Skip to content

Which fish is healthier, pollock or cod? A Nutritional Deep Dive

4 min read

While both pollock and cod belong to the same family and are excellent sources of lean protein, wild-caught Alaskan pollock generally contains significantly lower levels of mercury than its cod relatives. Understanding these key differences can help you determine which fish is healthier, pollock or cod, for your specific dietary needs.

Quick Summary

This guide compares the health benefits, nutritional content, mercury levels, and sustainability of pollock and cod. A detailed table and analysis explore their differences in omega-3s, vitamins, and minerals. It also covers culinary uses, cost, and factors like mercury content for informed consumption decisions.

Key Points

  • Low Mercury Leader: Alaska pollock has consistently lower mercury levels than cod, making it a safer option for more frequent consumption, especially for sensitive populations.

  • Nutrient-Rich Protein Source: Both are excellent sources of lean protein, B vitamins (particularly B12), and selenium, supporting muscle growth, energy, and immune function.

  • Omega-3 Content Varies: While both contain omega-3s, Alaska pollock typically has a higher content than Pacific cod.

  • Sustainability Varies by Source: Both can be sustainable choices when sourced from responsibly managed fisheries, such as those certified in Alaska.

  • Textural Differences: Cod has a firmer, sturdier texture ideal for dishes like fish and chips, while pollock is more delicate and works well in tacos or processed products.

  • Taste Profile: Pollock has a milder flavor, whereas cod offers a slightly richer, more pronounced seafood taste.

In This Article

Pollock vs. Cod: An Overview of Two Healthy Whitefish

Pollock and cod are both popular, mild-flavored whitefish that are members of the Gadidae family. They are known for being low in calories and high in protein, making them staple choices for a healthy diet. However, a closer look at their nutritional profiles, mercury content, and environmental impact reveals several important distinctions. While both offer valuable nutrients, certain factors may make one a better choice for you than the other.

Nutritional Profile: What's in a Fillet?

At a glance, pollock and cod share many nutritional similarities, but some key differences emerge upon closer inspection. Both are rich in high-quality protein, which is essential for building and repairing tissues. They also provide a good source of selenium, a powerful antioxidant that supports thyroid function and the immune system. In terms of vitamins, both offer a healthy dose of B vitamins, particularly B12, which is crucial for nerve function and red blood cell production.

  • Omega-3 Fatty Acids: While whitefish like pollock and cod are not as high in omega-3s as fattier fish like salmon, they do contain a decent amount. Notably, some sources indicate that Alaska pollock can have nearly twice the omega-3 content of Pacific cod. These essential fatty acids are well-known for their anti-inflammatory properties and benefits for heart and brain health.
  • Iodine: Cod is considered a superior source of iodine, a mineral vital for proper thyroid function and metabolic regulation. Those monitoring their iodine intake might consider this difference.
  • Fat and Calories: Both are very lean, but cod tends to be slightly leaner than pollock, with a lower fat content. This makes cod a marginally lower-calorie option per serving, though the difference is minimal in a balanced diet.

Mercury Levels: A Critical Distinction

For many health-conscious consumers, especially pregnant women and young children, mercury content is a significant consideration when choosing seafood. This is where a clear winner emerges between the two fish.

  • Pollock: Wild Alaska pollock consistently tests for much lower mercury levels, with a concentration of around 0.031 ppm. This low level means it can be safely consumed frequently without restriction, according to most health organizations.
  • Cod: Pacific cod has a higher, albeit still considered low-to-moderate, mercury concentration of around 0.111 ppm. Because of this, some organizations recommend limiting consumption to around 16 to 24 ounces per month, particularly for sensitive groups.

Sustainability: Responsible Harvesting

When harvested from well-managed fisheries, both pollock and cod can be sustainable choices. The key is to look for seafood certified by reputable organizations, such as the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) or managed under NOAA regulations.

