Skip to content

Which has more iron salmon or tuna?

2 min read

Tuna contains significantly more iron than salmon, according to nutritional data. While both fish are valuable sources of highly absorbable heme iron, a 100-gram serving of fresh tuna typically provides over 1 mg of iron, whereas the same amount of fresh salmon offers substantially less.

Quick Summary

Tuna has a higher iron content per 100-gram serving compared to salmon. Both fish offer highly bioavailable heme iron, but tuna is the superior choice for boosting iron intake, while salmon is richer in omega-3 fatty acids.

Key Points

  • Tuna has more iron: On average, tuna contains significantly more iron per 100-gram serving than salmon.

  • Heme iron is key: Both fish provide heme iron, which is absorbed more efficiently by the body than the non-heme iron found in plants.

  • Salmon is rich in omega-3s: While lower in iron, salmon is an excellent source of anti-inflammatory omega-3 fatty acids, which support heart and brain health.

  • Nutrient density varies: Nutritional content can differ based on factors like cooking method, whether the fish is fresh or canned, and the specific species.

  • Variety is beneficial: Incorporating both tuna and salmon into your diet provides a wider range of nutrients for overall health.

  • Consider your goals: If increasing iron intake is the priority, choose tuna. If focusing on heart-healthy fats, opt for salmon.

In This Article

Tuna vs. Salmon: A Nutritional Iron Showdown

When comparing salmon and tuna for iron content, tuna is the clear winner. The darker red color of tuna indicates its higher myoglobin, a protein carrying oxygen and iron. A 100-gram serving of canned tuna in brine can contain about 1.16 mg of iron, while cooked fresh Atlantic salmon of the same weight has around 0.34 mg. The iron in both is heme iron, which the body absorbs more easily than non-heme iron from plants.

The Iron Advantage of Tuna

Tuna's higher iron content makes it a better option for increasing iron intake. The iron in tuna, a type of heme iron, is beneficial for creating red blood cells and preventing iron-deficiency anemia. Canned tuna is a convenient source, with iron levels varying slightly based on type and preparation. However, canned options may also be higher in sodium.

What Salmon Offers Beyond Iron

Although lower in iron, salmon is rich in other nutrients, particularly omega-3 fatty acids vital for heart and brain health. Salmon provides a good balance of omega-3s and some iron for those seeking diverse nutrients.

Complete Nutritional Profile Comparison

Nutrient (per 100g) Fresh Tuna (Yellowfin, Raw) Fresh Salmon (Atlantic, Farmed, Raw)
Iron (mg) 0.77 mg 0.34 mg
Protein (g) 24 g 20 g
Omega-3s (g) ~0.2 g ~2.0 g
Calories (kcal) 109 kcal 208 kcal
Vitamin B12 (µg) 2.1 µg 3.2 µg
Selenium (µg) 91 µg 24 µg
Fat (g) 0.49 g 13 g

The Role of Heme Iron

Heme iron from animal sources like fish is absorbed more effectively than non-heme iron from plants. This makes fish a potent source for improving iron levels, especially for those with iron deficiency.

Making the Right Choice for Your Health

Choosing between salmon and tuna depends on your health priorities. For higher iron intake, tuna is preferable. For more omega-3s and heart benefits, salmon is better. Including both fish types in your diet can provide a wide array of nutrients. For safe fish consumption guidelines and other iron-rich foods, you can refer to resources like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency website.

Conclusion

Tuna contains more iron than salmon. However, both are excellent sources of nutrients. Tuna offers more iron and is lower in fat, while salmon is rich in omega-3 fatty acids. Including both in a balanced diet can contribute to overall health and provide a range of beneficial nutrients.

Frequently Asked Questions

The iron content in tuna can vary slightly by species. However, most canned and fresh tuna varieties are reliable sources, with canned versions typically offering around 1 mg or more of iron per 100 grams.

Canned tuna generally contains more iron than canned salmon. For example, some sources show canned tuna with around 1.3 mg of iron per 100g, while canned pink salmon contains about 1.0 mg.

Yes, the iron in fish is heme iron, which is absorbed much more efficiently by the body compared to the non-heme iron found in plant-based foods.

Yes, if your main goal is to increase your iron intake, choosing tuna is the more effective option due to its higher concentration of the mineral.

Cooking does not significantly destroy the mineral content of fish like iron. However, how the fish is prepared and any added ingredients can affect its overall nutritional profile.

Yes, other fish and shellfish such as clams, oysters, mussels, and sardines are also excellent sources of heme iron.

Salmon is notably richer in heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin D than tuna.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.