Skip to content

Which is Healthier, Tuna in Water or Oil? A Nutritional Showdown

4 min read

According to the USDA, a 5-ounce can of drained tuna in water contains approximately 120 calories, while the same size in oil contains around 280 calories. This significant difference in energy content is just one of many factors to consider when asking which is healthier, tuna in water or oil for your diet.

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive comparison of canned tuna packed in water versus oil, detailing the key nutritional differences, including calories, fat, omega-3s, and sodium. It also explores the variations in taste and texture and offers guidance on how to choose the best option based on your dietary needs and culinary uses.

Key Points

  • Calorie and Fat Difference: Tuna packed in water is significantly lower in calories and fat than tuna packed in oil.

  • Omega-3 Retention: Draining water-packed tuna helps retain the fish's natural omega-3s, while draining oil-packed tuna can discard some healthy omega-3 fats.

  • Flavor and Texture Impact: Oil-packed tuna has a richer taste and softer texture, while water-packed tuna is firmer with a milder flavor.

  • Mercury Levels Are Species-Dependent: The amount of mercury depends on the tuna species (albacore vs. skipjack), not the packing liquid.

  • Culinary Application Matters: Choose water-packed for low-calorie dishes like tuna salad and patties, and oil-packed for richer pasta or gourmet salads.

  • Sodium Varies by Brand: Always check the label for sodium content, as it can differ greatly regardless of the packing liquid.

In This Article

For many, canned tuna is a pantry staple—a convenient and affordable source of lean protein. However, a common point of confusion for health-conscious consumers is whether to choose tuna packed in water or oil. While both provide a host of health benefits, the packing liquid can significantly impact the nutritional profile, flavor, and texture. Your individual health goals, whether it's weight management, heart health, or just a delicious meal, should guide your decision.

The Nutritional Breakdown: Water vs. Oil

Calorie and Fat Content

This is the most pronounced difference between the two options. Tuna packed in water is significantly lower in both calories and fat compared to its oil-packed counterpart. A standard serving of water-packed tuna can have less than half the calories of a similar serving in oil. This is a critical point for anyone focused on weight loss or reducing overall calorie intake. The fat that is added to oil-packed tuna seeps into the fish, increasing its energy density, even after draining.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids

Tuna is an excellent source of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids, like EPA and DHA. The common assumption is that oil-packed tuna would contain more omega-3s, but this is not always the case, especially if you drain the oil. A 2011 study published in Public Health Nutrition found that when oil-packed tuna is drained, many of the healthy omega-3s are drained away with the packing oil. In contrast, draining water-packed tuna retains the fish's natural omega-3 content. The type of oil used also matters; if it's packed in a cheaper vegetable oil high in omega-6s, it can alter the fish's fatty acid balance. However, some premium brands pack tuna in heart-healthy extra virgin olive oil.

Vitamins and Minerals

Both water- and oil-packed tuna offer similar inherent vitamin and mineral content, including B vitamins, iron, and selenium. A notable exception is Vitamin D. Because it is fat-soluble, some studies have shown that oil-packed tuna can contain higher levels of Vitamin D due to the added oil. The presence of added oil can also potentially enhance the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins present in the fish itself.

Sodium Levels

Canned tuna generally contains higher sodium levels than fresh tuna, but the amount can vary drastically between brands and packing liquids. Some brands offer low-sodium or no-salt-added versions for both water and oil-packed tuna. It's always best to check the nutritional label if you are monitoring your sodium intake.

Flavor, Texture, and Culinary Applications

Tuna packed in oil

  • Flavor: The oil infuses the tuna, resulting in a richer, more robust flavor profile. If packed in olive oil, it can lend a distinct Mediterranean flavor.
  • Texture: The oil coats the tuna flakes, giving it a softer, more succulent texture that is less dry than water-packed.
  • Best for: Dishes where the richness and moisture are desired, such as in pasta, antipasti, gourmet sandwiches, or when eating straight from the can.

