Skip to content

Is it safe to eat bio-engineered foods? A comprehensive guide

5 min read

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), bio-engineered foods currently on the international market have passed safety assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health. This consensus, backed by major regulatory bodies, provides a crucial starting point for exploring the question: is it safe to eat bio-engineered foods?

Quick Summary

Current scientific consensus from leading health organizations indicates that bioengineered foods are safe for consumption, nutritionally comparable to their conventional counterparts, and rigorously tested.

Key Points

  • Scientific Consensus: The overwhelming scientific evidence, backed by global regulatory bodies, indicates that currently available bio-engineered foods are safe to eat.

  • Rigorous Testing: Bio-engineered foods undergo more extensive safety testing and regulatory oversight than conventionally bred foods.

  • Nutritionally Equivalent: Studies generally find no significant nutritional differences between bio-engineered foods and their non-modified counterparts.

  • Labeling is for Transparency: The Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard requires labeling for transparency, not to indicate a health risk.

  • Allergy Risk is Monitored: Developers must test for potential allergens, and no allergic effects have been found relative to GM foods currently on the market.

  • Benefits to Food Supply: Bio-engineering can increase crop yields, improve nutrient content, and reduce pesticide usage for insect resistance.

In This Article

What are Bio-Engineered Foods?

Bio-engineered foods, often referred to by the public as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), are crops or ingredients that have had their genetic material (DNA) changed using specific laboratory techniques. This process is distinct from traditional selective breeding, which has been used for centuries to improve crops. Genetic engineering allows for the targeted transfer of specific traits, such as insect resistance, herbicide tolerance, or enhanced nutritional content.

The Science Behind the Safety Consensus

Multiple global and national scientific bodies have conducted extensive research and reviews on the safety of bio-engineered foods. Their collective findings support the safety of currently available bio-engineered products for human consumption. A 2016 report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine found no substantiated evidence that foods from bio-engineered crops are less safe than their non-bio-engineered counterparts. The scientific evaluation typically relies on a comparative approach, assessing the bio-engineered food against its closest non-modified equivalent to identify any significant changes in safety or nutrition.

Regulatory Oversight Ensures Safety

Before any bio-engineered food is allowed on the market, it must undergo strict regulatory review in many countries. In the United States, several agencies share this responsibility:

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Evaluates the safety of the food for human and animal consumption.
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA): Confirms that bio-engineered plants are safe to grow and do not pose a risk to other plants or the environment.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Assesses the safety of pesticides, including those incorporated into bio-engineered plants for pest resistance.

Benefits of Bio-Engineered Foods

The benefits of bio-engineered foods extend beyond just safety and include improvements for both consumers and producers.

  • Increased Crop Yields and Stability: Genetic modifications can increase a crop's productivity and resilience to environmental threats like pests, diseases, and harsh weather conditions, helping to ensure a more reliable food supply.
  • Enhanced Nutrition: Some bio-engineered crops are developed to improve their nutritional value. For instance, 'Golden Rice' was engineered to contain beta-carotene, a precursor to Vitamin A, to help combat nutritional deficiencies.
  • Reduced Pesticide Use: Crops engineered for insect resistance, such as Bt corn and Bt cotton, require fewer chemical insecticide sprays. This reduces farmer exposure to pesticides and lowers the environmental impact.
  • Improved Shelf Life and Quality: Genetic engineering can create produce with a longer shelf life, reducing food waste and making transportation more efficient. An example is non-browning apples.

Concerns and Potential Risks Addressed by Science

While the consensus supports safety, some concerns have been raised by critics. Scientists and regulatory bodies have investigated these potential risks thoroughly.

  • Allergenicity: There is a theoretical risk that new proteins introduced by genetic engineering could trigger allergic reactions. However, developers must test for potential allergens, and if an allergen is transferred (as happened with Brazil nut genes in a test soybean), the product is not commercialized.
  • Herbicide Exposure: The widespread use of herbicide-tolerant crops has led to increased herbicide application in some cases, raising concerns about potential health effects from residue. However, the use of insect-resistant crops has decreased the use of more toxic insecticides.
  • Gene Transfer: The possibility of transferred genes moving to gut bacteria or human cells is a concern, especially involving antibiotic resistance genes used in some early development. However, the probability is considered low, and the WHO discourages using antibiotic resistance genes.

Bio-Engineered vs. Organic: A Comparison

To make informed choices, it helps to understand the key differences and overlaps between bio-engineered and organic foods. A table highlights the distinctions in their production methods and labeling.