  • Wild Alaska Pollock: Often cited as one of the world's most sustainably managed and abundant fisheries. Wild Alaska pollock is a "climate-smart" protein with a relatively low carbon footprint.
  • Atlantic vs. Pacific Cod: While Atlantic cod stocks have faced overfishing in the past, they are managed under rebuilding plans. Pacific cod from Alaskan fisheries is also considered a sustainable option.

Taste, Texture, and Culinary Uses

Beyond nutrition, the culinary properties of pollock and cod differ, influencing how they are best prepared.

  • Pollock: The flesh is tender, delicate, and flakes finely. Its milder flavor makes it less “fishy” than cod. This texture can cause it to break apart more easily when cooked, making it ideal for dishes like stir-fries, tacos, or processed products like fish sticks and imitation crab meat.
  • Cod: Cod has a firmer, more robust texture with larger, sturdier flakes. It holds its shape better during cooking, which is why it is often preferred for classic fish and chips, stews, or baking. Its flavor is slightly richer and more pronounced than pollock.

Cost and Availability

Generally, pollock is more abundant and less expensive than cod, making it a budget-friendly option. Its use in many fast-food and frozen products contributes to its widespread availability and lower price point. Cod is typically a more premium and costly fish.

Comparison Table

Feature Wild Alaska Pollock Pacific Cod
Mercury Levels Very low (0.031 ppm) Low-to-moderate (0.111 ppm)
Omega-3s Generally higher than Pacific cod Lower than pollock in Omega-3s
Iodine Good source, but less than cod Excellent source
Texture Tender, delicate, fine flakes Firmer, robust, larger flakes
Flavor Mild and delicate Slightly richer, more pronounced
Sustainability Very sustainable in Alaska Sustainable from well-managed fisheries like Alaska
Cost More affordable More expensive
Best For... Stir-fries, tacos, fish sticks, imitation crab Fish and chips, baking, chowders

Conclusion: Which is the Winner?

Both pollock and cod are nutritious and healthy additions to a diet, providing high-quality protein, B vitamins, and other minerals. The “healthier” option ultimately depends on your priorities.

  • For minimizing mercury intake: Pollock is the clear winner. Its significantly lower mercury content makes it a safer choice for frequent consumption, particularly for pregnant and nursing women and young children.
  • For higher omega-3s: Alaska pollock typically provides more omega-3 fatty acids than cod.
  • For firmer texture and iodine: Cod is preferable if you desire a firmer fish that holds up well in hearty dishes and if you're seeking a higher iodine content.
  • For budget-friendliness: Pollock is the more economical choice.

No matter your choice, the healthiest preparation method—baking, grilling, or steaming—is crucial for maximizing benefits. To ensure you are making a sustainable choice, look for fish certified by an independent third-party, like the MSC. By considering these factors, you can make an informed decision on whether pollock or cod is the right catch for your next meal.

What are the health benefits of eating fish?

Consuming fish regularly is associated with a lower risk of heart disease, improved brain function, and reduced inflammation, thanks to beneficial omega-3 fatty acids. It is also a valuable source of essential vitamins and minerals. To learn more about the health benefits of adding fish to your diet, consult resources from health authorities like the American Heart Association.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, pollock is generally considered healthier for pregnant women because it contains significantly lower mercury levels than cod, allowing for more frequent and safer consumption.

Alaska pollock is often cited as having nearly twice the omega-3 fatty acid content of Pacific cod, making it the better choice for this nutrient.

Yes, pollock is typically a more affordable and widely available alternative to cod due to its abundance in the commercial fishing industry.

While both contain B vitamins, cod is a significantly better source of iodine and also contains more vitamin D, especially in its liver oil.

Cod is generally preferred for fish and chips because its firmer flesh holds up better during the frying process, whereas pollock's more delicate texture can cause it to fall apart.

Look for certifications from organizations like the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) or source seafood specifically identified as being from well-managed fisheries, such as those in Alaska.

No, it is not recommended to eat either pollock or cod raw. Both can contain parasitic worms that are killed during the cooking process, so thorough cooking is essential for food safety.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.