Skip to content

What were humans supposed to eat naturally?

4 min read

Contrary to the popular image of the 'caveman' as a carnivorous meat-eater, early hominins and their direct predecessors consumed a much more diverse, omnivorous diet. This biological flexibility is a key aspect of human survival, and it raises the compelling question: what were humans supposed to eat naturally?

Quick Summary

Examines the evolutionary history of the human diet, covering the diverse omnivorous intake of hunter-gatherers, the impact of cooking, and the profound changes brought by the agricultural revolution. Explores evidence from fossils and modern research.

Key Points

  • Omnivorous Flexibility: Humans evolved as adaptable omnivores, eating diverse plants and animals based on local availability.

  • Plant-Based Staples: The diet of our ancestors was heavily plant-based, with meat consumption fluctuating seasonally and regionally.

  • The Cooking Revolution: Cooking food increased calorie extraction, enabled brain growth, and reduced chewing time, fundamentally altering our biology.

  • Agricultural Shift: The agricultural revolution increased food security but reduced dietary diversity and introduced new health challenges.

  • Modern Mismatch: Chronic diseases today may stem from a mismatch between our ancient genetic makeup and the modern, processed diet.

  • No Single 'Paleo' Diet: The popular 'Paleo' diet is based on a misconception of a single ancestral diet; ancient diets varied significantly.

  • Whole Foods First: The healthiest approach is to focus on unprocessed whole foods, mirroring the diversity of our ancestors' adaptable eating patterns.

In This Article

The Myth of the 'One' Natural Human Diet

The idea that there is a single, perfect “natural” diet for all humans is a modern misconception. For millennia, humans and our hominin ancestors were defined by their adaptability and dietary flexibility, allowing them to thrive in diverse ecosystems worldwide. The specific diet of a prehistoric human depended almost entirely on their location, climate, and the season, meaning that a "one-size-fits-all" ancestral diet never existed. This is a key finding that complicates the narrative of restrictive modern dietary trends, such as the popular Paleo diet, which often fail to account for the vast diversity of ancient food sources.

Are Humans Carnivores, Herbivores, or Omnivores?

Anatomical, archaeological, and physiological evidence points overwhelmingly to humans being omnivores. We possess the dental structure of generalist feeders, with incisors and canines for biting and tearing, and molars for grinding. Our digestive systems, while not as specialized as strict carnivores or herbivores, are capable of processing both animal protein and a wide variety of plant matter. Furthermore, our physiological need for certain nutrients, like Vitamin B12, which is primarily found in animal products, confirms a long evolutionary history of consuming animal-based foods. The flexibility to eat both plants and meat was a major evolutionary advantage.

The Ancient Hunter-Gatherer's Plate

For nearly 99% of human history, from the Paleolithic era until the dawn of agriculture roughly 12,000 years ago, our ancestors were hunter-gatherers. Their diets were far from monochromatic, instead relying on whatever was seasonally and locally available. The components of this diet varied significantly, but some common themes emerge from archaeological records and studies of modern hunter-gatherer societies:

  • Plants: A huge diversity of plant-based foods, including tubers, roots, nuts, seeds, fruits, berries, and fungi, formed the backbone of many diets. Evidence from microfossils in ancient dental calculus confirms the consumption of wild plants.
  • Animals: Our ancestors hunted various large and small mammals, birds, and foraged eggs. Meat consumption varied, often being a prized but less consistently available food source than plants. Coastal and river communities supplemented their diets with fish and shellfish.
  • Insects: Insects were also a common food source, providing protein and fat.
  • Fatty Acids: The polyunsaturated fatty acid intake was high, with a healthier balance of omega-6 to omega-3 than is typical in modern diets.

The Game-Changing Role of Cooking

One of the most pivotal moments in the evolution of the human diet was the harnessing of fire for cooking, which occurred hundreds of thousands of years before the agricultural revolution. Cooking fundamentally changed our relationship with food:

  1. Increased Energy: Cooking breaks down complex carbohydrates and proteins, making them easier to digest and allowing our bodies to extract significantly more energy from the same amount of food.
  2. Enabled Brain Growth: This surplus energy was crucial for fueling the growth of our large, energy-demanding brains.
  3. Safety and Preservation: Heating food kills harmful pathogens and parasites, making it safer to eat.
  4. Physical Changes: Cooking led to a reduction in tooth and jaw size and a decrease in the size of the intestinal tract, as less energy was needed for digestion.

