Skip to content

Understanding Artificial Fats: What is the name of the artificial fat?

4 min read

Back in the mid-1990s, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a zero-calorie, synthetic fat for use in snack foods. This additive sparked significant health controversy and public discussion regarding diet and nutrition. To answer the key question, what is the name of the artificial fat? it is Olestra, also known by its brand name, Olean.

Quick Summary

Olestra (Olean) is a lipid-based fat substitute that is not absorbed by the body. Once used in diet snack foods, its history is marked by controversial health reports, leading to its decline in the market.

Key Points

  • Olestra is the artificial fat: Olestra, also known by its brand name Olean, is a synthetic, zero-calorie fat substitute made from sucrose polyester.

  • Not digestible or absorbed: Due to its large molecular size, olestra is not broken down by the body's enzymes and passes through the digestive system unabsorbed, contributing no calories.

  • Caused gastrointestinal side effects: Early products containing olestra required warning labels due to reports of abdominal cramping, bloating, and loose stools.

  • Blocked vitamin absorption: Olestra inhibited the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K), necessitating the fortification of products containing it.

  • Declined in the marketplace: Following health concerns and a significant drop in sales, olestra was largely phased out of the U.S. food supply and replaced by other fat substitutes.

  • Trans fat is also artificial fat: Industrially produced trans fats (partially hydrogenated oils), different from olestra, were banned due to serious heart health risks.

In This Article

What is Olestra (Olean)?

Olestra, more commonly known by its brand name Olean, is a synthetic fat developed by Procter & Gamble. Chemically, it is a sucrose polyester, meaning it is created by bonding sucrose (table sugar) with six to eight long-chain fatty acid molecules. This large, radial molecular structure is the key to its function and controversy. The human body's digestive enzymes cannot break down the olestra molecule. As a result, it passes through the digestive tract undigested and unabsorbed, providing zero calories.

The Rise and Fall of the Artificial Fat

Olestra was first approved by the FDA in 1996 for use as a fat replacement in savory snacks like potato chips and crackers. It was marketed as a way for consumers to enjoy fatty, satisfying snack foods without the caloric consequences. However, this early adoption was met with significant backlash due to reported side effects. The FDA approval came with a requirement for a label statement warning consumers of potential gastrointestinal issues, including abdominal cramping, bloating, and loose stools. Products containing olestra also had to be fortified with fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K) because the substance was found to interfere with their absorption.

Despite heavy marketing and initial high sales, public concern and negative health reports contributed to a sharp decline in popularity. By the early 2000s, sales had plummeted, and the manufacturer abandoned attempts to expand its use. In 2003, the FDA removed the mandatory warning label, but by then, the reputation of the ingredient was largely damaged, and most products containing it had been discontinued in the United States.

The Health Implications of Artificial Fats

While olestra is the most well-known artificial fat in the American market's history, the term also often brings to mind trans fats. Trans fats, or partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), are another industrially produced type of fat created through a process called hydrogenation. Unlike olestra, trans fats are absorbed by the body, and their health consequences are far more severe and well-documented. Consuming trans fats increases harmful LDL cholesterol while decreasing beneficial HDL cholesterol, significantly raising the risk of heart disease and stroke. This stark contrast highlights the different approaches and outcomes for different types of artificial or modified fats.

Comparing Olestra with Other Fat Replacers

Modern dietary trends and scientific understanding have moved away from controversial artificial fats like olestra and harmful trans fats toward safer and more naturally derived fat replacers. These alternatives aim to provide the functional properties of fat without the associated calories or health risks. They are categorized based on their source: carbohydrate-based, protein-based, and lipid-based.

