Skip to content

Is Tuna or Salmon Safer? A Deep Dive into Mercury and Nutrition

4 min read

Almost all fish have trace amounts of mercury; however, studies show that salmon generally has significantly lower levels than most tuna varieties. This raises a key question: is tuna or salmon safer, and how does the mercury risk compare with other nutritional benefits?

Quick Summary

Compare the safety of tuna versus salmon. Focus on mercury levels and nutrient density to help with healthier seafood choices.

Key Points

  • Salmon is Generally Safer: Salmon has consistently lower mercury levels than tuna, making it a safer option for more frequent consumption, especially for sensitive groups.

  • Tuna Mercury Levels Depend on Species: The mercury risk in tuna varies greatly; canned light tuna (skipjack) is low, while fresh albacore or large yellowfin and bigeye tuna have higher levels.

  • Salmon is an Omega-3 Powerhouse: For heart and brain health, salmon is the superior source of beneficial omega-3 fatty acids, containing significantly more than most tuna.

  • Tuna Provides More Lean Protein: If your primary goal is high-protein, low-fat content, tuna is an excellent and affordable source, particularly canned light tuna.

  • Consider Canned Options Wisely: Canned light tuna is a safe and accessible choice, but canned salmon offers a higher omega-3 and calcium boost.

  • Variety is Key: Experts recommend incorporating a mix of fish into your diet to gain a wider range of nutrients while managing overall contaminant exposure.

In This Article

Mercury Contamination: The Primary Safety Factor

When evaluating seafood safety, mercury content is a key consideration. Methylmercury is a neurotoxin that builds up in fish tissue, and levels tend to increase as you move up the food chain. Since tuna are larger, longer-living predators, they typically contain higher mercury concentrations than salmon. However, the level of risk depends heavily on the specific species and preparation method.

Mercury Levels in Tuna Varieties

Tuna mercury levels vary widely depending on the species. Larger, more predatory tuna accumulate the highest concentrations. The FDA and EPA provide guidance on consumption based on these levels.

  • Highest Mercury (Limit or Avoid): Bigeye and certain fresh/frozen yellowfin tuna can have high mercury levels and should be limited, especially for pregnant women and young children.
  • Lower Mercury (Moderate Consumption): Albacore (white) tuna has higher mercury than light tuna and is recommended to be limited to one serving per week for sensitive populations.
  • Lowest Mercury (Best Choice): Canned light tuna (typically skipjack) is caught young and contains much lower mercury, making it a frequent recommendation for regular consumption.

Salmon's Consistently Low Mercury Profile

In contrast to tuna, salmon has a consistently low mercury profile. This is largely because they are smaller fish lower on the food chain. For most people, this makes salmon a very safe choice for regular consumption, with the FDA categorizing it as a "best choice" to be eaten two to three times per week. Wild-caught salmon is particularly known for its low mercury content.

Nutritional Comparison: Beyond Safety

Beyond mercury, both fish offer a wealth of health benefits. They are excellent sources of high-quality protein and contain different profiles of other essential nutrients.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids

Salmon is a standout for its high omega-3 fatty acid content, particularly EPA and DHA, which are crucial for brain health, heart health, and reducing inflammation. A 3-ounce serving of wild-caught salmon can have around 1,500 mg of omega-3s. While tuna also contains omega-3s, the quantity is significantly lower, often less than a third of what is found in salmon.

Protein Content

Tuna is often the winner when it comes to lean protein. Because it's a leaner fish, a 3-ounce serving can pack more protein than a similar serving of salmon. This makes tuna an excellent choice for those seeking high protein without the added fat and calories.

Vitamins and Minerals

  • Salmon: An excellent source of Vitamin D and Vitamin B12. Vitamin D is essential for calcium absorption and bone health, while B12 supports nerve function and DNA synthesis.
  • Tuna: Rich in selenium and niacin (Vitamin B3). Selenium is a powerful antioxidant, and niacin helps convert food into energy.

