Skip to content

Which of the following artificial sweeteners was banned by the FDA in 1969?

5 min read

In October 1969, a study finding that high doses caused bladder tumors in rats led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ban cyclamate. This regulatory action, which removed cyclamates from the market by early 1970, marked a significant moment in the history of artificial sweeteners.

Quick Summary

The artificial sweetener cyclamate was banned by the FDA in 1969 after studies suggested it caused tumors in rats. The ban had a major impact on the diet food industry and consumer choices. Although later studies questioned the original findings, the ban remains in effect in the US.

Key Points

  • Cyclamate was the sweetener banned: The artificial sweetener banned by the FDA in 1969 was cyclamate, following a study that suggested a link to bladder tumors in rats.

  • The Delaney Clause was the legal basis: The ban was initiated under the strict provisions of the Delaney Clause, which prohibited any food additive found to cause cancer in animals or humans.

  • The ban caused industry shock: The decision came as a surprise to the food and beverage industry, forcing a massive reformulation of diet products that relied heavily on cyclamate.

  • Controversy surrounded the study: Later scientific reviews raised questions about the validity of the original rat study, citing the use of extremely high doses and potential impurities.

  • Status differs internationally: Despite the ongoing ban in the US, cyclamate is approved and used in many other countries, including Canada and the European Union, where it has been deemed safe.

  • The ban fueled the market for other sweeteners: With cyclamate off the market, saccharin saw a resurgence in popularity, becoming the primary alternative sweetener for the next decade.

In This Article

The Cyclamate Ban of 1969: A Historic Food Safety Decision

The Rise of Cyclamate

Discovered in 1937, cyclamate was once the most popular artificial sweetener in the United States. By the late 1960s, it was used in hundreds of food products, most notably diet soft drinks like Diet Pepsi and Tab, as well as canned fruits and jams. It was favored for its clean, sugar-like taste and heat stability, making it versatile for cooking and beverages. It was even included in the iconic pink packets of Sweet'N Low, combined with saccharin. For years, cyclamate was on the FDA's 'Generally Recognized As Safe' (GRAS) list, with the agency seeing no health concerns at the time. The growing demand from diet-conscious consumers and diabetics drove its widespread use.

The Study That Sparked the Ban

The downfall of cyclamate began with a long-term toxicity study commissioned by Abbott Laboratories, the primary manufacturer of the sweetener. In this study, rats were fed a mixture of cyclamate and saccharin at extremely high doses. The initial goal was to evaluate effects on reproduction and fertility. When the rats were autopsied at the study's conclusion in early October 1969, researchers discovered bladder tumors in some of the animals receiving the highest doses. The dose was so high it was equivalent to a human drinking hundreds of cans of diet soda daily.

FDA Action and The Delaney Clause

Upon receiving the preliminary findings, the National Cancer Institute and Abbott Laboratories reported the results to the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). At the time, the Delaney Clause was in effect, a provision of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1958. This clause mandated that any food additive shown to induce cancer in animals or humans be removed from the market. While the FDA typically had to prove a substance was unsafe, the Delaney Clause shifted the burden of proof to manufacturers to demonstrate absolute safety. Based on the rat study, Secretary of HEW Robert Finch announced the ban on October 18, 1969, effective February 1, 1970. The cyclamate was officially removed from the GRAS list on October 30.

Market and Consumer Reaction

The announcement sent shockwaves through the food and beverage industry. Manufacturers had to scramble to reformulate products, with most transitioning to saccharin, the only other widely available artificial sweetener. Consumers reacted with a mix of fear and disappointment. Some stocked up on cyclamate-containing products before they were pulled from shelves, while others worried about the loss of low-calorie options. Retailers faced challenges, with some removing products immediately and others holding them until the deadline.

The Cyclamate Controversy Continues

The story didn't end with the ban. Subsequent research raised doubts about the scientific validity of the original 1969 rat study. Factors like the extremely high doses, potential impurities in the saccharin used, and possible bladder parasites in the rats may have influenced the outcome. Over the years, Abbott Laboratories submitted petitions to the FDA for reapproval, and international health bodies, including the World Health Organization (WHO), have re-evaluated and deemed cyclamate safe. Today, cyclamate remains banned in the United States but is approved for use in over 130 countries worldwide, including Canada and the European Union. Its history remains a potent reminder of the complexities of food regulation and risk assessment.