The Agricultural Revolution: A Double-Edged Fork

Beginning around 12,000 years ago, the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture transformed human society and diet. This shift allowed for a stable, predictable food supply, but it came with significant trade-offs for health.

Comparison: Ancestral Hunter-Gatherer Diet vs. Modern Western Diet

Feature Ancestral Hunter-Gatherer Diet Modern Western Diet
Dietary Diversity High, based on seasonal and local foraging Low, often reliant on a few staple crops (corn, wheat, soy)
Protein Source Lean meat, fish, insects, eggs High intake of processed and fatty meats
Carbohydrates Wild, uncultivated fruits, vegetables, and tubers High in refined grains, added sugars, and processed foods
Fats Predominantly healthy fats from wild animals, fish, nuts, and seeds High in inflammatory omega-6 from refined vegetable oils
Fiber Very high, from diverse plant sources Low, especially with refined grains and low vegetable intake
Nutrient Density High, especially vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients Lower, with more empty calories from processed foods
Inflammation Low, due to diverse anti-inflammatory foods Chronic, due to processed foods, sugar, and unbalanced fats

Modern Diet vs. Ancestral Eating

While we cannot perfectly replicate an ancestral diet, modern dietary science suggests that the principles of variety, whole foods, and minimal processing are beneficial. The shift away from a diet rich in diverse plants, lean proteins, and healthy fats toward a highly processed, high-sugar, and low-fiber Western diet is linked to numerous chronic diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular issues.

This is a classic evolutionary mismatch: our ancient genes struggle to cope with a modern diet they were never designed to process. Instead of asking what our singular “natural” diet is, a more productive question might be: what are the ancestral principles we can apply today? This means focusing on a wide array of whole, unprocessed foods, with a healthy balance of protein, fats, and fiber from diverse sources.

Conclusion: The Flexible Omnivore

Ultimately, there is no single, ideal answer to "what were humans supposed to eat naturally?" The evidence shows that our ancestors were highly adaptable, flexible omnivores who ate a remarkably diverse diet of seasonally and regionally available plants and animals. The invention of cooking was a major evolutionary driver, and the agricultural revolution fundamentally changed our relationship with food, introducing both benefits and drawbacks.

Instead of striving for one particular ancestral diet, a better approach is to learn from the principles of our past: prioritize whole foods, embrace dietary diversity, minimize highly processed options, and stay physically active. This aligns our modern lifestyle more closely with the evolutionary blueprint that helped humanity thrive across the globe.

The Australian Museum provides great insight on early human diet based on fossil analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

The core principle is adaptability and omnivorous flexibility. Humans are biologically suited to consume a wide variety of foods from both plant and animal sources, depending on what is available in their environment.

No, this is a common myth. While meat was a valuable part of the diet, our ancestors were primarily omnivores who ate a large variety of plants, roots, seeds, fruits, and insects, with meat intake varying greatly based on region and season.

Cooking made food easier to digest, increasing the amount of energy and nutrients we could absorb. This enabled the development of our larger brains and led to smaller teeth and guts over time.

The modern Paleo diet is an interpretation, not an exact recreation. There was no single ancestral diet; diets varied widely by region and climate. Additionally, many modern 'Paleo' foods are different from their wild counterparts.

No, not initially. While agriculture provided more reliable food, it reduced dietary diversity and introduced a reliance on a few staple crops, which led to new health problems like nutritional deficiencies and dental issues for early farmers.

The ability to digest grains and dairy developed relatively recently in human history, after the agricultural revolution. Some populations adapted to these foods over time, such as developing lactase persistence, while others did not.

The modern Western diet is high in processed foods, refined sugars, and inflammatory fats, and low in fiber, a stark contrast to the diverse, whole-food diets of our ancestors. This mismatch is linked to an increase in chronic diseases.

Hunter-gatherers ate what was available locally, including a diverse range of foods such as tubers, roots, nuts, fruits, wild berries, lean meat from hunted animals, fish, shellfish, eggs, and insects.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.