Skip to content

Is Lifesavers Healthy? Unpacking the Truth About Your Favorite Candy

4 min read

According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), certain types of Lifesavers are classified as an "unhealthy ultra-processed food" due to high sugar and artificial additive content. This raises the critical question for many consumers: is Lifesavers healthy, or should it be relegated to the realm of occasional treats?

Quick Summary

This article examines the nutritional profile of Lifesavers hard candies and gummies, detailing their high sugar content, artificial ingredients, and lack of nutritional value. We break down the health implications, including effects on dental health and the role of added sugars, while comparing them to genuinely healthier snack alternatives.

Key Points

  • High Sugar Content: Lifesavers candies are mainly sugar and corn syrup, contributing to excessive added sugar consumption.

  • Dental Health Hazard: The hard candies are especially bad for teeth, as they bathe them in sugar for prolonged periods, increasing cavity risk.

  • No Nutritional Value: Lifesavers offer empty calories with no meaningful vitamins, minerals, or fiber.

  • Contains Artificial Ingredients: Many versions include artificial colors and flavors, which are considered synthetic additives.

  • Classified as Ultra-Processed: The Environmental Working Group has identified some Lifesavers products as unhealthy ultra-processed foods.

  • Risk of Metabolic Issues: High intake of processed sugars can lead to a greater risk of heart disease, obesity, and diabetes.

  • Enjoy as an Occasional Treat: Due to their poor nutritional profile, Lifesavers should not be a dietary staple and should only be consumed rarely.

In This Article

The Nutritional Breakdown of Lifesavers

When you look at the ingredients for Lifesavers, particularly the classic hard candies or the more modern gummies, you'll find a few consistent themes: lots of sugar and corn syrup, and very little else of nutritional value. While different varieties exist, the core nutritional picture remains largely the same. For instance, a single Wint-O-Green mint has about 15 calories, all from carbohydrates, with 3 grams of sugar. A serving of Five Flavor hard candies can contain even more added sugar. Lifesavers gummies, in particular, are often flagged for their extremely high sugar content, sometimes containing over 60% sugar by weight.

  • Hard Candies: The core ingredients are typically sugar and corn syrup, with natural and artificial flavors and colors.
  • Gummies: These feature a more complex ingredient list, including corn syrup, sugar, water, modified corn starch, and gelatin, plus more artificial flavors and colors.
  • Mint Candies: While appearing simpler, mint varieties still rely on sugar and corn syrup as their primary ingredients, with specific flavoring and processing aids.

Artificial Ingredients and Their Role

Beyond the sugar, Lifesavers often contain artificial ingredients that are of concern to many health-conscious consumers. These include various artificial colors (like Red 40, Yellow 5, and Blue 1), and artificial flavors. Artificial dyes, particularly Red 40, have been the subject of scrutiny, with some studies suggesting potential links to hyperactivity and behavioral issues in children. The presence of these synthetic additives contributes to Lifesavers' classification as an ultra-processed food.

The Health Risks of Eating Lifesavers

Eating candy like Lifesavers, especially in excess, poses several health risks, primarily related to its sugar content and ingredients. Here are some of the key health considerations:

Dental Health Deterioration

Lifesavers, particularly the hard candy versions, are notably bad for dental health. The combination of high sugar and the prolonged sucking time allows sugar to sit on your teeth for extended periods. This feeds the bacteria in your mouth, which then produce acids that erode tooth enamel and lead to cavities. This is compounded by the fact that the hard candies can also pose a risk of cracking or damaging teeth.

High Sugar Intake and Metabolic Impact

Consistent consumption of high-sugar products like Lifesavers contributes significantly to your daily added sugar intake. High sugar consumption is linked to a higher risk of serious health problems, including heart disease, obesity, and Type 2 diabetes. Overindulging can also lead to energy crashes and mood swings due to spikes and drops in blood sugar levels.

Minimal to No Nutritional Value

Lifesavers are what many would consider "empty calories." They provide energy but offer virtually no vitamins, minerals, protein, or dietary fiber. This means they fill you up without providing the essential nutrients your body needs to function properly.

The Ultra-Processed Food Factor

Experts at the EWG have classified some Lifesavers products as an "unhealthy ultra-processed food". These types of foods are often high in added sugar, unhealthy fats, and sodium, and have been linked to a variety of negative health outcomes.

A Comparison: Lifesavers vs. Healthy Alternatives

To better understand the health implications, let's compare Lifesavers to some genuinely healthy snack options.

