Skip to content

Which virus is found in milk? A Guide to Avian Flu, BLV, and Milk Safety

5 min read

Recent public health warnings have highlighted that pathogenic viruses like H5N1 avian influenza have been detected in raw milk from infected dairy cattle. This raises the important question: which virus is found in milk and what are the risks to human health, especially from unpasteurized products?

Quick Summary

Raw milk can contain viruses such as avian influenza (H5N1), Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV), and Rift Valley Fever virus, posing significant health risks to consumers. Pasteurization effectively eliminates these viral threats, ensuring commercial milk is safe to drink.

Key Points

  • H5N1 Virus: Avian influenza (H5N1) has been detected in the raw milk of infected dairy cows, posing a potential transmission risk.

  • Bovine Leukemia Virus: BLV is a retrovirus common in cattle herds, and its DNA has been found in raw milk, with potential but unproven links to human health issues.

  • Viruses in Raw Milk: Raw, unpasteurized milk can carry other viruses like Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus and Rift Valley Fever Virus, posing risks to consumers.

  • Pasteurization is Critical: The commercial milk pasteurization process, by heating, effectively inactivates harmful viruses and bacteria, making milk safe for consumption.

  • Raw Milk is Risky: Health authorities strongly warn against drinking raw milk, citing numerous outbreaks of foodborne illnesses and the significant dangers for vulnerable populations.

In This Article

Viral Contamination: Why It Matters for Milk

While often celebrated by proponents for its 'natural' properties, unpasteurized, or raw, milk can serve as a vehicle for transmitting dangerous pathogens, including several viruses. Unlike commercially processed milk, which undergoes pasteurization to eliminate harmful microbes, raw milk carries an inherent risk of contamination from the animal or the milking environment. Understanding which virus is found in milk is crucial for making informed decisions about dairy consumption and appreciating the public health triumph of pasteurization.

H5N1 Avian Influenza

The emergence of the H5N1 avian flu virus in U.S. dairy cattle in 2024 brought viral contamination in milk to the forefront of public health concerns. Studies quickly confirmed that the virus can be present in the raw milk of infected cows.

  • Infected dairy cows can shed the H5N1 virus into their milk at high levels.
  • Although the risk of raw milk-to-human transmission is still being investigated, mice fed unpasteurized, H5N1-infected milk became sick, demonstrating a clear risk.
  • The FDA has found that standard pasteurization methods effectively inactivate the H5N1 virus, reinforcing the safety of commercially processed milk.

Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV)

Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) is a retrovirus that infects cattle worldwide and can be present in their milk. BLV infects lymphocytes and is the cause of enzootic bovine leukosis, a cancer in cattle.

  • Several studies have confirmed the presence of BLV DNA in raw milk samples.
  • While not definitively proven to cause disease in humans, researchers have found BLV DNA in human breast tissue, and some studies suggest a correlation with breast cancer.
  • Most U.S. dairy herds have been exposed to BLV, making it a widespread concern.
  • Pasteurization is believed to inactivate the virus, but the zoonotic potential is an area of ongoing research.

Other Viruses Potentially Found in Milk

Beyond H5N1 and BLV, other viruses have also been associated with raw milk or dairy cattle. Some are more widespread than others, but they all highlight the risk of bypassing proper milk processing.

  • Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV): This highly contagious virus can be shed in the milk of infected animals. FMDV can survive certain pasteurization methods, and specific protocols are required to inactivate it. Human cases are extremely rare.
  • Rift Valley Fever Virus (RVFV): Found in some endemic areas, this virus can be transmitted to humans through unpasteurized milk and meat. A study from Stanford found RVFV can remain infectious in raw milk under refrigerated conditions.
  • Cowpox Virus: A zoonotic virus that can be transmitted from infected cows to humans, often through milking. It causes lesions on the udder of cows and manifests as 'milker's nodules' in humans.
  • Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV): While more prevalent in sheep and goat's milk than cow's milk in endemic areas, TBEV can be transmitted through untreated milk. It is susceptible to high-temperature short-time (HTST) pasteurization.

