Skip to content

Why are so many natives lactose intolerant? The genetic and evolutionary story

4 min read

Approximately 65% of the global adult population has a reduced ability to digest lactose, while estimates suggest this figure is nearly 100% among some American Indian communities. The reason why so many natives are lactose intolerant is rooted not in a medical disorder, but in human evolutionary history and ancestral dietary habits.

Quick Summary

The vast majority of the world's population, including Indigenous groups, naturally lose the ability to digest lactose after infancy. Lactase persistence, the ability to continue digesting milk sugar, is a recent genetic mutation that arose in populations with a long history of dairy farming. It is not an ailment but the ancestral human norm.

Key Points

  • Ancestral State: Lactose intolerance is the original human condition, where lactase enzyme production naturally declines after infancy.

  • Lactase Persistence: The ability to digest lactose into adulthood is a genetic mutation that developed in specific populations, not the global norm.

  • Gene-Culture Co-evolution: The lactase persistence gene spread in populations that adopted dairy farming, creating a strong selective advantage for those who could digest milk.

  • Indigenous Populations: Groups like Native Americans, East Asians, and many Africans did not have ancestral dairy farming, so the lactase persistence trait did not spread within their communities.

  • Global Prevalence: Rates of lactose intolerance vary dramatically, with low prevalence (around 5%) in Northern Europeans and high prevalence (up to 100%) in many Indigenous and East Asian populations.

  • Management: Symptoms can be managed through dietary changes, opting for low-lactose products, or using lactase enzyme supplements.

In This Article

The question of why certain ethnic groups, including Indigenous or "native" peoples, have a high rate of lactose intolerance is a fascinating case study in gene-culture co-evolution. Rather than being an anomaly, lactose intolerance is actually the default, or ancestral, state for all mammals, including humans. The ability to digest lactose into adulthood, known as lactase persistence, is a relatively recent mutation that is only common in a minority of the world's population today.

Understanding Lactase Persistence vs. Intolerance

To properly frame this topic, it's crucial to understand the distinction between lactase persistence and lactose intolerance. The enzyme lactase is responsible for breaking down lactose (the sugar in milk) into simpler sugars, glucose and galactose, which the body can then absorb. After weaning, the production of this enzyme naturally declines in most mammals. In humans, this decline typically begins in late childhood or adolescence.

  • Lactase Non-Persistence: The ancestral human condition, where the body significantly reduces lactase production after infancy. Consuming dairy products with high lactose content can cause digestive symptoms.
  • Lactase Persistence: A genetic mutation that prevents the reduction of lactase production, allowing an individual to digest lactose throughout their adult life.

For the majority of human history, post-weaning milk consumption was not a factor in survival. Thus, there was no selective pressure for the lactase persistence gene. This only changed with the advent of dairy farming.

The Evolutionary Root: Dairy Farming and Natural Selection

Approximately 10,000 years ago, in certain regions of Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, the domestication of milk-producing animals like cows, goats, and sheep began. In these pastoralist societies, milk became a significant food source. This shift introduced a powerful selective pressure. Individuals who, by chance, had a genetic mutation that allowed them to continue producing lactase into adulthood were able to access a new, calorie-rich, and relatively uncontaminated food source. During periods of famine or disease, this provided a significant survival advantage, allowing the lactase persistence trait to spread rapidly through the population.

Interestingly, this genetic mutation for lactase persistence arose independently in different regions, an example of convergent evolution. This explains why different alleles for the same trait exist across various populations with a history of dairying, such as Europeans and certain African pastoralist groups.

High Prevalence in Indigenous Populations

Indigenous populations across the Americas, Asia, and Africa generally did not have a long history of domesticating dairy animals as a primary food source. Therefore, the selective pressure that drove the spread of lactase persistence in other parts of the world never existed within their ancestral populations. For them, the ancestral condition of lactase non-persistence remained the norm. This historical dietary context is the single most important factor explaining the high prevalence of lactose intolerance among many Indigenous peoples today.