Feature Bio-Engineered Foods USDA Certified Organic Foods
Genetic Modification Contains detectable genetic material modified in a lab using techniques not possible in nature. Prohibited. Must be produced without genetic engineering.
Pesticide Use Varies widely. Some are engineered for resistance, reducing use of specific pesticides (like insecticides). Others are tolerant to certain herbicides, increasing use of those herbicides. Prohibited from using synthetic herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers. Farmers must use approved natural alternatives.
Labeling Mandatory disclosure with a 'Bioengineered' label, QR code, or website link for most products in the U.S. (since Jan 2022). Mandatory label with the USDA Organic seal and/or a statement indicating organic certification.
Nutritional Profile Generally considered nutritionally equivalent to conventional counterparts, though some may be enhanced with vitamins or minerals. Varied, dependent on soil health and agricultural practices. Some studies suggest higher nutrient density, but findings are often debated.
Third-Party Verification Non-GMO Project Verified offers additional third-party verification for non-GMO claims, including testing. USDA certification involves third-party inspection to ensure compliance with organic standards.

Understanding the USDA Bioengineered Label

The National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard took effect in the U.S. on January 1, 2022. This law requires food manufacturers to disclose bioengineered ingredients on their product labels. This disclosure can be via text, a circular symbol, a QR code, or a web address. It is not a safety warning but a transparency measure. It is important to note that the rule has some exemptions, such as for products with insignificant amounts of bioengineered material and for meat, poultry, and eggs. Organic foods are also exempt because they cannot be bioengineered by law.

Conclusion: Making an Informed Choice

Based on decades of research and the rigorous assessment by regulatory bodies worldwide, the overwhelming scientific consensus is that currently available bio-engineered foods are safe to eat. Concerns about potential long-term effects, allergenicity, and environmental impacts have been investigated, with no verifiable scientific evidence showing bio-engineered foods to be less safe than their traditional counterparts. The ultimate decision of whether to consume bio-engineered foods is a personal one. Consumers can look for specific labels, such as the USDA Organic seal or the Bioengineered label, to inform their purchasing decisions. For more information on the FDA's position, visit their Feed Your Mind website.

How Can You Be Confident in Your Food Choices?

Read Labels Carefully

The presence of the 'Bioengineered' label, QR code, or a web link indicates that the product contains bio-engineered ingredients, offering transparency for your purchasing decision.

Seek Third-Party Verification

To be certain a product is free of GMOs, look for the USDA Organic seal or the Non-GMO Project Verified label. The Non-GMO Project requires testing for high-risk ingredients.

Understand the Regulatory Process

Recognize that bio-engineered foods on the market have undergone a lengthy and comprehensive safety review process involving agencies like the FDA, USDA, and EPA.

Consider the Broader Context

Bio-engineering contributes to a more stable food supply, can enhance nutritional content, and may reduce reliance on some pesticides, offering benefits that extend beyond individual health concerns.

Look for Ongoing Research Updates

The fields of food science and biotechnology are continuously evolving. Staying informed by consulting reliable sources like the FDA and WHO is key to understanding new developments.

Frequently Asked Questions

The term 'genetically modified organism' (GMO) is a broad term for any organism whose genetic material has been altered. 'Bio-engineered food' is the specific term used by the USDA in the U.S. for foods that contain detectable modified genetic material, and for which mandatory labeling is now required.

There is no evidence to suggest that bio-engineered foods cause new allergies. When new proteins are introduced, scientists specifically test for potential allergenicity, and if a risk is identified, the product is not brought to market.

Scientific studies generally show that bio-engineered foods are nutritionally equivalent to or, in some cases, even more nutritious than their conventional counterparts. Bio-engineering can be used to specifically enhance nutrient profiles.

In the United States, look for the 'Bioengineered' label, which may appear as a text statement, a circular symbol, a QR code, or a web address. Products certified organic by the USDA are not bio-engineered.

Since the introduction of bio-engineered crops in the 1990s, extensive research and reviews have been conducted. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and Health Canada have found no verifiable scientific evidence of negative long-term health effects compared to conventional foods.

No, the American Cancer Society states there is no evidence that currently available bio-engineered foods increase or reduce the risk of cancer. Changes in cancer rates over time do not coincide with the introduction of GMOs.

No, there is no connection between a food being bio-engineered and having more antibiotic or steroid residue than its non-bio-engineered counterpart. Although antibiotic resistance marker genes were used in early development, their use is discouraged today, and the probability of transfer is low.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.