Skip to content

Why does Himalayan salt have microplastics? Uncovering the surprising truth

5 min read

Despite being harvested from ancient rock formations, a 2022 study revealed that coarse Himalayan pink salt had one of the highest microplastic loads among several commercial salts tested. The presence of microplastics in Himalayan salt is not a natural phenomenon from its millennia-old source, but a modern-day contamination problem.

Quick Summary

Himalayan salt contains microplastics primarily introduced during modern processing, packaging, and atmospheric exposure, not from its ancient geological source, challenging its reputation for natural purity.

Key Points

  • Source of Contamination: Microplastics enter Himalayan salt during modern processing, packaging, and via airborne particles, not from its ancient, mined origin.

  • Airborne and Handling Risks: Open-air processing and storage expose salt to airborne microplastics, while manufacturing equipment can shed plastic fibers and fragments.

  • Higher Than Sea Salt: Some studies have found that terrestrial salts, including Himalayan pink salt, contain higher microplastic loads than many sea salts, challenging common purity assumptions.

  • Health Concerns are Emerging: The long-term health effects of ingesting microplastics are still unknown, but concerns include inflammation, toxicity, and the particles acting as carriers for other environmental pollutants.

  • Informed Consumer Choices: Consumers can reduce microplastic exposure by choosing brands that offer certified third-party testing for contaminants or opting for alternative salt sources like deep aquifer spring salts.

In This Article

The Surprising Source of Contamination

Many consumers purchase Himalayan pink salt believing it to be a pristine, uncontaminated mineral product, protected by its subterranean origins. However, this assumption has been proven false by numerous scientific studies. The microplastics found in Himalayan salt do not date back to the time the salt beds were formed; instead, they are introduced through modern processes and atmospheric pollution. Understanding these modern contamination routes is key to grasping why a supposedly ancient salt is affected.

Airborne Contamination

One major pathway for microplastic contamination in Himalayan salt is atmospheric deposition. Microplastic fibers and particles are ubiquitous in both indoor and outdoor air, originating from sources like synthetic fabrics, vehicle tire abrasion, and the breakdown of plastic waste. When salt is dried, processed, or stored in open-air facilities, these airborne particles can settle and contaminate the product. The longer the exposure, the higher the risk of contamination. Some studies have found that coarse salts, which are often produced by evaporating water in open fields, have higher concentrations of microplastics than refined, fine salts because they are more exposed to airborne particles and lack further refining stages.

Contamination During Processing and Manufacturing

Even in controlled factory settings, the journey from mine to table is fraught with opportunities for contamination. Microplastics can be introduced through the equipment used to crush, transport, and process the salt. Conveyor belts, mechanical grinders, and other machinery often contain plastic components. As this equipment ages and wears down, it can shed small plastic particles and fibers that become mixed with the salt. Furthermore, the clothing worn by workers can also shed synthetic fibers, adding another layer of potential microplastic contamination to the product.

Packaging Materials

Once processed, the salt is packed and sealed for distribution, but even this step can be a source of microplastic introduction. The majority of commercial salt products are packaged in plastic bags or containers, and over time, these materials can degrade and shed microplastic particles. The storage environment also plays a role. Salt, being a hygroscopic and corrosive substance, can accelerate the degradation of its plastic packaging, leading to greater contamination. As a result, the type of packaging and the duration of storage can both contribute to the overall microplastic load in the final product.

A Global Problem: Comparing Salt Types and Contamination Levels

Microplastic contamination is a widespread issue affecting nearly all commercially available salt, regardless of its origin. However, research has shown that microplastic levels can vary significantly between different types of salt. While it was once assumed that sea salt would be the most contaminated due to ocean pollution, some studies have found surprising results when comparing terrestrial and marine sources.

For example, a study analyzing Australian commercial salts found that the contamination was higher in terrestrial salts like Himalayan and black salt compared to marine salts. This suggests that modern, post-harvesting contamination from processing and airborne particles may be a more significant factor than the source environment itself. Other studies echo these findings, highlighting that contamination levels are more dependent on current environmental factors and manufacturing practices than the salt's ancient origin.

