The Case of Mistaken Identity: Sarsaparilla vs. Sassafras
Many consumers ask, "Why did sarsaparilla get banned?" but the root of the issue lies with a completely different plant: sassafras. While genuine sarsaparilla comes from the Smilax vine and is native to Central America, the popular American beverage known as sarsaparilla was historically flavored with the root bark of the Sassafras albidum tree, native to North America. The taste profiles of the two were similar enough that the name was often used interchangeably. The FDA's ban targeted sassafras, not the actual sarsaparilla plant.
The Sassafras Problem
- Flavoring Agent: Sassafras oil was used for its distinct flavor in sodas like root beer and sarsaparilla.
- Medicinal Uses: It was also used in folk medicine.
- The Carcinogen: Sassafras oil contains a compound called safrole.
The FDA Ban and the Safrole Scare
Research in the 1950s and 1960s found that high doses of safrole caused liver cancer in laboratory rats. Under the Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1958, which required banning food additives found to cause cancer, the FDA prohibited sassafras oil and safrole in mass-produced foods and medications in 1960. This ban forced the beverage industry to change, leading companies to use artificial sassafras flavorings or safrole-free extracts to replicate the taste.
A Comparison of Traditional vs. Modern Formulations
| Feature | Traditional Sassafras-Based Brew | Modern Sarsaparilla/Root Beer |
|---|---|---|
| Key Flavoring | Sassafras root bark (containing safrole) | Artificial sassafras flavor, safrole-free sassafras extract, or other botanicals |
| Potential Health Risk | High concentration of safrole, linked to cancer in animal studies | Generally safe, meeting FDA regulations |
| Origin | North American sassafras tree | Primarily uses Smilax vine extracts or other flavorings |
| Taste Profile | Earthy, spicy, and sometimes more medicinal | Often sweeter, creamier, and more consistent due to standardized flavorings |
The MDMA Precursor Theory
Some theories suggest the ban was due to safrole's use in MDMA production. However, the 1960 FDA ban predates MDMA being a controlled substance in 1985. While modern restrictions consider its drug potential, the initial ban was driven by carcinogenic findings.
Re-evaluating the Risk
Later research, like a study from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, questioned the high dosages used in the 1960s animal studies and noted that humans metabolize safrole differently than rats. Despite this, the FDA has not lifted the ban on safrole as a food additive, maintaining a precautionary stance. Genuine sarsaparilla root is still available, but safrole-containing sassafras oil remains prohibited for commercial food use.
Conclusion: A Regulatory Shift, Not a Total Ban
The question "why did sarsaparilla get banned?" highlights a significant moment in food safety history, where the focus was on sassafras, not sarsaparilla. The ban, caused by the discovery of the carcinogen safrole, led to changes in the beverage industry, resulting in the artificial flavors and safrole-free extracts used today. This event demonstrates the impact of food safety regulations on our cultural food landscape.