Skip to content

Which is better for you, allulose or stevia? A Sweetener Showdown

5 min read

Over one-third of participants in a study reported digestive issues after consuming large quantities of allulose, while stevia is recognized for having no impact on blood sugar. This makes choosing the right low-calorie alternative a balancing act, begging the question: which is better for you, allulose or stevia?. This article breaks down the science behind these popular sugar substitutes.

Quick Summary

Compare the pros and cons of allulose and stevia, including taste profiles, caloric content, cooking applications, and potential side effects, to find your ideal sugar substitute.

Key Points

  • Taste Preference: Allulose offers a clean, sugar-like taste perfect for baking, while stevia provides an intense sweetness with a potential aftertaste best for beverages.

  • Blood Sugar Management: Both allulose and stevia have a minimal to zero impact on blood sugar levels, making them suitable choices for those managing diabetes or on low-carb diets.

  • Baking Performance: Allulose excels in baking by replicating sugar's browning and bulk properties, whereas stevia often requires fillers to achieve a similar texture.

  • Digestive Effects: Allulose may cause digestive distress like bloating and diarrhea in high doses, while stevia is generally well-tolerated, though aftertaste is a common complaint.

  • Origin and Calories: Allulose is a rare sugar with minimal calories (0.4 kcal/g), and stevia is a zero-calorie extract from a plant, both originating from natural sources but undergoing commercial processing.

  • Cost Efficiency: Per serving, stevia is typically more cost-effective due to its concentrated sweetness, while allulose can be more budget-friendly for bulk applications like baking.

In This Article

Understanding Allulose: The Rare Sugar

Allulose is a rare sugar, or monosaccharide, that occurs naturally in small quantities in foods like figs, raisins, and maple syrup. Commercially, it is produced by converting fructose from corn or other plants. Despite being a sugar, it is absorbed by the body but not metabolized for energy, giving it a near-zero calorie count (about 0.4 calories per gram). It has no effect on blood glucose or insulin levels, making it a safe choice for individuals with diabetes or those on low-carb diets.

Health Benefits and Considerations

In addition to being a low-calorie, diabetic-friendly option, allulose offers several health advantages. Research indicates it does not contribute to tooth decay, which is a major concern with regular sugar consumption. It may also have anti-obesity effects by increasing energy expenditure and reducing abdominal fat, though much of this research has been in animal models. Some studies also suggest it may have antioxidant properties. The primary downside to allulose is its potential for causing gastrointestinal issues like bloating and diarrhea when consumed in large quantities. The threshold for these effects varies by individual, so moderation is key.

Taste Profile and Culinary Uses

Allulose is celebrated for its clean, sugar-like taste, and most people report little to no aftertaste. It is approximately 70% as sweet as table sugar. In baking and cooking, allulose performs exceptionally well, behaving much like sugar by caramelizing, browning, and providing bulk and moisture. This makes it a preferred choice for baked goods, sauces, and frozen desserts where texture is important.

Understanding Stevia: The Plant-Based Sweetener

Stevia is a natural, plant-based sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant. The sweet compounds, called steviol glycosides, are extracted from the leaves and are exceptionally sweet—between 50 and 350 times sweeter than sugar. Unlike allulose, stevia contains zero calories and zero carbohydrates, making it a powerful tool for weight management and blood sugar control. It has a glycemic index of zero and does not cause blood sugar spikes.

Health Benefits and Considerations

Stevia's health benefits include its ability to support weight management by reducing calorie intake and its potential to improve insulin sensitivity. Like allulose, it is also non-cariogenic and does not promote tooth decay. Some research also suggests stevia has antioxidant and anti-hypertensive properties, but more human studies are needed. The most common complaint about stevia is a bitter or licorice-like aftertaste, which can be off-putting for some users. While purified stevia extracts are considered safe, the long-term effects of consuming high amounts require further research.

Taste Profile and Culinary Uses

Because of its intense sweetness, stevia requires very little product to achieve the desired effect, especially in beverages like coffee and tea. For baking, its lack of bulk and different behavior under heat mean it is often blended with other sweeteners or fillers to achieve a sugar-like volume and texture. Stevia is therefore less versatile for baking than allulose, where the browning and textural properties of sugar are needed.

Allulose vs. Stevia: A Head-to-Head Comparison

To help you decide, here is a detailed comparison of the two sweeteners:

Feature Allulose Stevia
Origin Rare sugar, derived from fructose Plant-based extract from Stevia rebaudiana
Sweetness ~70% as sweet as sugar 50-350 times sweeter than sugar
Taste Profile Clean, sugar-like taste; little to no aftertaste Intense sweetness; can have a bitter aftertaste for some
Calories Minimal (0.4 kcal/g) Zero
Impact on Blood Sugar Does not affect blood sugar or insulin levels Does not affect blood sugar; may improve insulin sensitivity
Baking Performance Excellent; browns and provides bulk like sugar Poor; requires fillers to mimic sugar's bulk
Best for Baking, frozen desserts, sauces Beverages, tabletop sweetening
Side Effects Potential for bloating/diarrhea with high intake Generally well-tolerated; aftertaste is common

Which Sweetener is Right for You?