Comparison of Banned vs. Approved Sweeteners

Feature Cyclamate (Banned) Saccharin (Limited/Approved) Aspartame (Approved) Sucralose (Approved)
FDA Status (USA) Banned since 1969 Approved (no longer requires warning label) Approved since 1981 Approved since 1998
Discovery Year 1937 1879 1965 1976
Sweetness (vs. Sugar) 30-50 times 200-700 times 200 times 600 times
Initial Controversy Bladder tumors in rats at high doses (1969) Bladder cancer in rats (1970s) Brain tumors (1970s) Marketing tactics (2000s)
Current Usage Banned in US, but used in over 130 countries Wide use in diet foods and drinks Common in diet sodas, gum, and other products Common in diet foods, drinks, and baking

Conclusion

The artificial sweetener banned by the FDA in 1969 was cyclamate. The decision, rooted in preliminary animal studies and the Delaney Clause, reshaped the diet food industry and fueled decades of debate over the safety of artificial sweeteners. While the scientific understanding of cyclamate's risks has evolved, the ban remains in effect in the US, while the sweetener is widely used elsewhere. This historical event serves as a crucial case study in the ever-evolving landscape of food science, consumer health, and government regulation. For more details on the legislative and historical context surrounding food additives, see the FDA's official records.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Why was cyclamate banned by the FDA in 1969? Answer: Cyclamate was banned after a laboratory study involving rats fed extremely high doses of the sweetener found evidence of bladder tumors, triggering the Delaney Clause which mandated the removal of cancer-causing food additives.

Question: Is cyclamate still banned in the United States? Answer: Yes, cyclamate remains banned in the United States for use in foods and beverages, despite later studies questioning the validity of the original evidence.

Question: What is the Delaney Clause? Answer: The Delaney Clause is a 1958 amendment to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that requires the FDA to ban any food additive if it is found to cause cancer in animals or humans, regardless of the dose.

Question: Why is cyclamate still allowed in other countries but not in the US? Answer: Cyclamate is approved in over 130 countries, including Canada and the EU, because regulatory agencies in those regions have reviewed the scientific evidence and concluded that cyclamate is safe for consumption at recommended levels. The original US ban has not been reversed, although manufacturers have petitioned for it.

Question: Did cyclamate's removal affect the market for other artificial sweeteners? Answer: Yes, after the cyclamate ban, manufacturers quickly turned to saccharin as a replacement. This led to a huge increase in saccharin's market share until aspartame was approved years later.

Question: What role did the diet food industry play in the cyclamate controversy? Answer: The diet food and soft drink industries were significantly affected by the ban, as cyclamate was a key ingredient in many popular low-calorie products. Manufacturers were surprised and had to quickly innovate to find alternatives.

Question: Has there been any effort to reapprove cyclamate in the US? Answer: Yes, since the original ban, Abbott Laboratories and other groups have submitted petitions to the FDA for cyclamate's reapproval, but the FDA has so far denied or not acted upon these requests, citing unresolved safety issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cyclamate was banned by the FDA in 1969 after a study found that high doses of the sweetener, given to rats, caused bladder tumors, which activated the strict 'Delaney Clause' regulating food additives.

Yes, cyclamate is still banned from use in food and beverages in the United States, though its legal status differs significantly in many other countries.

The Delaney Clause, a 1958 amendment to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, required the FDA to ban any food additive proven to cause cancer in lab animals or humans.

After cyclamate was banned, many food and beverage manufacturers switched to saccharin as the primary artificial sweetener for their diet products, until aspartame was introduced later.

Cyclamate is approved and widely used in over 130 countries, including Canada and the European Union, where it can be found in diet soft drinks, tabletop sweeteners, and various food items.

Critics of the study point to the extremely high doses used, which were not reflective of human consumption, as well as possible confounding factors like impurities in the saccharin component of the test mixture.

Yes, manufacturers have submitted petitions to the FDA to reapprove cyclamate, citing a lack of reproducible evidence for its carcinogenic effects. However, the FDA has upheld the ban, citing unresolved questions about its safety.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.