Understanding the Source of PFAS in Butter
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a family of synthetic chemicals prized for their resistance to grease, oil, and water. Their application in food packaging, particularly paper and cardboard, is a primary route for contamination. For butter, which is a high-fat product, this risk is particularly pronounced as PFAS can more easily migrate from grease-proof wrappers into the fatty food. Beyond packaging, contamination can also occur through environmental pathways:
- Contaminated Feed and Water: Dairy cows can ingest PFAS from contaminated drinking water or feed grown on land where biosolids (treated sewage sludge containing PFAS) have been used as fertilizer. The chemicals can then accumulate in the cow's system and be passed into its milk, which is used to produce butter.
- Manufacturing Processes: While less common, contamination can also happen during the manufacturing process if equipment is treated with PFAS-containing materials.
Thankfully, with growing consumer awareness and increased regulation, many brands are phasing out these chemicals. As of February 2024, the FDA has worked with the industry to complete a voluntary market phase-out of all remaining grease-proofing agents containing PFAS used in food packaging.
Butter Brands with Low or No PFAS Indicators
To help consumers make informed decisions, organizations like Million Marker, in collaboration with Mamavation, have conducted independent testing on butter wrappers. A study published in 2023 tested 32 wrappers from 22 brands for fluorine, an indicator of PFAS presence. The brands listed below were found to have low or no detectable levels of fluorine in their wrappers, based on this specific study:
- 365 Whole Foods
- Clover Sonoma
- Horizon Organic
- Nature's Promise
- Straus Family
- Trader Joe's
These findings suggest that many manufacturers are moving towards safer, PFAS-free packaging alternatives. However, it is important for consumers to remember that testing results can vary over time and may not be representative of all products from a single brand.
Brands with Detectable PFAS Indicators
In contrast, the same 2023 study found detectable levels of fluorine in the wrappers of other brands. These findings do not necessarily mean the butter itself is contaminated, but rather that there is a potential for leaching from the packaging. Some of the brands with detected fluorine included:
- HEB Organic
- Kate's
- Kerrygold
- Kirkland Signature
- Maple Hill Organic
- Organic Valley
- Wegmans
How to Reduce Your Risk from Butter and Other Foods
For those who want to minimize their exposure to PFAS, there are several proactive steps you can take:
- Choose Non-Paper Packaging: Opt for butter sold in tubs, glass jars, or foil-wrapped blocks instead of paper-wrapped sticks.
- Make Your Own Butter: The most surefire way to avoid packaging contamination is to make butter at home using organic, grass-fed cream sourced from farms known to be PFAS-free, if possible.
- Scrutinize Packaging: Be wary of packaging labeled as 'greaseproof' or 'water-resistant,' as these often indicate the presence of a PFAS coating.
- Support Informed Brands: Look for brands that explicitly state they use PFAS-free packaging. Some companies voluntarily announce their commitment to safer packaging.
Comparative Analysis of Butter Options
| Butter Type | Packaging | Production Method | Potential PFAS Risk | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Wrapped Butter | Paper/Paperboard | Conventional | Higher | Risk from grease-proof paper packaging. |
| Tested PFAS-Free Wrapper | Paper/Paperboard | Varies | Lower | Based on third-party testing, still subject to potential environmental contamination. |
| Tubbed or Jarred Butter | Plastic Tub or Glass Jar | Varies | Low to None | Avoids paper packaging contamination route; risk remains from raw milk source. |
| Homemade Butter | None | Your control | Very Low | Eliminates packaging risk; quality depends on cream source and storage. |
| Clarified Butter (Ghee) | Glass Jar/Tub | Heated, milk solids removed | Lower | The processing may remove some components, but origin of milk is still key. |
Conclusion
While it is challenging to guarantee a product is 100% free of PFAS due to widespread environmental contamination, consumers have more power than ever to make safer choices. The primary risk from butter appears to be linked to its grease-proof paper packaging, a practice that is already being phased out due to FDA action and manufacturer commitments. Choosing brands that have tested low for PFAS indicators in their wrappers or opting for alternative packaging can significantly reduce your exposure. For the lowest risk, making your own butter is the most effective method. As regulation evolves, staying informed and prioritizing transparency from food producers remains the best strategy for protecting your health. For more general guidance on reducing chemical exposure from food packaging, Toxic-Free Future is a reliable resource.