Skip to content

What's better, pasteurized or unpasteurized milk?

3 min read

According to the CDC, from 1998 through 2018, there were 202 illness outbreaks linked to drinking raw milk, causing 2,645 illnesses and 228 hospitalizations. This stark statistic highlights the primary difference between raw and processed milk: safety.

Quick Summary

A direct comparison of raw and pasteurized milk from official sources like the CDC and FDA. This overview details the health risks of unpasteurized milk versus the proven safety and comparable nutritional value of pasteurized options.

Key Points

  • Safety First: Pasteurization is a critical public health measure that eliminates dangerous pathogens like E. coli and Salmonella found in raw milk.

  • Minimal Nutritional Loss: Research consistently shows no significant nutritional difference between raw and pasteurized milk; major nutrients like protein and calcium are unaffected by heat treatment.

  • Significant Health Risks: Raw milk can harbor germs that cause severe, life-threatening illnesses, especially in children, the elderly, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals.

  • Myth Busting: Claims that raw milk cures lactose intolerance or allergies are not supported by scientific evidence.

  • Expert Consensus: Health organizations including the CDC, FDA, and the American Academy of Pediatrics universally recommend choosing pasteurized milk and dairy products.

  • Improved Shelf Life: The pasteurization process helps milk stay fresher for a longer period of time compared to raw milk.

In This Article

The debate surrounding pasteurized versus unpasteurized (raw) milk is a long-standing one, often fueled by a desire for natural, less processed foods. However, the scientific and public health consensus is clear: pasteurization is a vital food safety measure that significantly reduces the risk of serious, even life-threatening, illnesses without meaningfully compromising nutritional quality.

The Dangers of Unpasteurized Milk

Raw milk comes directly from animals and has not undergone the heating process designed to kill harmful germs. Even milk from healthy, clean animals can be contaminated with dangerous bacteria, as pathogens can be shed in feces and contaminate the milk during the milking process. Common pathogens found in raw milk include:

  • Salmonella
  • E. coli (specifically Shiga toxin-producing E. coli which can cause kidney failure)
  • Listeria monocytogenes (which can cause miscarriage or newborn death)
  • Campylobacter
  • Cryptosporidium
  • Brucella

Symptoms of a foodborne illness can range from diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain to severe complications like Guillain-Barré syndrome (paralysis) or hemolytic uremic syndrome (kidney failure), which can be fatal. Vulnerable populations, including young children, the elderly, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems, are at a much higher risk of severe illness.

The Benefits of Pasteurization

Pasteurization, a process developed by Louis Pasteur in the 1800s, involves heating milk to a specific temperature for a set time (e.g., 161°F for 15 seconds) to eliminate disease-causing pathogens. This process has been a cornerstone of public health for over a century, drastically reducing milk-borne illnesses. One out of four foodborne illnesses were related to dairy consumption in the early 1900s; today, it is less than 1%.

Key benefits of pasteurization:

  • Safety: Kills almost all harmful bacteria and viruses, making the milk safe for everyone to consume.
  • Shelf Life: Increases the milk's shelf life compared to raw milk by reducing spoilage-causing bacteria.
  • Nutritional Value: The process has minimal impact on the overall nutritional content of milk, preserving protein, calcium, and fat-soluble vitamins.

Nutritional Comparison: Debunking Myths

A common argument for raw milk is that the heating process destroys beneficial enzymes, proteins, and vitamins. However, scientific evidence indicates these nutritional losses are minimal and insignificant to overall health.

While some vitamins like B1, B6, B9, B12, and C may see minor reductions, these vitamins are not milk's primary dietary contribution, and fortification often makes up for any small loss. Minerals like calcium and phosphorus are heat-stable and remain at similar levels in both raw and pasteurized milk.

Comparison Table: Raw Milk vs. Pasteurized Milk

Feature Pasteurized Milk Unpasteurized (Raw) Milk
Safety Very Low Risk Higher Risk of Harmful Bacteria
Harmful Pathogens Eliminated (e.g., E. coli, Salmonella, Listeria) May contain dangerous pathogens naturally
Nutritional Value Retains vast majority of nutrients, minor vitamin losses Similar to pasteurized milk, with minor differences in certain heat-sensitive components
Shelf Life Longer due to reduced spoilage bacteria Shorter, natural microbes remain active
Lactose Intolerance Contains lactose; no effect on intolerance Contains lactose at similar levels; does not cure intolerance
Allergy Protection No specific protection Some studies suggest a potential inverse association with asthma/allergies (more research needed)

Conclusion: Prioritizing Safety

When evaluating what's better, pasteurized or unpasteurized, the evidence strongly favors pasteurized milk. The potential for severe foodborne illness from raw milk far outweighs any perceived or minor nutritional benefits. While some observational studies suggest raw milk might offer a protective effect against childhood allergies, these findings require further research to determine if the benefits can be retained through safe processing methods. Until then, public health organizations like the CDC and FDA recommend only consuming pasteurized milk and dairy products to ensure your health and safety. The nutritional value is comparable, and the peace of mind is invaluable. For more detailed information on raw milk misconceptions, the FDA provides a comprehensive resource at FDA.gov.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, pasteurization does not significantly reduce milk's nutritional value. Key nutrients like protein and calcium remain largely unchanged. Minor losses in some heat-sensitive vitamins (like Vitamin C and some B vitamins) are considered nutritionally insignificant because milk is not a primary source of these vitamins.

Yes, you can still get sick. Even healthy animals can carry pathogens that contaminate milk, often shed in their feces. Good hygiene practices reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of contamination; pasteurization is the only guaranteed way to remove these harmful germs.

No, raw milk does not cure or treat lactose intolerance. Both raw and pasteurized milk contain similar amounts of lactose, the sugar that people with intolerance struggle to digest. Lactose intolerance is due to insufficient production of the lactase enzyme in the body, not the milk itself.

Unpasteurized milk can contain dangerous bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, Campylobacter, and Brucella. These pathogens can cause severe food poisoning, potentially leading to long-term health complications or death.

Some large-scale observational studies in Europe have found an association between raw milk consumption in a farming environment and lower rates of asthma and allergies in children. However, more research is needed to understand the exact mechanisms, and the potential benefits do not currently outweigh the proven risks of pathogen exposure.

The legality of raw milk sales varies by state. Federal law prohibits the interstate sale of raw milk for human consumption. Some states allow retail sales, others only permit on-farm sales, and some ban it entirely. Legality does not equate to safety.

Anyone can get sick from raw milk, but the risk of severe illness or death is highest for infants and young children, pregnant women, older adults, and individuals with weakened immune systems.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.