Feature Lifesavers Candy Healthy Snack (e.g., Apple slices)
Primary Ingredients Sugar, Corn Syrup, Artificial Colors Whole Fruit (Fiber, Vitamins, Minerals)
Nutritional Value Minimal to None High (Vitamins, Fiber, Antioxidants)
Added Sugar Very High None (Natural Sugars Only)
Effect on Teeth Detrimental (Cavity Risk) Beneficial (Natural "brushing" action)
Energy Release Rapid spike and crash Steady, sustained energy
Overall Health Impact Negative (Ultra-processed) Positive (Nutrient-dense)

Making Healthier Snack Choices

For those seeking to reduce their sugar intake and choose more nutritious options, there are many alternatives to Lifesavers. These can satisfy a sweet craving while providing real health benefits:

  • Fresh Fruit: Enjoying fresh fruits like berries, apples, or pears can satisfy a sweet tooth with natural sugars, fiber, and essential vitamins.
  • Dark Chocolate: A small portion of dark chocolate (70% or higher) can provide a rich flavor with a much lower sugar content and potential antioxidant benefits.
  • Homemade Fruit Leather: You can make your own fruit leather with minimal ingredients, controlling the amount of added sugar.
  • Sugar-Free Hard Candies: Some brands, like Dr. John's, offer sugar-free hard candies that are fortified with fiber and Vitamin C, though moderation is still key.
  • Greek Yogurt: Pairing plain Greek yogurt with cinnamon or a drizzle of honey offers protein and probiotics without excessive sugar.

Conclusion: The Verdict on Lifesavers' Healthiness

In summary, the answer to the question "is Lifesavers healthy?" is a clear no. While a classic candy enjoyed by many, it is, at its core, a processed product loaded with sugar and artificial ingredients, offering no nutritional benefits. The health risks, particularly concerning dental health and the negative metabolic effects of high sugar intake, are well-documented. Enjoying Lifesavers in strict moderation as a treat is the most responsible approach. For regular snacking, opting for whole, unprocessed foods or one of the many healthier candy alternatives available is the best choice for your overall well-being.

Lifesavers and Your Health: Key Takeaways

  • High Sugar Content: Both hard candies and gummies are primarily made of sugar and corn syrup, leading to high added sugar intake.
  • Dental Risk: The combination of sugar and long dissolve time makes hard Lifesavers particularly damaging to teeth, increasing the risk of cavities.
  • Artificial Additives: Many varieties contain artificial colors (like Red 40) and flavors, which have raised health and behavioral concerns in some studies.
  • Ultra-Processed: Food safety organizations classify Lifesavers as an unhealthy ultra-processed food due to its high sugar and synthetic ingredients.
  • Nutritionally Empty: Lifesavers provide no significant vitamins, minerals, protein, or fiber, offering only "empty calories".
  • Moderation is Essential: Lifesavers are best enjoyed as an occasional treat rather than a regular part of your diet.
  • Healthier Alternatives Exist: Better options for satisfying a sweet craving include fresh fruit, dark chocolate, or specific sugar-free candies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Lifesavers are considered unhealthy primarily due to their high content of added sugars, such as corn syrup and sugar, and their use of artificial flavors and colors. They offer no significant nutritional value, providing only empty calories.

Yes, Lifesavers are particularly bad for your teeth. The hard candy versions expose your teeth to sugar for a long time, feeding bacteria that produce enamel-eroding acid. Additionally, biting down on hard candy can cause dental damage like cracked teeth.

No, Lifesavers provide no discernible health benefits. They lack vitamins, minerals, protein, and fiber, and are not a source of nutrition. Any perceived benefit, such as a sore throat relief from a mint, is temporary and anecdotal.

Lifesavers Gummies are not healthier than the hard candies. While the texture differs, they are still a highly processed food, often with an equally high or higher sugar content and various artificial ingredients, including dyes like Red 40, Yellow 5, and Blue 1.

An ultra-processed food is an industrial formulation of substances derived from foods but containing little to no whole food content, often with additives. Lifesavers fit this description due to their high reliance on refined sugars, syrups, and artificial additives rather than whole food sources.

Healthier alternatives include fresh fruit for natural sweetness, a small portion of dark chocolate for antioxidants, or sugar-free hard candies from brands focusing on better ingredients. Whole foods are always the best option.

Yes, excessive consumption of Lifesavers and other high-sugar candies can contribute to serious health problems. These include an increased risk of heart disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and significant damage to dental health.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.