What are three disadvantages of the blood type diet?

December 21, 2025 •

3 min read

According to a 2013 systematic review published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, no reliable evidence exists to support the claimed health benefits of the blood type diet. Despite its popularity, what are three disadvantages of the blood type diet that individuals should be aware of before adopting this restrictive eating plan?

Quick Summary

The blood type diet's three primary disadvantages are its lack of scientific validation, the risk of unnecessary dietary restrictions leading to nutrient deficiencies, and the high cost and difficulty of long-term adherence.

Key Points

No Scientific Evidence: There is no credible scientific research to prove that eating according to your blood type provides any specific health benefits.
Nutrient Deficiencies: The diet's restrictive nature often requires the unnecessary elimination of healthy food groups, potentially leading to deficiencies in essential vitamins and minerals.
High Cost: The emphasis on organic foods and proprietary supplements can make the blood type diet more expensive than other dietary approaches.
Low Adherence: Due to its strict limitations and practical difficulties, the diet is often hard to follow consistently over the long term.
Placebo Effect: Any positive outcomes, such as weight loss or increased energy, are more likely caused by the overall reduction of processed foods rather than following blood type-specific rules.

Disadvantage #1: A Lack of Scientific and Clinical Evidence

Perhaps the most significant disadvantage of the blood type diet is the overwhelming consensus among the scientific and medical communities that it lacks evidentiary support. Popularized by naturopathic physician Dr. Peter D'Adamo, the diet's theory is based on the idea that food-based proteins called lectins react differently with each blood type. However, this concept has been widely discredited.

A comprehensive 2013 review found no evidence to validate the purported health benefits.
A 2014 study observed health improvements in participants on blood type diets, but these benefits were independent of their specific blood type, suggesting they resulted from generally healthier eating rather than blood type adherence.
Many experts consider the blood type diet pseudoscience, lacking credible scientific backing.

Scientific vs. Theoretical Claims of the Blood Type Diet


Feature	Blood Type Diet Claim	Scientific Consensus	Key Evidence
Foundation	Diet should be based on evolutionary heritage and lectin compatibility specific to blood type.	No evidence supports a link between blood type and optimal diet, and lectin claims are largely unproven.	2013 systematic review found no studies demonstrating benefit from a blood type diet.
Health Outcomes	Following the specific diet plan leads to better health and weight management based on blood type.	Any observed health improvements are likely due to generally healthier eating patterns (more whole foods, less processed food), not blood type.	2014 study showed health improvements were independent of blood type adherence.
Digestion	Eating incompatible lectins causes blood cell clumping and digestive issues.	Most lectins that cause clumping affect all blood types, and cooking typically destroys them.	Research indicates no proven connection between blood type and digestion.

Disadvantage #2: Restrictive Nature and Risk of Nutrient Deficiencies

The blood type diet's requirement to severely restrict or eliminate entire food groups is a significant concern for balanced nutrition and can lead to nutrient deficiencies. Restrictions vary by blood type, potentially leading to issues such as insufficient calcium intake in the Type O diet (which restricts dairy) or potential deficiencies in vitamin B12 and iron for Type A individuals (who are advised a vegetarian diet). Avoiding foods like nightshades on the Type B diet can also remove valuable sources of vitamins and antioxidants. Cutting out healthy food groups makes achieving a well-rounded nutritional profile difficult and can be detrimental, especially for those with pre-existing conditions.

Disadvantage #3: High Cost and Difficulty of Adherence

The blood type diet is often expensive and logistically challenging, hindering long-term adherence. It recommends pricey organic and specialty foods, along with expensive blood type-specific supplements. Meal planning is inconvenient, particularly for families with different blood types, requiring separate meal preparation that is often impractical. Social situations and dining out become difficult due to rigid rules, making the diet hard to maintain for long. The diet also fails to consider individual health conditions or allergies, offering a rigid, unsubstantiated framework rather than true personalized nutrition.

Conclusion

The blood type diet's premise lacks scientific validation and presents significant disadvantages. Its restrictive nature risks nutritional deficiencies, while the high cost and logistical difficulties make long-term adherence challenging. Any benefits likely stem from eating healthier whole foods, not blood type. For sustainable well-being, evidence-based approaches like the Mediterranean diet are recommended, and consulting a registered dietitian is advisable.

Read more about the lack of evidence supporting the blood type diet in the systematic review published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Note: The Markdown link to the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is not shown in the raw JSON output but would be formatted like [link text](URL).

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the blood type diet is not supported by scientific evidence. A 2013 review of over 1,400 studies found no reliable evidence to validate its health claims.

Yes, its restrictive nature can lead to nutrient deficiencies. For example, the Type O diet restricts dairy, which is a key source of calcium.

Improved health is likely due to the diet's focus on whole, unprocessed foods and avoidance of junk food, a benefit independent of blood type.

Yes, the diet can be expensive. Proponents recommend purchasing organic produce and specific supplements, which adds to the overall cost.

Yes, cooking or soaking most lectin-containing foods, especially legumes, significantly reduces or eliminates their activity. The idea that lectins interact uniquely with blood types is also unproven.

Yes, meal planning can be a significant challenge if family members have different blood types, requiring separate meal preparation and causing practical difficulties.

Healthier alternatives include evidence-based eating patterns like the Mediterranean diet, DASH diet, or simply focusing on a varied diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains.