Oil-Packed: The oil infuses into the fish, resulting in a richer, more succulent flavor and a softer texture. Many find this version to be more palatable straight from the can. If packed in high-quality olive oil, it can also add healthy monounsaturated fats to your meal. This version is particularly well-suited for pasta dishes, salads where the oil contributes to the dressing, and crostini.
  • Water-Packed: The water-packed variety has a much milder, cleaner taste, allowing the tuna's natural flavor to stand out. It also boasts a firmer, flakier texture that holds up well in recipes like tuna patties or casseroles.

The Omega-3 Debate: Who Wins?

One of the most valuable nutrients in tuna is its omega-3 fatty acid content, which is beneficial for heart and brain health. The packing liquid's effect on these healthy fats is a frequent point of discussion.

Here's the breakdown:

  • Water-Packed: Since water and oil don't mix, the tuna's natural omega-3s are largely retained in the fish's flesh. As a result, when you drain the water, you keep more of the inherent omega-3s.
  • Oil-Packed: When you drain oil-packed tuna, some of the oil-soluble omega-3s can leach into the packing oil and be poured away. This can lead to a lower final omega-3 count in the drained fish compared to its water-packed counterpart. However, some brands claim that their oil-packed versions are a good source of omega-3s, so it is important to check the label.

Other Nutritional Considerations

Vitamins and Minerals

Both types of canned tuna are excellent sources of lean protein, B vitamins (especially B12), and the antioxidant mineral selenium. However, some oil-packed varieties may contain higher levels of fat-soluble vitamins, such as vitamin D. This is a minor difference, as tuna is not the most significant source of vitamin D in most diets.

Sodium Content

Canned tuna can be high in sodium, regardless of whether it's packed in water or oil. Many brands offer low-sodium or no-salt-added options for those monitoring their salt intake. Always check the nutrition label to be sure.

Mercury and Sustainability

Mercury is a concern with tuna consumption, as larger tuna species tend to accumulate more of it. For this reason, choosing canned "light" tuna (typically skipjack), which comes from smaller fish, is recommended for regular consumption. Albacore (or "white") tuna is larger and has higher mercury levels, so it should be consumed less frequently. Seeking brands with sustainability certifications, like the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label, also ensures more responsible fishing practices.

Comparison: Tuna in Water vs. Tuna in Oil

Feature Tuna in Water Tuna in Oil
Calories Lower (e.g., ~116 per 4 oz) Higher (e.g., ~200-210 per 4 oz)
Fat Content Lower Higher
Texture Firmer, flakier Softer, richer, more moist
Flavor Milder, cleaner Richer, more succulent
Omega-3s Retains more after draining May lose some when drained
Best for Tuna salad, patties, weight loss Pasta, gourmet sandwiches, richer recipes

Making the Healthiest Choice for You

Ultimately, the healthiest choice between canned tuna in water or oil depends on your personal health goals and how you plan to use it. The core nutritional profile of the fish—its protein, selenium, and B vitamins—remains consistent. Your decision primarily hinges on two factors:

  1. Calories and Weight Management: For those watching their caloric intake, water-packed tuna is the clear winner. Its lower fat content makes it a more suitable option for weight loss.
  2. Flavor and Recipe Application: If you prioritize a richer flavor and moister texture, oil-packed tuna is superior. It can also reduce or eliminate the need for calorie-heavy additions like mayonnaise in some recipes.

How to Choose the Healthiest Canned Tuna

  • Prioritize Light Tuna: Choose light or skipjack tuna more often to minimize mercury intake.
  • Drain It: Always drain the liquid, whether water or oil, to control sodium and calorie intake.
  • Check the Label: Look for low-sodium or no-salt-added versions and verify the type of oil if purchasing oil-packed tuna. Some brands use higher quality olive oil, while others use lower-quality vegetable oils.
  • Use the Right Type: Use water-packed for lean meals like tuna salad with yogurt, and use high-quality oil-packed for dishes where the richness is an advantage.
  • Consider Sustainable Options: Look for the MSC certification label to choose tuna from sustainably managed fisheries.

Conclusion

Neither water-packed nor oil-packed tuna is inherently "unhealthy," but they serve different dietary and culinary purposes. For those focused on a low-calorie, low-fat meal, water-packed tuna is the healthier choice. For those seeking richer flavor and moister texture, and perhaps a bonus of healthy fats from the packing oil, the oil-packed version is preferable. By considering your individual needs and the preparation method, you can make the right decision for your next meal.

For more detailed nutritional information and comparison data, refer to the source materials provided by institutions like Healthline, which offers a comprehensive guide to canned tuna.

Quick Tips for Cooking with Canned Tuna

  • For a lighter tuna salad: Use water-packed tuna, mashed avocado, and a squeeze of lemon juice instead of mayonnaise.
  • For a flavorful pasta: Use high-quality oil-packed tuna and the oil from the can to sauté garlic and chili flakes before tossing with cooked pasta.
  • For quick tuna patties: Use water-packed tuna for a firmer texture that holds its shape better when cooked.
  • For a Mediterranean-style salad: Combine oil-packed tuna with cannellini beans, red onion, and lemon juice.
  • For a healthy snack: Top cucumber slices or crackers with water-packed tuna mixed with a little mustard and seasoning.

The Final Takeaway

Your choice should be guided by your health priorities. Water-packed is for calorie control, while oil-packed provides richer flavor. Both are good sources of protein and other nutrients, but savvy consumption, like choosing light tuna and minding sodium, is key.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, water-packed tuna is generally better for weight loss because it contains fewer calories and less fat than oil-packed tuna. Its high protein content also promotes satiety, helping to manage cravings.

Yes, when you drain the oil from oil-packed tuna, you are also discarding some of the oil-soluble omega-3 fatty acids that have leached from the fish into the oil.

Tuna packed in oil has a richer, more succulent flavor than water-packed tuna. The oil infuses into the fish, enhancing its taste and texture.

For more regular consumption, choose light or skipjack tuna. These smaller fish typically have lower mercury levels than albacore ('white') tuna, making them a safer choice over time.

To reduce sodium, look for brands that offer 'low-sodium' or 'no-salt-added' options. Always draining the liquid, whether it's oil or water, can also help lower the sodium content.

Not necessarily. While it is higher in fat and calories, oil-packed tuna can still be a healthy choice, especially if packed in high-quality olive oil. The added healthy fats can enhance flavor and nutrient absorption, and if you use the oil in your recipe, it can add nutritional value.

For the highest retention of omega-3s, choose water-packed tuna and drain the water. Since water and oil don't mix, the omega-3s largely stay within the fish's flesh.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.