Skip to content

Artificial Sweetener: What's Another Name for Artificial Sugar?

5 min read

Over 41% of adults in the United States reported using artificial sweeteners between 2009 and 2012, highlighting their widespread use. Beyond just artificial sweeteners, these products are known by several other technical and consumer-friendly names, often found in 'diet' or 'sugar-free' products.

Quick Summary

Several other terms are used to describe artificial sweeteners, such as sugar substitutes, non-nutritive sweeteners, and low-calorie sweeteners. These high-intensity compounds provide sweetness without significant calories, serving as a popular alternative for those aiming to reduce sugar intake or manage health conditions like diabetes.

Key Points

  • Another Name: Artificial sugar is also known as non-nutritive sweeteners, high-intensity sweeteners, or sugar substitutes.

  • Variety of Types: There are multiple types of these sweeteners, including aspartame, sucralose, saccharin, acesulfame potassium, and newer ones like advantame.

  • Potency and Calories: These sweeteners are far sweeter than sugar, requiring only small amounts, and most provide negligible or zero calories.

  • Safety Debates: While regulatory bodies consider them safe in moderation, some studies and organizations express caution regarding their long-term effects on weight, metabolism, and gut health.

  • Individual Consideration: The best sweetener choice depends on individual health status, dietary goals, and personal preferences, with options ranging from synthetic to natural plant-derived extracts.

  • Not all 'Sugar-Free' is Created Equal: Products marketed as 'sugar-free' or 'diet' often contain artificial sweeteners, but their specific properties, like heat stability or aftertaste, differ significantly.

In This Article

Common Names for Artificial Sweeteners

Artificial sweeteners, which are often used in diet products, are known by a variety of names in both scientific and everyday language. These alternative names frequently reflect their characteristics, such as their intense sweetness or lack of caloric content.

  • Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS): This is a technical term used to describe sweeteners that provide little to no calories or nutritional value, despite being intensely sweet.
  • High-intensity sweeteners: This name refers to their potency, as these compounds are often hundreds to thousands of times sweeter than regular table sugar (sucrose).
  • Sugar substitutes: A common and straightforward term, this refers to any substance used in place of traditional sugar to achieve a sweet taste.
  • Sugar replacers: Similar to sugar substitutes, this term is used, for example, by organizations like Action on Sugar, to describe these alternatives.
  • Low-calorie sweeteners: This label emphasizes their contribution to a reduced-calorie diet, which is a primary reason for their use by many consumers.

Types of Artificial Sweeteners and Their Properties

Different artificial sweeteners have unique chemical compositions, which affect their heat stability, aftertaste, and suitable applications. Understanding these differences helps explain why certain sweeteners are used in specific products.

  • Aspartame (Equal, NutraSweet): Made from two amino acids, it provides a clean, sweet taste but breaks down under high heat, making it unsuitable for baking.
  • Sucralose (Splenda): A chlorinated derivative of sucrose, it is exceptionally heat-stable and can be used in baked goods, desserts, and beverages.
  • Saccharin (Sweet'N Low): One of the oldest artificial sweeteners, it is heat-stable but can have a metallic aftertaste, especially at high concentrations.
  • Acesulfame Potassium (Sunett, Sweet One): Often blended with other sweeteners to mask its bitter aftertaste, it is heat-stable and used in beverages and baked goods.
  • Neotame: An analog of aspartame, it is highly potent, heat-stable, and used exclusively in food production rather than being sold directly to consumers.
  • Advantame: Another high-potency derivative of aspartame, it is also heat-stable and used as a general-purpose sweetener and flavor enhancer.
  • Monk Fruit and Stevia: While often grouped with artificial sweeteners in consumer products, these are actually high-intensity, non-caloric sweeteners derived from natural plant sources.

The History of Artificial Sweetener Discovery

The discovery of many common artificial sweeteners is filled with intriguing anecdotes of accidental breakthroughs by chemists. The search for a new type of compound often led to the surprising discovery of intense sweetness.

  • Saccharin: Discovered accidentally in 1879 by a chemist at Johns Hopkins University who tasted a sweet compound on his hands after working with coal tar derivatives.
  • Cyclamate: A graduate student at the University of Illinois discovered its sweet taste in 1937 while working on a fever-reducing drug and taking a smoke break. The FDA banned it in the US in 1970 due to animal studies linking it to cancer, though it remains approved in many other countries.
  • Aspartame: A chemist accidentally licked his finger while developing an anti-ulcer drug in 1965 and noticed the sweet taste. After a lengthy approval process, it was widely marketed under names like NutraSweet.
  • Sucralose: Discovered in 1976 when a scientist misheard an instruction to "test" a chlorinated sucrose compound, instead tasting it and finding it to be intensely sweet.