Choosing between allulose and stevia comes down to your personal preferences and intended use. Consider the following factors when making your decision:

  • Flavor Profile: If a clean, sugar-like taste is your priority, especially for baking, allulose is the better choice. If you can tolerate or don't mind stevia's unique aftertaste, its zero-calorie profile is an attractive feature.
  • Baking Needs: For recipes that require browning, caramelization, and bulk, allulose is the superior option, as it functions most like sugar. Stevia is suitable for recipes that primarily need concentrated sweetness without the textural and structural properties of sugar.
  • Health Goals: Both are excellent for managing blood sugar and weight, but in different ways. Allulose may have additional metabolic benefits related to GLP-1 hormone stimulation for appetite suppression, while stevia may specifically enhance insulin sensitivity.
  • Digestive Sensitivity: If you have a sensitive stomach, test both in small amounts first. Allulose is known to cause more digestive distress at high doses than stevia.
  • Cost: Stevia is generally more cost-effective per serving due to its extreme sweetness, though the initial cost of allulose for baking might be more economical than buying smaller amounts of concentrated stevia.

Conclusion

Both allulose and stevia are effective and safe low-calorie sugar substitutes, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, there is no single 'better' option, as the best choice depends on your specific needs. For bakers and those seeking a taste closest to sugar, allulose is the clear winner. For calorie-conscious users who need concentrated sweetness for beverages and don't mind a potential aftertaste, stevia is a powerful, zero-calorie tool. As with any dietary change, moderation is advised, and you can explore FDA information on sweeteners to learn more.

Frequently Asked Questions about Allulose and Stevia

Q: Which sweetener is better for baking? A: Allulose is generally considered better for baking because it provides bulk, caramelizes, and browns similarly to regular sugar. Stevia is a highly concentrated sweetener and does not provide these functional properties.

Q: Does stevia have an aftertaste? A: Yes, many people report that stevia can have a bitter or licorice-like aftertaste, especially in higher concentrations. Allulose, in contrast, has a taste profile much closer to table sugar with minimal aftertaste.

Q: Are both allulose and stevia safe for diabetics? A: Both sweeteners are considered safe for diabetics because they do not raise blood sugar or insulin levels. In fact, both have been linked to potential benefits for blood sugar management.

Q: Can allulose cause digestive problems? A: Yes, if consumed in large quantities, allulose may cause gastrointestinal issues such as bloating, gas, and diarrhea. It is important to start with small amounts and find your personal tolerance.

Q: Is stevia more natural than allulose? A: While both originate from natural sources (allulose found in fruits, stevia from a plant), both undergo significant commercial processing. Stevia is extracted from a plant, and allulose is produced from fructose.

Q: Which sweetener is cheaper? A: Stevia is often more cost-effective per serving because of its high sweetness concentration, meaning you need to use very little. Allulose can be more expensive per ounce, but its 1:1 sugar replacement in baking can be more economical than purchasing other additives for stevia.

Q: How does allulose compare to sugar alcohols like erythritol? A: Allulose and erythritol both have minimal impact on blood sugar, but allulose is often considered easier on digestion for those with sensitivities. Allulose also tastes more like real sugar compared to many sugar alcohols.

Q: How do allulose and stevia compare for weight loss? A: Both can aid in weight loss by replacing high-calorie sugar. Allulose has been suggested to have some appetite-suppressing effects by boosting GLP-1 hormone, while stevia helps with calorie reduction directly due to its zero-calorie nature.

Frequently Asked Questions

The 'better' option depends on your specific needs. Allulose is ideal if you prioritize a taste and texture similar to sugar, especially for baking. Stevia is a potent, zero-calorie option excellent for sweetening beverages if you don't mind its aftertaste.

Yes, allulose is highly effective for baking. It provides the bulk, browning, and caramelization that regular sugar does, making it an excellent 1:1 replacement in many recipes.

Yes, purified stevia extract is considered safe for individuals with diabetes. It has a zero glycemic index and does not raise blood sugar levels.

Allulose has a higher potential for causing digestive issues like bloating and diarrhea when consumed in large amounts compared to stevia. It is best to start with small doses of allulose to assess your tolerance.

Both originate from natural sources; stevia from a plant, and allulose from fruits, but both undergo commercial processing to become the products we buy. Neither can be considered purely unprocessed in their final form.

Stevia is significantly sweeter than allulose. Stevia extracts are 50 to 350 times sweeter than sugar, while allulose is only about 70% as sweet as sugar.

Some studies suggest that high intake of allulose or certain compounds in stevia may potentially affect gut microbiota, but more long-term human research is needed to fully understand their impact. Stevia has been linked to disrupting beneficial bacteria growth in test-tube studies.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.