Salt Type Common Origin Primary Source of Microplastics Common Purity Belief Scientific Findings
Himalayan Pink Salt Ancient Pakistani Mines Post-mining: processing, packaging, airborne particles Pristine and pure Studies show moderate to high levels, often higher than sea salt due to processing/atmospheric exposure
Sea Salt Ocean Evaporation Source contamination: plastics in marine ecosystems Exposed to modern pollution High risk of contamination from ocean, but filtration can reduce levels significantly
Table Salt Mined & Refined Processing and additives Highly processed, low mineral content Contamination levels vary widely; refining can remove some but not all microplastics
Spring Salt (e.g., Only Salt, Vera Salt) Underground Aquifers Post-harvesting: packaging, processing Very low contamination, high purity Often third-party tested and marketed as having very low or zero microplastic levels due to protected sourcing and careful processing

The Unknown Health Implications

The ingestion of microplastics through contaminated salt is a growing area of concern for human health, though research is still in its early stages. While humans can excrete most of the larger microplastic particles, smaller particles and nanoplastics may accumulate in the body. Potential risks are believed to arise in several ways:

  • Physical harm: The tiny plastic particles could cause physical damage to organs.
  • Chemical toxicity: The plastic itself can be toxic, and it can leach chemical additives used in its production into the body.
  • Carriers for other pollutants: Microplastics are known to act as carriers, attracting and absorbing other harmful chemicals, heavy metals, and pathogens from the environment. When ingested, these pollutants could be released inside the human body.

Despite these concerns, research on the definitive long-term health effects of microplastic exposure from diet remains limited. The full severity of the issue and potential risk factors are not yet fully understood, highlighting the need for more research.

Strategies to Minimize Your Exposure

While completely avoiding microplastics in food is nearly impossible, consumers can take steps to reduce their exposure from salt:

  • Choose Certified Brands: Some companies are now conducting and publishing third-party lab tests to prove low or negligible microplastic content. Look for brands that are transparent about their sourcing and testing procedures.
  • Opt for Alternative Salt Sources: Salts harvested from ancient, protected underground aquifers are often tested and certified to have lower microplastic levels. Consider brands like Vera Salt or Redmond Real Salt, which offer greater transparency.
  • Limit Overall Consumption: While salt is an essential nutrient, excessive intake is linked to health problems. By sticking to recommended dietary guidelines, you can not only improve your general health but also indirectly reduce your microplastic exposure from salt.

Conclusion

The belief that Himalayan salt is free from contaminants due to its ancient origin is a misconception rooted in a time before widespread plastic pollution. Research confirms that microplastic contamination, far from being a natural feature of the salt, is a modern problem introduced during processing, packaging, and atmospheric exposure. The presence of microplastics in our food supply is a complex issue with ongoing research into its health implications. For concerned consumers, seeking brands that offer certified testing for microplastics and heavy metals is a proactive step towards making more informed dietary choices. Awareness of how and why even seemingly natural products like Himalayan salt can become tainted is the first step toward mitigating personal exposure and supporting cleaner industry practices.

For more detailed scientific analysis on microplastic contamination in salt, see this study on commercial salts in Nepal.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, despite its ancient origins, modern research has confirmed that commercially available Himalayan salt can contain microplastics. Contamination occurs during manufacturing, packaging, and through exposure to airborne particles.

Microplastics primarily enter Himalayan salt after it is mined. Common pathways include airborne contamination during open processing, abrasion from factory equipment, and leaching from plastic packaging materials during storage.

Not always. While ocean pollution affects sea salt, some studies have surprisingly found higher microplastic concentrations in terrestrial salts, including coarse Himalayan pink salt, suggesting that post-harvesting contamination is a significant factor.

The full health effects of microplastic ingestion are still being studied. Concerns include the potential for particles to cause inflammation, toxicity from plastic additives, and the transport of other harmful pollutants into the body.

Some brands that source salt from protected underground aquifers or use advanced filtration and processing methods claim to have minimal or zero microplastic contamination. Look for companies that provide third-party lab testing results for transparency.

No, there is no practical or effective way to remove microplastics from salt at home. The particles are too small and dispersed to be removed through standard cooking or filtration methods.

To reduce exposure, consider consuming less salt, choosing brands with certified lab testing, and opting for salts sourced from protected, clean underground springs or aquifers.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.