Comparison of Common Artificial Sweeteners

Feature Aspartame Saccharin Sucralose Stevia Monk Fruit
Sweetness (relative to sugar) ~200x 200–700x ~600x 200–450x Varies, high intensity
Calories 4 kcal/g (negligible in use) 0 kcal 0 kcal 0 kcal 0 kcal
Heat Stability No (breaks down) Yes (stable) Yes (stable) Yes (stable) Yes (stable)
Common Uses Diet sodas, chewing gum, cold desserts Beverages, canned goods Baked goods, beverages, dairy Beverages, desserts Beverages, desserts
Potential Aftertaste None Yes (metallic) None Yes (licorice-like) None
Source Two amino acids Chemically synthesized Chlorinated sucrose derivative Stevia rebaudiana plant Monk fruit (Luo Han Guo)

Safety and Controversy

Despite being regulated and generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by authorities like the FDA, artificial sweeteners remain a subject of debate. Some studies have linked long-term, high-intensity use to certain health risks, though other research refutes these claims.

  • Weight Management: The role of artificial sweeteners in weight loss is controversial. Some studies suggest they aid weight loss by reducing calorie intake, while others associate their consumption with weight gain. The World Health Organization (WHO) even advises against using them for weight control.
  • Metabolic Effects: There are conflicting studies on the metabolic effects of artificial sweeteners. Some evidence suggests a potential link to impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance, though others show no significant effect.
  • Gut Microbiota: Research suggests that some artificial sweeteners may alter the composition of gut bacteria, potentially leading to metabolic disturbances. However, findings are inconsistent.
  • Cancer: Concerns regarding cancer risk have been extensively studied, particularly following early animal research on saccharin. However, most comprehensive human studies and regulatory assessments have found no established link between approved artificial sweeteners and cancer risk when consumed within acceptable daily intake (ADI) levels.

How to Choose the Right Sweetener

Given the variety and controversies, choosing a sweetener depends on individual health goals and preferences. For most people, consuming sweeteners within recommended limits is considered safe. However, individuals with specific health conditions should consult with a healthcare provider.

  • For baking: Sucralose and some stevia blends are heat-stable and can be used in recipes that require high temperatures.
  • For beverages: Many sweeteners work well in cold or hot drinks. Aspartame is common in diet sodas, while saccharin and sucralose are found in many tabletop packets.
  • For specific conditions: Individuals with phenylketonuria (PKU) must avoid aspartame, while those with gastrointestinal issues might find sugar alcohols problematic. Natural, plant-derived options like stevia and monk fruit are also available.

Conclusion

The term "artificial sugar" encompasses a broader category known by several names, including non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), high-intensity sweeteners, and sugar substitutes. These calorie-free or low-calorie compounds provide a sweet taste and are extensively used in the food industry. While regulatory bodies generally deem them safe within Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) limits, ongoing scientific debate and sometimes conflicting study results surround their long-term health effects, particularly concerning metabolism, gut health, and weight management. Consumers should be informed about the different types of sweeteners and consider their individual health needs when choosing a sugar alternative. Consulting with a healthcare provider can help clarify any specific concerns, especially for vulnerable populations or those with existing health conditions.

For more detailed information on specific artificial sweeteners and their effects, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a good resource.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary difference lies in their origin. Artificial sweeteners are synthetic compounds created in a lab to mimic sugar, while natural sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit are derived from plants.

Most high-intensity artificial sweeteners are calorie-free or provide such minimal calories that they are considered negligible. Aspartame, for instance, contains a small number of calories per gram, but is used in such small amounts that it contributes almost nothing to the total calorie count.

Heat-stable artificial sweeteners suitable for baking include sucralose (Splenda), saccharin, and acesulfame potassium. Aspartame, however, is not heat-stable and breaks down when exposed to high temperatures.

A non-nutritive sweetener is a substance that provides intense sweetness with little to no caloric content or nutritional value. It's a technical term that distinguishes these high-potency sweeteners from traditional caloric sugars.

The link between artificial sweeteners and weight gain is controversial. Some studies suggest a correlation, possibly due to a disruption of the body's sweet-calorie association or effects on gut microbiota. However, other controlled trials have shown they can support weight loss when used to replace sugar-sweetened products.

Unlike regular sugar, artificial sweeteners generally do not cause a significant spike in blood sugar levels, making them a popular choice for individuals with diabetes. Some observational studies show mixed results, but high-quality controlled studies typically find no effect on blood sugar or insulin.

While regulatory bodies deem approved sweeteners safe for the general population within acceptable daily intake (ADI) limits, some individuals should exercise caution. For example, those with phenylketonuria (PKU) must avoid aspartame, and vulnerable populations like pregnant women or young children might be advised to limit intake.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.