The Critical Role of Pasteurization

Pasteurization is the most effective public health measure for ensuring the safety of milk by eliminating harmful bacteria and viruses. The process involves heating milk to a specific temperature for a set time, which is based on the pathogens of concern.

The FDA and CDC strongly recommend only consuming pasteurized milk and dairy products to minimize the risk of foodborne illness. While some viral material (RNA) may remain detectable after pasteurization, it is no longer infectious. This was confirmed by recent H5N1 testing on the commercial milk supply.

Risks of Consuming Raw Milk

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence and public health warnings, a movement promoting the consumption of raw milk persists. The risks, however, are significant, particularly for vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals.

Here are some of the dangers associated with raw milk consumption:

  • Foodborne Illness Outbreaks: The CDC has documented numerous illness outbreaks linked to raw milk, causing thousands of illnesses, hospitalizations, and even deaths.
  • Unpredictable Contamination: Harmful germs in raw milk can vary significantly and are not always present at high levels, leading to a false sense of security. The same source can be safe for a long time before causing serious illness.
  • No Proven Benefits: Scientific studies have not substantiated the anecdotal health claims attributed to raw milk, and any perceived benefits are outweighed by the considerable health risks.

Comparison Table: Raw Milk vs. Pasteurized Milk

Feature Raw (Unpasteurized) Milk Pasteurized Milk
Viral Contamination Risk High, as it contains infectious viruses like H5N1, BLV, and RVFV from infected animals. Very low to non-existent; the heat process effectively inactivates pathogenic viruses.
Bacterial Contamination Risk High; can contain dangerous bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, and Campylobacter. Very low; pasteurization is specifically designed to kill these harmful bacteria.
Infectious Genetic Material Contains both infectious viral particles and genetic material (RNA). May contain non-infectious viral genetic material (RNA), but the virus is not viable.
Public Health Regulation Sales are restricted or banned in many jurisdictions due to significant health risks. Federally and state-regulated to meet strict safety and sanitation standards.
Nutritional Content Claims of higher nutritional value are not scientifically proven and do not outweigh the risks. Retains essential nutrients; pasteurization does not significantly reduce nutritional value.
Consumer Safety High risk, especially for vulnerable populations, with documented outbreaks of foodborne illness. Very safe due to the elimination of harmful pathogens.

Conclusion: The Verdict on Viruses in Milk

Several viruses, including avian influenza (H5N1) and Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV), can be present in raw milk, transferred from infected dairy cattle. The discovery of H5N1 in dairy herds in 2024 underscored that raw milk is an unfiltered and potentially dangerous product. Fortunately, the long-standing practice of pasteurization provides a reliable solution, effectively and safely inactivating these and other pathogens. Public health agencies like the FDA and CDC consistently advise against consuming unpasteurized milk due to the significant risk of foodborne illness. By choosing pasteurized milk and dairy products, consumers can enjoy the nutritional benefits of milk without the preventable risk of viral contamination.

For more information on food safety and raw milk risks, consult the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's dedicated resources on the topic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, consuming raw (unpasteurized) milk can transmit viruses from infected animals to humans and cause illness. Experimental studies show that viruses like H5N1 avian flu can remain infectious in raw milk.

Pasteurization is highly effective at inactivating viruses in milk, including H5N1 avian influenza. The heat treatment destroys the virus's infectivity, making the milk safe.

While BLV DNA has been found in raw milk and human tissues, and some studies suggest an association with breast cancer, the risk of transmission to humans through consumption is still under investigation.

Store-bought milk in most countries is pasteurized, a process that effectively kills all harmful viruses and bacteria. Therefore, infectious viruses are not found in commercial milk.

Some people believe that raw milk is healthier or more natural, despite numerous scientific studies and public health warnings confirming its risks. These unsubstantiated health claims can lead to dangerous decisions.

Testing milk for viruses requires specialized laboratory equipment and procedures, which are not typically available for home use. It is safer and more reliable to simply pasteurize milk to eliminate pathogens.

The primary risk is contracting a foodborne illness from dangerous germs, including bacteria and viruses, that can be found in unpasteurized milk. Symptoms can range from mild to severe, and may even be life-threatening for vulnerable individuals.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.