Tuna packed in water

  • Flavor: The taste is cleaner and more subtle, allowing the natural flavor of the tuna to shine through.
  • Texture: The absence of oil results in a firmer, flakier, and drier texture.
  • Best for: Recipes that already incorporate a source of fat, like mayonnaise for tuna salad, or for dishes requiring a firmer texture, such as tuna patties, casseroles, or dips.

Which Canned Tuna is Healthier?

Feature Water-Packed Tuna Oil-Packed Tuna
Calories Lower (ideal for weight loss) Higher (adds significant calories)
Total Fat Lower Higher
Omega-3s Retains natural omega-3s when drained Can lose omega-3s when drained
Vitamins (e.g., D) Standard content Potentially higher levels if packed in quality oil
Sodium Varies by brand; low-sodium options available Varies by brand; low-sodium options available
Flavor Milder, cleaner taste Richer, more robust flavor
Texture Firmer, drier, and flakier Softer and more moist
Best For... Tuna salad, casseroles, patties Pasta dishes, salads, gourmet sandwiches

Additional Considerations for Choosing Canned Tuna

Tuna Species and Mercury Levels

Regardless of whether tuna is packed in water or oil, the species determines its mercury content. Larger fish like albacore (often labeled 'white tuna') accumulate more mercury than smaller species like skipjack (often labeled 'light tuna'). For regular consumption, particularly for pregnant women or young children, health guidelines recommend opting for chunk light (skipjack) tuna to minimize mercury exposure.

Sustainability and Packaging

To make an eco-friendly choice, look for tuna with certifications like the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label, which indicates sustainable fishing practices. Additionally, concerns about the chemical Bisphenol A (BPA) in the lining of some cans have led many consumers to seek out BPA-free packaging.

How to Make the Healthiest Choice

The healthiest choice depends on your specific nutritional needs and culinary purpose. If you are watching your calorie and fat intake, or if you plan to add your own healthy fats like avocado or olive oil, water-packed tuna is the better option. For those seeking a richer flavor and moisture without worrying about extra calories, or for specific dishes where the oil enhances the final product, oil-packed tuna is a reasonable choice. For optimal heart health, remember that the American Heart Association recommends two servings of fish per week.

Conclusion

Ultimately, there is no single answer to which is healthier, tuna in water or oil. For those aiming for lower calories, less fat, and a cleaner flavor, water-packed is the superior choice. It also retains more of the fish's intrinsic omega-3s when drained. However, if flavor and moisture are the priority, and the added calories aren't a concern, oil-packed tuna can be a delicious and still nutritious option, especially when packed in healthy olive oil. To make the best decision, consider your dietary needs, culinary application, and always check the nutritional labels for calorie, sodium, and fat content.

Learn more about the differences and how to choose the right tuna for your meal.

Frequently Asked Questions

For weight loss, tuna packed in water is the better choice. It contains fewer calories and less fat than oil-packed tuna, making it easier to manage your overall caloric intake.

Yes. When you drain oil-packed tuna, you lose some of the omega-3 fatty acids along with the oil. Draining water-packed tuna helps retain more of the natural omega-3s that are in the fish itself.

While both contain omega-3s, a 2011 study showed that, after draining, water-packed tuna had a higher concentration of omega-3s than oil-packed tuna. If you want to maximize your omega-3 intake from canned tuna, water-packed is the better option.

No, the packing liquid (water or oil) does not affect the mercury content. The mercury level in canned tuna is determined by the species of tuna, with larger fish like albacore having higher levels than smaller skipjack tuna.

Oil-packed tuna generally has a richer, more flavorful taste. The oil infuses the fish, making it more robust and moist compared to the milder, cleaner taste of water-packed tuna.

Yes, but be mindful of the added fat. If you use oil-packed tuna, you may want to use less mayonnaise or other fats to balance the calorie count. Oil-packed tuna will also give your salad a richer flavor and softer texture.

If packed in extra virgin olive oil, it can offer additional heart-healthy monounsaturated fats. However, it will still contain significantly more calories than water-packed tuna, so moderation is key.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.