Feature Olestra (Olean) Trans Fats (PHOs) Modern Fat Replacers
Source Synthetic sucrose polyester Industrially produced via hydrogenation of vegetable oils Carbohydrate-based (e.g., starches, gums), protein-based (e.g., whey, egg white), or lipid-based (e.g., certain emulsifiers)
Caloric Value 0 kcal/g (non-digestible) 9 kcal/g (like regular fat) Varies, often reduced (1-4 kcal/g), or non-caloric
Digestion Passes through the body unabsorbed Fully absorbed and metabolized Varies based on composition, some are fully digested, others are partially or not absorbed
Main Health Risk Gastrointestinal issues, inhibited fat-soluble vitamin absorption Increased LDL cholesterol, decreased HDL cholesterol, heart disease, stroke Generally considered safer, but some can have laxative effects at high intake (e.g., polydextrose)
Current Status (U.S.) Discontinued in most products Largely banned from use in foods Widely used in many low-fat and fat-free products

Modern Approaches to a Healthy Diet

The market’s rejection of olestra and the regulatory bans on trans fats highlight a broader shift in our understanding of diet and nutrition. The focus has moved from simply removing fat to incorporating healthier, functional alternatives. The goal now is not just reducing calories but also improving the nutritional profile of foods without significant side effects.

This is seen in the proliferation of naturally derived fat replacers. For example:

  • Carbohydrate-based: Many fibers and starches from plants, grains, and legumes can be used to mimic the texture of fat while adding bulk and water retention. Examples include maltodextrin, pectin, and cellulose.
  • Protein-based: Microparticulated proteins from milk or egg whites, like Simplesse, can create a smooth, creamy texture in low-fat dairy products and sauces.
  • Lipid-based: While olestra is an example, newer lipid-based replacers are being developed that offer reduced calories without the absorption issues. These might involve altering the chemical structure of fats to be less efficiently absorbed.

As consumers, our best defense against potentially harmful additives is an informed, balanced dietary approach. Rather than relying on a magic ingredient to make unhealthy snacks "diet-friendly," a focus on whole, minimally processed foods remains the most reliable strategy for good nutrition. The lesson from the rise and fall of artificial fats is clear: the pursuit of low-calorie alternatives should not come at the expense of digestive health or nutrient absorption.

Conclusion

While the search for a zero-calorie, guilt-free version of fat gave rise to products like Olestra (Olean) in the late 20th century, its story serves as a cautionary tale within the diet and nutrition industry. Its name is synonymous with the promise and pitfalls of artificial fats, from potential weight management benefits to serious gastrointestinal side effects and inhibited vitamin absorption. Today's market for low-fat products is populated by a new generation of fat replacers—often derived from carbohydrates or proteins—which prioritize replicating texture and mouthfeel with fewer calories and less controversy. The best nutrition diet strategy involves moderation and a focus on whole foods, rather than depending on a synthetic shortcut to wellness.

Harvard Health Publishing's guide on the truth about fats offers comprehensive information on healthy and unhealthy fats.

Frequently Asked Questions

Olestra is a non-caloric, non-digestible fat substitute, whereas industrial trans fats are absorbed and metabolized by the body but are structurally altered. Trans fats raise bad cholesterol and lower good cholesterol, unlike olestra, which was mainly associated with gastrointestinal issues and nutrient interference.

Olestra was developed by Procter & Gamble as a way to create snack foods with the taste and texture of high-fat products but with fewer or zero calories, catering to the growing low-fat diet trend in the 1990s.

Since olestra inhibited the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K), the FDA required manufacturers to compensate by adding extra amounts of these vitamins back into olestra-containing products.

In the United States, most products that once contained olestra, such as 'WOW!' and 'Pringles Light' chips, were discontinued or reformulated. While some niche or foreign products might exist, it is no longer a prevalent ingredient in the U.S. food supply.

Modern food science uses fat replacers derived from carbohydrates (like starches and gums), proteins (like whey and egg white), and modified lipids. These are often used to improve texture and reduce calories without the side effects associated with olestra or trans fats.

Olestra is not toxic, but it can cause uncomfortable gastrointestinal side effects like cramping and loose stools. It also interferes with the absorption of important fat-soluble vitamins. Most people can avoid these effects by limiting consumption.

To avoid artificial fats like olestra, check ingredient labels for "olestra" or its brand name, Olean. For industrial trans fats, look for "partially hydrogenated oil." Choosing whole, unprocessed foods is the most reliable way to avoid these additives.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.