Evidence from multiple sources confirms this pattern across different Indigenous groups:

  • American Indians: As noted, some estimates suggest nearly 100% of American Indians are lactose intolerant. This is because their traditional diets were not centered on dairy from domesticated animals.
  • East Asian Populations: Lactase non-persistence is also extremely prevalent, with 70% to 100% of people of East Asian descent affected. These cultures also did not historically practice large-scale dairy farming.
  • Mexican Americans and West Africans: These groups also show very high rates, with prevalence ranging from 50% to 80%.

The Global Variation in Lactose Intolerance

The following table illustrates the dramatic differences in lactose intolerance prevalence across diverse global populations, highlighting the evolutionary factors at play.

Population Group Ancestral Dairy Tradition Approximate Lactose Intolerance Prevalence (Adults) Evolutionary Trait
Northern Europeans Strong, ancient tradition 5-15% High Lactase Persistence
Indigenous Americans No ancient tradition Up to 100% High Lactase Non-Persistence
East Asians No ancient tradition 70-100% High Lactase Non-Persistence
West Africans No ancient tradition 60-80% High Lactase Non-Persistence
South Asians Varies by region Up to 70% in some areas Mixed, varies greatly
Ashkenazi Jews Limited ancient tradition 60-80% High Lactase Non-Persistence

Addressing Health and Cultural Implications

The high prevalence of lactose intolerance in Indigenous communities has important implications for health. For instance, some Indigenous leaders are challenging USDA dietary guidelines that promote dairy, arguing that the recommendations are not suitable for their genetic profile and can lead to negative health outcomes. Symptoms like abdominal pain, bloating, gas, and diarrhea are common when a person with lactase non-persistence consumes large amounts of lactose. However, many can tolerate smaller amounts or fermented products like yogurt and hard cheeses, where the lactose content is significantly reduced.

Solutions for managing lactose intolerance can be straightforward. Individuals can limit dairy intake, opt for lactose-free products, or use over-the-counter lactase enzyme supplements. Educating people on the genetic basis of this trait helps reframe it from a 'disorder' to a normal, ancestral human characteristic, empowering individuals to manage their diets effectively.

Conclusion: The Normalcy of Intolerance

Ultimately, understanding why so many natives are lactose intolerant involves looking at the deep history of human diets and genetics. The evolutionary pressure created by dairy farming is what drove lactase persistence in a minority of the world's population. For the majority, including Indigenous peoples, the genetic trait of losing lactase production after infancy was simply never selected against, making it the biological norm. This knowledge not only explains the high prevalence in certain populations but also dispels the myth that lactose intolerance is an illness. Instead, it is a testament to the diverse ways human biology has adapted to different cultural and environmental factors over millennia.

For more information on the genetic and evolutionary basis of this topic, refer to the article "Lactose intolerance" on Wikipedia.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, lactose intolerance is not considered a disease. It is the ancestral and default condition for all humans and mammals after infancy. The ability to tolerate lactose into adulthood, or lactase persistence, is a genetic mutation.

The genetic reason is the lack of ancestral dairy farming. The genetic mutation for lactase persistence never became widespread in Native American populations because their traditional diets did not include domesticated dairy products, so there was no selective pressure for the trait to emerge.

No, not necessarily. The severity of symptoms varies, and many lactose intolerant individuals can consume small amounts of dairy or fermented products like yogurt and aged cheese, which have lower lactose content.

Indigenous people consumed milk as infants, like all mammals. However, their traditional post-weaning diets did not include dairy from domesticated animals, which is why most retained the ancestral inability to digest lactose into adulthood.

Europeans, especially those of Northern European descent, have high rates of lactose tolerance because a specific gene mutation for lactase persistence became common in their ancestral populations, likely due to a long history of dairy farming and the survival benefits it conferred.

The symptoms of lactose intolerance can include abdominal pain, bloating, gas, and diarrhea. These occur when undigested lactose ferments in the large intestine.

There is no cure for the genetic form of lactose intolerance. However, symptoms can be managed through dietary adjustments, such as reducing dairy intake, choosing lactose-free alternatives, or taking lactase enzyme supplements before consuming dairy.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.