Tuna vs. Salmon: A Nutrient Snapshot

Feature Salmon (Wild) Tuna (Light, Canned)
Mercury Content Very Low Low (Higher in Albacore/Fresh)
Omega-3s (per 3oz) High (~1.5g) Moderate (~0.3-0.5g)
Protein (per 3oz) Moderate (~22g) High (~25g)
Vitamin D Higher Lower
Vitamin B12 Higher Higher
Selenium High Very High
Calories (per 3oz) Higher (~170) Lower (~100-120)

What About Canned Fish?

Canned fish is a convenient, accessible, and affordable way to include seafood in your diet. Both canned tuna and canned salmon offer great nutrition, but the same safety principles apply. Canned light tuna (typically skipjack) is considered a "best choice" due to its low mercury content, while albacore (white) canned tuna should be consumed more sparingly. Canned salmon is consistently low in mercury and often contains soft, edible bones, which provide a significant source of calcium.

Who Should Be Most Cautious?

Certain populations need to be more mindful of mercury consumption. Pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and young children should prioritize low-mercury fish to support healthy brain and nervous system development. For these individuals, salmon is a preferred option, and canned light tuna can be included in moderation (2-3 servings per week), but higher-mercury albacore and bigeye tuna should be limited or avoided altogether.

Conclusion: A Balanced Perspective

Deciding if tuna or salmon is safer for you depends on what you prioritize. If minimizing mercury exposure is your main goal, salmon is the clear winner. It offers high levels of heart-healthy omega-3s, vitamin D, and B12 with very low mercury risk. However, if you are seeking a leaner, more protein-dense option, canned light tuna is a safe and affordable choice. Health experts recommend incorporating a variety of fish into your diet to reap the benefits of each while keeping mercury exposure in check. For the most authoritative advice on seafood consumption, consult the official guidelines from the Food and Drug Administration.(https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/mercury-levels-commercial-fish-and-shellfish-1990-2012).

Key Takeaways for Your Health

  • Prioritize Low-Mercury Options: Salmon, particularly wild-caught, and canned light (skipjack) tuna are considered low-mercury "best choices" for regular eating.
  • Balance Mercury and Nutrition: While tuna contains more mercury overall, its higher protein content makes canned light tuna a valuable, affordable option.
  • Boost Omega-3s with Salmon: For maximum omega-3 intake, salmon is the superior choice, providing significant benefits for heart and brain health.
  • Choose Canned Light for Convenience: Canned light tuna offers a convenient and low-mercury protein source, though canned salmon provides more omega-3s and sometimes extra calcium.
  • Vary Your Fish Intake: Eating a mix of different fish species is the best way to gain a wide range of nutrients while limiting exposure to any single contaminant.
  • Be Mindful of Species: Different types of tuna have significantly different mercury levels; larger, longer-lived species carry more risk.
  • Consider Needs for Sensitive Groups: Pregnant women and young children should favor low-mercury fish like salmon and canned light tuna due to developmental concerns.

Frequently Asked Questions

Salmon generally has much lower mercury levels than tuna. The mercury in tuna varies by species and size, with larger tuna (like bigeye) having more mercury than smaller types used in canned light tuna.

Yes, canned salmon is consistently a safer choice due to its lower mercury content. While canned light tuna is a low-mercury option, canned albacore tuna has higher mercury levels and should be limited.

Salmon is a significantly better source of omega-3 fatty acids. A serving of wild-caught salmon can contain more than three times the omega-3s of most tuna varieties.

Canned light tuna, made from smaller skipjack tuna, is the safest type to eat regularly due to its low mercury content. The FDA considers it a 'best choice'.

Pregnant women should prioritize low-mercury fish like salmon. They can also eat canned light tuna in moderation, but should limit or avoid higher-mercury types like albacore and bigeye tuna.

The FDA recommends eating salmon 2-3 times per week. For tuna, the recommendation depends on the type; canned light tuna can be consumed 2-3 times per week, while albacore should be limited to once per week.

Wild salmon is often cited as a safer option due to potentially lower contaminant levels compared to farmed salmon, though mercury levels are low in both. Wild salmon also tends to have a more favorable omega-3 profile.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.